Skip to main content
Log in

Study of rlastic and inelastic 11 B +α scattering and search for cluster states of enlarged radius in 11B

  • Nuclei
  • Experiment
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential cross sections for elastic and inelastic 11B + α scattering were measured at the alpha-particle energy of 65 MeV, the inelastic-scattering processes leading to the excitation of known states of 11B up to excitation energies of about 14 MeV. Data on elastic scattering were analyzed together with those that were published earlier for lower energies. The cross sections for inelastic scattering were analyzed on the basis of the distorted-wave method. A modified diffractionmodel was used to determine the root-mean-square radii of excited states. The radii of states whose excitation energies were below about 7MeV were found to agree with radius of the ground state to within 0.1 to 0.15 fm. This result complieswith the traditional idea that the low-lying states of 11B have a shell structure. The possibility that these states belong to the predicted rotational bands, which, if any, are truncated to three states, cannot be ruled out either. The majority of the observed highly excited states are distributed among four rotational bands. The moments of inertia of these bands are close; for the band based on the 3/2 state at E* = 8.56 MeV, they are even higher than those of the Hoyle state in the 12C nucleus. The measured radii of states associated with these bands of 11B are larger than the ground-state radius by 0.7 to 1.0 fm and are also close to the radius of the Hoyle state. The results of the present study agree with the existing predictions that the cluster structure of the 11B nucleus is diverse at high excitation energies. The hypothesis that the 11B nucleus features a “giant” state of size commensurate with those in heavy nuclei was not confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024302 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Suhara and Y. Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054320 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Yamada and Y. Funaki, Phys. Rev. C 82, 064315 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Yamaguchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 034306

  5. A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, and G. Röpke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 192501 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Burtebaev, M. K. Baktybaev, B. A. Duisebaev, R. J. Peterson, and S. B. Sakuta, Phys. At. Nucl. 68, 1303 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Kawabata et al., Phys. Lett. B 646, 6 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. N. Danilov et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 054603 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Demyanova et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 915 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Danilov et al., EP JWeb Conf. 66, 03007 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Abele et al., Z. Phys. A 326, 373 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Goncharov et al., EPJ Web Conf. 66, 03034 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Ogloblin, S. A. Goncharov, Yu. A. Glukhov, A. S. Dem’yanova, M. V. Rozhkov, V. P. Rudakov, and W. H. Trzaska, Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1478 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Ogloblin, T. L. Belyaeva, A. N. Danilov, et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1224, 100 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. Blair, Phys. Rev. 115, 928 (1959).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Ohkubo and Y. Hirabayashi, Phys. Rev. C 70, 041602(R) (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. S. Demyanova et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 2118 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. A 506, 1 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Ogloblin et al., EPJ Web Conf. 66, 02074 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. J. Charity et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 054307 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Sois´ et al., Nucl. Phys. A 742, 271 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Curtis et al., Phys. Rev. C 72, 044320 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Danilov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.N. Danilov, A.S. Demyanova, S.V. Dmitriev, A.A. Ogloblin, T.L. Belyaeva, S.A. Goncharov, Yu.B. Gurov, V.A. Maslov, Yu.G. Sobolev, W. Trzaska, S.V. Khlebnikov, P. Heikkinen, R. Julin, G.P. Tyurin, N. Burtebaev, T. Zholdybayev, 2015, published in Yadernaya Fizika, 2015, Vol. 78, No. 9, pp. 828–844.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danilov, A.N., Demyanova, A.S., Dmitriev, S.V. et al. Study of rlastic and inelastic 11 B +α scattering and search for cluster states of enlarged radius in 11B. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 78, 777–793 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778815060071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778815060071

Keywords

Navigation