Abstract
The operation of a fusion reactor on a fuel alternative to the D–T (D–D, Cat–DD, D–3He, p–11B, and p–6Li) requires a higher fuel mixture temperature and a longer energy confinement time in the plasma. It is shown that for a fixed fusion reaction power, an increase in the plasma parameters peaking reduces the power required for additional plasma heating. In addition, the peaking of the plasma parameters reduces the radiation loss in the plasma. All this softens the requirements to the operation conditions of fusion reactors.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
I. N. Golovin and B. B. Kadomtsev, At. Energ. 81 (5), 364 (1996).
M. Ni, Y. Wang, B. Yuan, J. Jiang, and Y. Wu, Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 2422 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.043
M. Kovari, M. Coleman, I. Cristescu, and R. Smith, Nucl. Fusion 58, 026010 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa9d25
Yu. V. Gott, Plasma Phys. Rep. 47, 781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X21080043
P. E. Stott, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47, 1305 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/47/8/011
A. Yu. Chirkov, J. Fusion Energy 32, 208 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-012-9554-0
D. C. Baxter, A. E. Dabiri, D. Dobrott, J. E. Glancy, H. Gurol, W. K. Hagan, J. B. McBride, S. Tamor, and R. N. Cherdack, Fusion Sci. Technol. 4, 246 (1983). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A22876
K. Evans, Jr., C. C. Baker, J. N. Brooks, R. G. Clemmer, D. A. Ehst, P. A. Finn, H. Herman, J. Jung, R. F. Mattas, B. Misra, D. L. Smith, H. C. Stevens, L. R. Turner, R. B. Wehrle, K. M. Barry, et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 4, 226 (1983). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST4-2P1-226
A. Yu. Chirkov and V. I. Khvesyuk, Fusion Technol. 39, 406 (2001). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST01-A11963491
S. V. Ryzhkov, Fusion Sci. Technol. 55, 157 (2009). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST09-A7004
M. H. Redi, S. J. Zweben, and G. Bateman, Fusion Technol. 13, 57 (1988). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST88-A25085
V. P. Pastukhov and D. V. Smirnov, JETP Lett. 114, 208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364021160086
J. D. Tubbing, B. Balrt, D. V. Bartlett, C. D. Challis, S. Corti, R. D. Gill, C. Gormezano, C. W. Gowers, M. Von Hellermann, M. Hugon, J. J. Jacquinot, H. Jaeckel, P. Kupschus, K. Lawson, H. Morsi, et al., Nucl. Fusion 31 (5), 839 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/31/5/003
D. R. Mikkelsen, K. M. McGuire, G. L. Schmidt, and S. J. Zweben, Nucl. Fusion 35, 521 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/35/5/I03
K. Ida, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, S. Hidekuma, Y. Miura, H. Kawashima, M. Mori, T. Matsuda, N. Suzyki, H. Tamai, and T. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 182 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.182
Yu. D. Pavlov, Yu. N. Dnestrovskij, A. A. Borshegovskij, V. V. Chistyakov, A. Yu. Dnestrovskij, M. M. Dremin, Yu. V. Gott, S. A. Grashin, E. P. Gorbunov, V. A. Zhuravlev, L. N. Khimchenko, A. V. Khramenkov, A. Ya. Kislov, S. V. Krylov, V. A. Krupin, et al., Proc. 28th EPS Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics (Portugal, Madeira, Funchal, June 18–22, 2001), P4-020, ECA V.25A, 1409.
F. Wising, D. Anderson, M. Lisak, and M. Benda, Fusion Technol. 25, 290 (1994). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST94-A3
K. M. McGuire, H. Adler, P. Alling, C. Ancher, H. Anderson, J. L. Anderson, J. W. Anderson, V. Arunasalam, G. Ascione, D. Ashcroft, C. W. Barnes, G. Barnes, S. Batha, G. Bateman, M. Beer, et al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 2176 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871303
J. Kesner and R. W. Conn, Nucl. Fusion 16, 397 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/16/3/002
B. Khosrowpour and N. Nassiri-Mofakhan, J. Fusion Energy 35, 513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-016-0084-z
T. Simko and M. Gray, World Future Rev. 6, 158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756714536142
L. J. Wittenberg, E. N. Cameron, G. L. Kulcinski, S. H. Ott, J. F. Santarius, G. I. Sviatoslavsky, I. N. Sviatoslavsky, and H. E. Thompson, Fusion Technol. 12, 2230 (1992). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29718
G. L. Kulcinski and H. Y. Schmitt, Proc. 2nd Annual Lunar Development Conf. “Return to the Moon II” (Las Vegas, July 20–21 July, 2000).
G. L. Kulcinski, R. P. Ashley, J. F. Santarius, G. Piefer, and K. Murali, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on the Exploration and Utilisation of the Moon (ICEUM-4), July 10–14, 2000, ESA SP-462.
J. Bahmani, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 16672 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.107
S. V. Putvinski, D. D. Ryutov, and P. N. Yushmanov, Nucl. Fusion 59, 076018 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab1a60
J. Bahmani, B. Eslami, and F. M. Jafari, Int. J. Phys. Sci. 12, 194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2017.4639
A. B. Kukushkin, P. V. Minashin, and V. S. Neverov, Proc. 22nd IAEA Fussion Energy Conf. (Geneva, 2008), TH/P3-10.
M. Mahdavi and T. Koohrokhi, Pramana 74, 377 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-010-0034-7
F. Albajar, M. Bornatici, and F. Engelmann, Nucl. Fusion 49, 115017 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/49/11/116017
Y. Xu, K. Takahashi, S. Goriely, M. Arnould, M. Ohta, and H. Utsunomiya, Nucl. Phys. A 918, 61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.09.007
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are obliged to express their gratitude of A.B. Kukushkin, P.V. Minashin, V.P. Pastukhov, and A.Yu. Chirkov for useful advices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by N. Wadhwa
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
For the main five fusion reactions (D–T, D–D, Cat–DD, D–3He, and 3He–3He), the rate coefficient of the reaction with an error that does not exceed 10% as a rule for temperatures 0.086 keV < T < 862 keV can be written in form
where
θ = log10T, temperature T is expressed in kiloelectronvolts, and log10 is the decimal logarithm. Angle brackets indicate averaging over the Maxwell distribution. For the D–T reaction, formula (A.1) holds up to energy of 500 keV.
The values of coefficients ai are given in Table 1.
The approximation was performed using the results from [31].
The power density released in the aforementioned reactions can be written in form
Here, electron concentration ne is expressed in the units of 1014 cm–3, and the rate coefficient is given in the units of 1018 cm3/s. The values of coefficient α are given in Table 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gott, Y.V., Yurchenko, E.I. Effect of the Spatial Distribution of Plasma Parameters on the Operation of a Fusion Reactor. Tech. Phys. 67, 683–691 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784222100012
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784222100012