Abstract
Formulas of efficient relaxation time are obtained for the cases when the free length of electrons is less or comparable with the characteristic dimensions of metallic regions. The frequency dispersion of optical characteristics of spherical bimetallic particles is calculated near plasma resonance in the absence of quantum-size effects. Retaining the style of common description of metallic particles based on the Mie–Drude theories, the frequency dependence of electric dipole polarizability of a two-layered metallic nanosphere was analyzed. The appearance of two polarizability maxima is the result of a difference in core and shell metals. The calculations are conducted for the following particles immersed into teflon: Au@Ag, Ag@Au, Au@Pt, Pt@Au, and Pt@Pd. It is demonstrated that the optical characteristics of bimetallic particles can be controlled by means of changing their composition and volumetric metal content. Cross-sections of absorption and scattering, as well as optical radiation efficiency of the particles in a wide spectrum range are calculated. Possible temperature of bimetallic particles at the absorption of an electromagnetic wave (for the photothermal therapy of malignant tumors) is estimated.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer Science, New York, 2007).
V. Amendola, R. Pilot, M. Frasconi, O. M. Maragò, and M. A. Iatì, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 203002 (2017).
V. I. Balykin and P. N. Melentiev, Phys. Usp. 61, 133 (2018).
A. V. Korotun and A. A. Koval’, Opt. Spectrosc. 127, 1161 (2019).
W. Srituravanich, N. Fang, C. Sun, Q. Luo, and X. Zhan, Nano Lett. 4, 1085 (2004).
U. Schröter and A. Dereux, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125420 (2001).
A. Ambrosio, B. Piccirillo, A. Sasso, and E. Santamato, Opt. Commun. 230, 337 (2004).
S. Nie and S. R. Emory, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 275, 1102 (1997).
B. Špačková, P. Wrobel, M. Bocková, and J. Homola, Proc. IEEE 104, 2380 (2016).
H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, Nat. Mater. 9, 205 (2010).
V. A. Milichko, A. S. Shalin, I. S. Mukhin, A. E. Kovrov, A. A. Krasilin, A. V. Vinogradov, P. A. Belov, and C. R. Simovskii, Phys. Usp. 59, 727 (2016).
E. M. Larsson, C. Langhammer, I. Zorić, and B. Kasemo, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 326, 1091 (2009).
D. J. de Aberasturi, A. B. Serrano-Montes, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 602 (2015).
F. Zarrinkhat, A. F. Najafabadi, and T. Pakizeh, J. Opt. 19, 125003 (2017).
C. Zhang, H. Zhao, L. Zhou, A. E. Schlather, L. Dong, M. J. McClain, D. F. Swearer, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, Nano Lett. 16, 6677 (2016).
C. C. Wang, Y. C. Hsueh, C. Y. Su, C. C. Kei, and T. P. Perng, Nanotechnology 26, 254002 (2015).
M. M. Moskovits, I. Srnová-Šloufová, and B. Vlčková, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 10435 (2002).
N. Valizade-Shahmirzadi and T. Pakizeh, Mater. Res. Express 5, 04538 (2018).
S. Sompech, S. Thaomola, A. Chingsungnoen, and T. Dasri, Mater. Res. Express 6, 026201 (2019).
A. V. Korotun, A. A. Koval’, V. I. Reva, and I. N. Titov, Phys. Met. Metallogr. 120, 1040 (2019).
A. V. Skidanenko, L. A. Avakyan, E. A. Kozinkina, and L. A. Bugaev, Phys. Solid State 60, 2571 (2018).
Z. Gao, K. Deng, X. Wang, M. Miro, and D. Tang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 18243 (2014).
H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981).
U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
N. I. Grigorchuk and P. M. Tomchuk, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085448 (2011).
G. N. Blackman III and D. A. Genov, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115440 (2018).
N. I. Grigorchuk, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29, 3404 (2012).
V. P. Kurbatskii and V. V. Pogosov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 26, 1020 (2000).
L. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 8: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001; Pergamon, New York, 1984).
K. Tanabe, Mater. Lett. 61, 4573 (2007).
R. Ruppin, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 39, 233 (1978).
M. Cini, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 386 (1981).
M. A. Ordal, L. L. Long, R. J. Bell, S. E. Bell, R. R. Bell, R. W. Alexander, Jr., and C. A. Ward, Appl. Opt. 22, 1099 (1983).
W. E. Vargas, Appl. Opt. 56, 1266 (2017).
E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 302, 419 (2003).
N. V. Selina, Nanotechnol. Russ. 14, 451 (2019).
G. Baffou, R. Quidant, and F. J. Garcia de Abajo, ACS Nano 4, 709 (2010).
K. Tanabe, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 15721 (2008).
B. M. Bolotovskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 465 (1957).
M. L. Theye, Phys. Lett. A 25, 764 (1967).
G. R. Henry, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2996 (1972).
I. O. Moiseev, A. A. Yushkanov, and Yu. I. Yalamov, Tech. Phys. 49, 87 (2004).
A. Moroz, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 10641 (2008).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to V.P. Kurbatskii for the discussion of work results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Translated by N. Saetova
CALCULATION OF RELAXATION TIMES
CALCULATION OF RELAXATION TIMES
Surface scattering. For noble metals at room temperature (\({{\ell }^{{{\text{bulk}}}}}\) \( \simeq \) 10–100 nm, de Broglie wavelength of electrons ~0.3 nm), surface irregularities of the atomic scale are noticeable. In this regard, we assume that the electron scattering on the surface of a bimetallic spherical particle is diffuse. The condition for applying the classical approach to the description of scattering is the \(\hbar \omega \) \( \ll \) εF inequality.
Expression for probability of electron scattering by all directions at angles that lie between (θ, θ + dθ) and (φ, φ + dφ) with respect to the tangent plane of the sphere (Fig. 1) is the following:
θ ∈ (0, π/2), φ ∈ (0, 2π).
In fact, this is a vector averaging (free length) \(\vec {\ell }\) by all directions. For “subcritical” angles θ ≤ θ* where cosθ* = Rc/R, and for θ > θ*, the electron scatters in both metals. In this case, we write \(\vec {\ell }\) as the sum of collinear vectors \(\vec {\ell }\) = \({{\vec {\ell }}_{1}}\) + \({{\vec {\ell }}_{2}}\) + \({{\vec {\ell }}_{3}}\) and the average of the sum will be equal to the sum of the averages.
At the transformation of the vector into the following form \({{\vec {\ell }}_{1}}{\text{/}}{{{v}}_{{{\text{F}}{\text{,s}}}}}\) + \({{\vec {\ell }}_{2}}{\text{/}}{{{v}}_{{{\text{F}}{\text{,c}}}}}\) + \({{\vec {\ell }}_{3}}{\text{/}}{{{v}}_{{{\text{F}}{\text{,s}}}}}\), it direction remains the same (scattering on the metal boundary is neglected), and the only length is changed (now the dimensions of time), therefore averaging by directions is conducted in the same way.
The average relaxation time on the surface is determined as:
Then,
Solving the geometrical task, we have a quadratic equation of \(\ell _{1}^{2}\) = \(R_{{\text{c}}}^{2}\) – R2 + \(2{{\ell }_{1}}R\sin \theta \) with the following solution:
and
Extreme transitions transforming bimetallic particles into two different monometallic ones are easier to do at this stage.
Assuming Rc, βc → 0, we have in (A2) θ* → π/2, \({{\ell }_{2}}{\text{/}}{{{v}}_{{{\text{F}}{\text{,c}}}}}\) → 0; result is the following:
Assuming Rc → R, βc → 1, we have in (A2) θ* → 0, (\({{\ell }_{1}}\) + \({{\ell }_{3}}\))/\({{{v}}_{{{\text{F}}{\text{,s}}}}}\) → 0; result is the following:
Calculating integrals in (A2) considering expressions for \({{\ell }_{1}}\), \({{\ell }_{2}}\), and \({{\ell }_{3}}\), we finally obtain:
Radiation damping. Using in formula (8)
and inequality in the area of plasma frequencies ωτeff \( \gg \) 1 and, consequently, replacement of ω → ωbp, we obtain:
1. Case (9). Similarly to (A2), we write
Coefficient of \({{\mathcal{B}}_{{\text{c}}}}\) contains the core volume Vc = 4π\(R_{{\text{c}}}^{3}\)/3 = βcV0, and \({{\mathcal{B}}_{{\text{s}}}}\) coefficient contains the shell volume Vs = 4π(R3 – \(R_{{\text{c}}}^{3}\))/3 = (1 – βc)V0, where V0 = 4πR3/3 is the total volume.
2. Case (10). Then,
As a result of integration in (A5) and (A6), we obtain, respectively, the expressions:
and
Bulk scattering. Keeping the style of calculations in the diffuse approximation, we write:
Assuming Rc, βc → 0, we should set \(\tau _{{\text{c}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}\) → 0. Then, \({{\left\langle {\tau _{{\text{@}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}} \right\rangle }_{R}}\) = \(\tau _{{\text{s}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}\).
Assuming Rc, βc → 1, we should set \(\tau _{{\text{s}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}\) → 0. Then, \({{\left\langle {\tau _{{\text{@}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}} \right\rangle }_{R}}\) = \(\tau _{{\text{c}}}^{{{\text{bulk}}}}\).
When the article has been written, we read the work [43] which considers classic electron scattering in a two-layer spherical particle and a critical angle is introduced in formula (37) (in our work, this is θ* in Fig. 1 and in the Appendix).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korotun, A.V., Pogosov, V.V. On the Calculation of Optical Characteristics and Dimensional Shifts of Surface Plasmons of Spherical Bimetallic Nanoparticles. Phys. Solid State 63, 122–133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783421010133
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783421010133