Abstract
The existence of the upper critical dimension d c2 = 4 for the Anderson transition is a rigorous consequence of the Bogoliubov theorem on renormalizability of φ4 theory. For d ≥ 4 dimensions, one-parameter scaling does not hold and all existent numerical data should be reinterpreted. These data are exhausted by the results for d = 4, 5 from scaling in quasi-one-dimensional systems and the results for d = 4, 5, 6 from level statistics. All these data are compatible with the theoretical scaling dependences obtained from Vollhardt and Wolfle’s self-consistent theory of localization. The widespread viewpoint that d c2 = ∞ is critically discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields (Nauka, Moscow, 1976; Wiley, New York, 1980).
E. Brezin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Ed. by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. VI.
S. Ma, Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, United States, 1976).
A. Nitzan, K. F. Freed, and M. N. Cohen, Phys. Rev. 15, 4476 (1977).
M. V. Sadovskii, Sov. Phys.—Usp. 24, 96 (1981)
I. M. Suslov, Phys—Usp. 41, 441 (1998).
J. J. M. Verbaarschot and M. R. Zirnbauer, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, 1093 (1985).
M. R. Zirnbauer, cond-mat/9903338.
E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).
I. M. Suslov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys 114(1), 107 (2012).
I. M. Suslov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 118(6), 909 (2014); I. M. Suslov, arXiv:1402.2382.
P. Markos, Acta Phys. Slovaca 56, 561 (2006); P. Markos, cond-mat/0609580.
P. Marko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 115(6), 1075 (2012).
I. Kh. Zharekeshev and B. Kramer, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7, 442 (1998).
A. M. Garcia-Garcia and E. Cuevas, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 75, 174203 (2007).
F. Wegner, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 35, 207 (1979); L. Schäfer and F. Wegner, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 38, 113 (1980). S. Hikami, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 24, 2671 (1981). K. B. Efetov, A. I. Larkin, and D. E. Khmelnitskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 52 (3), 568 (1980); K. B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. 32, 53 (1983).
D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 22, 4666 (1980); D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 699 (1982); D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, in Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences, Ed. by V. M. Agranovich and A. A. Maradudin (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992), Vol. 32.
H. Kunz and R. Souillard, J. Phys., Lett. 44, L506 (1983).
I. M. Suslov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys 81(5), 925 (1995).
I. M. Suslov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys 115(5), 897 (2012).
I. M. Suslov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys 115(6), 1079 (2012).
K. B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 61(3), 606 (1985).
K. B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 66(3), 634 (1987); K. B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 (1), 199 (1988).
M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 34, 6394 (1986); M. R. Zirnbauer, Nucl. Phys. B 265, 375 (1986).
A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 526 (1994).
F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
A. M. Garcia-Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 076404 (2008).
K. B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 56(2), 467 (1982).
M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rep. 385, 69 (2003).
B. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 747 (1983).
H. Kunz and R. Souillard, J. Phys., Lett. 44, L411 (1983).
J. T. Chalker, Physica A (Amsterdam) 167, 253 (1990); T. Brandes, B. Huckestein, and L. Schweitzer, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 5, 633 (1996).
I. M. Suslov, cond-mat/0612654.
J. L. Pichard and G. Sarma, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 14, L127 (1981).
A. MacKinnon and B. Kramer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1546 (1981).
M. Aizenman and S. Warzel, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 9, 291 (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Russian in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 2014, Vol. 146, No. 6, pp. 1272–1281.
Contribution for the JETP special issue in honor of A.F. Andreev’s 75th birthday
The article was translated by the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suslov, I.M. Interpretation of high-dimensional numerical results for the Anderson transition. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 119, 1115–1122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776114120188
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776114120188