Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral Harmonization of UAV and Satellite Data for the Needs of Precision Agriculture

  • MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In precision agriculture, remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can well complement and, in several cases, even completely replace satellite imagery. However, it is important to harmonize their signals for consistent use. In this work, the problem of spectral harmonization is considered. We propose two new methods of spectral harmonization: method of root-polynomial correction (RPC) and model-based spectral harmonization (MBSH). The methods are evaluated on a synthetic dataset that is generated using AVIRIS hyperspectral data and known spectral sensitivities of two sensors: Sentinel-2A (satellite) and Parrot Sequoia+ (UAV). The RPC has outperformed all state-of-the-art methods in most bands. The MBSH method, despite of moderate result, has an important advantage: it does not require retraining for sensors with different spectral sensitivities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

REFERENCES

  1. J. Franke, V. Heinzel, and G. Menz, “Assessment of NDVI-differences caused by sensor specific relative spectral response functions,” in IEEE Int. Symp. on Geosci. & Remote Sens., (IGARSS 2006), Denver, Colorado, July 31–Aug. 4, 2006, (IEEE, New York, 2006), pp. 1138–1141.

  2. N. Bollas, E. Kokinou, and V. Polychronos, “Comparison of sentinel-2 and UAV multispectral data for use in precision agriculture: an application from northern greece,” Drones 5, 35 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Fan and Y. Liu, “A comparison of NDVI intercalibration methods,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 38 (19), 5273–5290 (2017).

  4. P. D’Odorico, A. Gonsamo, A. Damm, and M. E. Schaepman, “Experimental evaluation of Sentinel-2 spectral response functions for NDVI time-series continuity,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 51 (3), 1336–1348 (2013).

  5. J. Villaescusa-Nadal, B. Franch, J.-C. Roger, E. Vermote, S. Skakun, and C. Justice, “Spectral adjustment model’s analysis and application to remote sensing data,” IEEE J. Selected Top. Appl. Earth Observations & Remote Sens. 12 (3), 1–12 (2019).

  6. D. Scheffler, K. Segl, and D. Frantz, “Spectral harmonization and red edge prediction of Landsat-8 to Sentinel-2 using land cover optimized multivariate regressors,” Remote Sens. Environment 241 (2020).

  7. G. D. Finlayson, M. Mackiewicz, and A. Hurlbert, “Color correction using root-polynomial regression,” IEEE Trans. on Image Process. 24 (5), 1460 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kordecki, “Practical testing of irradiance-independent camera color calibration,” in Proc. Eleventh Int. Conf. on Machine Vision, Munich, (ICMV), Nov. 13, 2018 (SPIE, 2019), Vol. 11041.

  9. N. A. Firsov, V. V. Podlipnov, P. P. Nikolaev, S. V. Mashkov, P. A. Ishkin, R. V. Skidanov, and A. V. Nikonorov, “Neural network classification of hyper spectral images of vegetation with formation of the training selection on the basis of the adaptive vegetative index,” Komp’yut. Opt. 45, 887–896 (2021).

  10. G. Chander, N. Mishra, D. L. Helder, D. B. Aaron, A. Angal, T. Choi, and D. R. Doelling, “Applications of spectral band adjustment factors (SBAF) for cross-calibration,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens. 51 (3), 1267–1281 (2012).

  11. D. P. Nikolaev, I. A. Konovalenko, and P. P. Nikolaev, “The multiplicative closed spectral models in tasks of the color analysis,” Sensor. Sist. 36, 153–182 (2022).

  12. Sentinel2A. Source: <https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-2>.

  13. Parrot Sequoia+. Source: <https://www.mapping-solutions.co.uk/downloads/data/pdf/m2.pdf>.

  14. R. Bird and C. Riordan, “Simple solar spectral model for direct and diffuse irradiance on horizontal and tilted planes at the earths’s surface for cloudless atmosphere,” NREL Tech. Report (1984).

  15. N. Flood, “Continuity of reflectance data between landsat-7 ETM+ and landsat-8 OLI, for both topof-atmosphere and surface reflectance: A study in the Australian landscape,” Remote Sens. 6, 7952–7970 (2014).

  16. A. Shabanov, S. A. Gladilin, and E. A. Shvets, “Optical-to-SAR image registration using a combination of CNN descriptors and cross-correlation coefficient,” in Proc. Twelfth Int. Conf. on Machine Vision Amsterdam, Nov. 16–18, 2019 (ICMV, 2019).

  17. L. M. Teplyakov, I. A. Kunina, and A. P. Gladkov, “Visual localization of aerial photographs on the vector map with use of color-textural segmentation,” Sensor. Sist. 32, 26–34 (2018).

  18. V. V. Volkov and E. A. Shvets, “Data set and method for assessment of algorithms of comparison of optical and radar images on the basis of steady points,” Inf. Tekhnol. & Vychislit. Sist., No. 2, 44–57 (2021).

  19. V. V. Volkov, “Modifying of a method of search and deskribe of steady points of sift for comparison of optical and radar images,” Sensor. Sist. 36, 349–365 (2022).

  20. E. Vermote and S. Kotchenova, “Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces,” Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 113 (D23) (2008).

  21. R. Kokaly, R. Clark, G. Swayze, K. Livo, T. Hoefen, N. Pearson, R. Wise, W. Benzel, H. Lowers, R. Driscoll, and A. Klein, USGS Spectral Library, Version 7, Data (2017).

  22. EO-1 (Earth Observing-1). Source: <https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/eo-1#eo-1-earthobserving-1>.

  23. Airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS). Source: <https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/>.

  24. HyMap. Source: <https://airbornescience.nasa.gov/ instrument/HyMap>.

  25. APEX. Source: <https://apex-esa.org/en/apex>.

  26. AISA Eagle/Hawk. Source: <http://arsf.nerc.ac.uk/ instruments/specim.asp>.

  27. W. Holmgren, C. Hansen, and M. Mikofski, “pvlib python: a python package for modeling solar energy systems,” J. Open Source Software 3 (29), 884 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Logie and C. Coburn, “An investigation of the spectral and radiometric characteristics of low-cost digital cameras for use in UAV remote sensing,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (15-16), 4891–4909 (2018).

  29. Parrot Sequoia+ sensitivities. Source: <https:// www.mapping-solutions.co.uk/downloads/data/pdf/m2. pdf>.

  30. K. Sakowska, L. Vescovo, B. Marcolla, R. Juszczak, J. Olejnik, and D. Gianelle, “Monitoring of carbon dioxide fluxes in a subalpine grassland ecosystem of the Italian Alps using a multispectral sensor”, Biogeosciences 11, 4695–4712 (2014).

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-61-47089.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. L. Nurmukhametov, D. S. Sidorchuk, I. A. Konovalenko, A. V. Nikonorov or M. A. Gracheva.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Chikishev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nurmukhametov, A.L., Sidorchuk, D.S., Konovalenko, I.A. et al. Spectral Harmonization of UAV and Satellite Data for the Needs of Precision Agriculture. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 67 (Suppl 2), S275–S282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922140054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922140054

Keywords:

Navigation