Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of Type and Configuration of the Atom Probe Tomography Setup with Laser Evaporation on the Data Reconstruction Accuracy

  • ENGINEERING DESIGN OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atom probe tomography (APT) is a tool for detailed chemical composition analysis of advanced structural material nanostructure. The use of different Atomic Probe Tomography (APT) devices requires a certification of these setups prior to conducting research. In this paper a method of comparing APT setups in order to evaluate the influence of the overall system configuration on the accuracy of obtained data is proposed. The collected data comparison is presented for the aluminum alloy Al–3.3Cu–2.5Mn–0.5Zr and structural steel 16Kh12МVSFBR gathered on the APPLE-3D (“PAZL-3D”) setup and on the new ATLAS (“ATLAZ”) unit, created through upgrading the ECOTAP. Comparison of the results confirms the feasibility of carrying out research of the same material on similar setups without significant distortion of the data under its analysis and interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. Martin, A. London, B. Jenkins, S. Hopkin, J. Douglas, P. Styman, and M. Moody, Microsc. Microanal. 23, 227 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. V. Rogozhkin, A. A. Aleev, A. A. Lukyanchuk, A. S. Shutov, O. A. Raznitsyn, and S. E. Kirillov, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 60, 428 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Schlesiger, C. Oberdorfer, R. Wuerz, G. Greiwe, P. Stender, M. Artmeier, P. Pelka, F. Spaleck, and G. Schmitz, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 043703 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Gault, F. Vurpillot, A. Vella, M. Gilbert, A. Menand, D. Blavette, and B. Deconihout, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 043705 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Hono, T. Ohkubo, Y. M. Chen, M. Kodzuka, K.  Ohishi, H. Sepehri-Amin, F. Lia, T. Kinno, S. Tomiya, and Y. Kanitani, Ultramicroscopy 111, 576 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. P. Silaeva, N. S. Shcheblanov, T. E. Itina, A. Vella, J. Houard, N. Sévelin-Radiguet, F. Vurpillot, and B. Deconihout, Appl. Phys. A 110, 703 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. L. Suvorov, S. V. Rogozhkin, A. G. Zaluzhnyj, A. A. Aleev, V. F. Bobkov, S. V. Zajcev, A. V. Karpov, M. A. Kozodaev, B. A. Loginov, and O. N. Makeev, Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Materialoved. Nov. Mater., No. 1 (66), 3 (2006).

  8. S. V. Rogozhkin, A. A. Nikitin, A. A. Khomich, N. A. Iskandarov, V. V. Khoroshilov, A. A. Bogachev, A. A. Lukyanchuk, O. A. Raznitsyn, A. S. Shutov, P. A. Fedin, R. P. Kuibeda, T. V. Kulevoy, A. L. Vasiliev, M. Yu. Presniakov, K. S. Kravchuk, and A. S. Useinov, Phys. At. Nucl. 82 (9), 1239 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O. A. Raznitsyn, A. A. Lukyanchuk, A. S. Shutov, and S. V. Rogozhkin, J. Anal. Chem. 72, 1404 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O. A. Raznitsyn, A. A. Lukyanchuk, A. S. Shutov, S. V. Rogozhkin, and A. A. Aleev, Yad. Fiz. Inzhin. 8, 138 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. V. Rogozhkin, A. A. Aleev, A. A. Lukyanchuk, A. S. Shutov, O. A. Raznitsyn, and S. E. Kirillov, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 60, 428 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Lukyanchuk, S. V. Rogozhkin, O. A. Raznitsyn, A. S. Shutov, and A. A. Aleev, Yad. Fiz. Inzhin. 8, 150 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Shutov, A. A. Lukyanchuk, S. V. Rogozhkin, O. A. Raznitsyn, N. A. Iskandarov, and A. A. Aleev, Yad. Fiz. Inzhin. 8, 141 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. I. Porollo, A. M. Dvoriashin, Yu. V. Konobeev, and F. A. Garner, J. Nucl. Mater. 329–333, 314 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Belov, T. Akopyan, N. Korotkova, P. Shurkin, V. Timofeev, O. Raznitsyn, and T. Sviridova, J. Alloys Compd., 161948 (2021).

  16. N. A. Belov, T. K. Akopyan, N. O. Korotkova, V. N. Timofeev, and P. K. Shurkin, Mater. Lett. 300, 130199 (2021).

  17. F. Danoix, G. Grancher, A. Bostel, and D. Blavette, Ultramicroscopy 107, 734 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Danoix, G. Grancher, A. Bostel, and D. Blavette, Ultramicroscopy 107, 739 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Tang, B. Gault, S. P. Ringer, and J. M. Cairney, Ultramicroscopy 110, 836 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F. D. Geuser, B. Gault, A. Bostel, and F. Vurpillot, Surf. Sci. 601, 536 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Bas, A. Bostel, B. Deconihout, and D. Blavette, Appl. Surf. Sci. 87–88, 298 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. S. Shutov, A. A. Lukyanchuk, S. V. Rogozhkin, O.  A. Raznitsyn A. A. Nikitin, A. A. Aleev, and C. E. Kirillov, Phys. At. Nucl. 82, 1292 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O. Hellman, J. Vandenbroucke, J. Rusing, D. Isheim, and D. Seidman, Microsc. Microanal 6, 437 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. M. Hyde and C. A. English, MRS Proc. 650, R6.6 (2000).

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Atom probe tomography was performed on the equipment of the KAMIKS resource center (http://kamiks. itep.ru/) of NRC “Kurchatov Institute” —ITEP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alikhanov Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 117218, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Lukyanchuk, O. A. Raznitsyn, A. S. Shutov, A. A. Aleev, A. V. Klauz, N. A. Butov, B. V. Rudskoy & S. V. Rogozhkin

  2. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Lukyanchuk, O. A. Raznitsyn, A. S. Shutov, A. A. Aleev, A. V. Klauz & S. V. Rogozhkin

  3. National University of Science and Technology MISIS, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    T. K. Akopyan

Authors
  1. A. A. Lukyanchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. A. Raznitsyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. S. Shutov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. A. Aleev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. V. Klauz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. A. Butov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. V. Rudskoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. T. K. Akopyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. S. V. Rogozhkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Lukyanchuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukyanchuk, A.A., Raznitsyn, O.A., Shutov, A.S. et al. Influence of Type and Configuration of the Atom Probe Tomography Setup with Laser Evaporation on the Data Reconstruction Accuracy. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 84, 2004–2009 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377882112005X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377882112005X

Keywords:

Search

Navigation