Skip to main content
Log in

Explosion of a Minimum-Mass Neutron Star within Relativistic Hydrodynamics

  • Published:
Astronomy Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relativistic hydrodynamics equations are adapted for the spherically symmetric case and the Lagrangian form. They are used to model the explosive disruption of a minimum-mass neutron star—a key ingredient of the stripping model for short gamma-ray bursts. The shock breakout from the neutron star surface accompanied by the acceleration of matter to ultrarelativistic velocities is studied. A comparison with the results of previously published nonrelativistic calculations is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The erratum in the original paper of Hwang and Noh (2016) containing the superfluous factor \(1/\gamma^{2}\) at the second term in square brackets in (25) was corrected here.

REFERENCES

  1. B. P. Abbott et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. I. Blinnikov, I. D. Novikov, T. V. Perevodchikova, and A. G. Polnarev, Sov. Astron. Lett. 10, 177 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. I. Blinnikov, V. S. Imshennik, D. K. Nadyozhin, I. D. Novikov, T. V. Perevodchikova, and A. G. Polnarev, Sov. Astron. 34, 595 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. I. Blinnikov, D. K. Nadyozhin, N. I. Kramarev, and A. V. Yudin, Astron. Rep. 65, 385 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. A. Clark and D. M. Eardley, Astrophys. J. 215, 311 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure (Springer, New York, 2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Haensel and A. Y. Potekhin, Astron. Astrophys. 428, 191 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Hwang and H. Noh, Astrophys. J. 833, 180 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Liebendoerfer, A. Mezzacappa, and K.-F. Thielemann, Phys. Rev. D 63, 104003 (2001).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. K. V. Manukovskii, Astron. Lett. 36, 191 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. I. V. Panov and A. V. Yudin, Astron. Lett. 46, 518 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. M. Siegel, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 203 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Suzuki, and W. Hillebrandt, Astron. Astrophys. 334, 159 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Weinberg, Gravity and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am grateful to the anonymous referees whose remarks contributed significantly to an improvement of this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-29-21019mk).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Yudin.

Additional information

Translated by V. Astakhov

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

ENERGY CONSERVATION IN A STAR

The relativistic equations derived by us look unusual with regard to how the terms with the artificial viscosity \(Q\) appear in them. Usually, the introduction of the latter is actually reduced to an additive to the pressure: \(P\rightarrow P+Q\). In our case, however, there is also an additional contribution to the equation of motion (the last turn in (31)). Furthermore, the right-hand side of the energy equation (24) is not reduced to the form \(Q/\rho_{\mathrm{b}}^{2}(d\rho_{\mathrm{b}}/dt)\) because of the term \(r^{3}\) under the logarithm. Let us demonstrate that, nevertheless, our formulas are quite self-consistent. We will work in the nonrelativistic limit. Let us multiply Eq. (31) by \(v\) and integrate over \(m_{\mathrm{b}}\) throughout the star. On the right we will obtain the term

$$\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{dv^{2}}{dt}dm_{\mathrm{b}}=\frac{dE_{\mathrm{kin}}}{dt},$$
(A.1)

i.e., the total time derivative of the kinetic energy. The gravitational acceleration (20) in the limit under consideration is simply \(a_{\mathrm{G}}={-}Gm_{\mathrm{b}}/r^{2}\). Its integral is

$$-\int\!\frac{vGm_{\mathrm{b}}dm_{\mathrm{b}}}{r^{2}}=\int\!\frac{d}{dt}\!\left(\frac{1}{r}\right)Gm_{\mathrm{b}}dm_{\mathrm{b}}={-}\frac{dE_{\mathrm{grav}}}{dt},$$
(A.2)

where \(E_{\mathrm{grav}}\) is the gravitational energy. We integrate the next term in (31) by parts:

$$-\int\!4\pi r^{2}v\frac{\partial(P+Q)}{\partial m_{\mathrm{b}}}dm_{\mathrm{b}}=$$
(A.3)
$${}=\int\!(P+Q)\frac{d}{dt}\!\left(\!\frac{1}{\rho_{\mathrm{b}}}\!\right)dm_{\mathrm{b}}.$$

The energy equation (24) can be rewritten in an equivalent form:

$$(P+Q)\frac{d}{dt}\!\left(\!\frac{1}{\rho_{\mathrm{b}}}\!\right)={-}\frac{dE}{dt}+\frac{3Qv}{r\rho_{\mathrm{b}}}.$$
(A.4)

Substituting this expression into (A.3), we will find that the second term on the right in (A.4) is canceled out with the last term in the equation of motion (31) during its integration. There remains only the total derivative of the star’s internal energy \(E_{\mathrm{int}}=\int Edm_{\mathrm{b}}\). Thus, we obtained the law of conservation of the star’s total energy in the form \(dE_{\mathrm{tot}}/dt=0\), where \(E_{\mathrm{tot}}=E_{\mathrm{kin}}+E_{\mathrm{grav}}+E_{\mathrm{int}}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yudin, A.V. Explosion of a Minimum-Mass Neutron Star within Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Astron. Lett. 48, 311–320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377372206007X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377372206007X

Keywords:

Navigation