Skip to main content
Log in

Salmoniformes: A Marine or Freshwater Origin?

  • ORIGINAL PAPERS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long-lasting discussion about the marine or freshwater genesis of Salmoniformes is still unsettled. No convincing evidence of either point of view has been found so far. The arguments for the freshwater origin of salmoniforms are analyzed using the “probabilistic” method of phylogenetic reconstruction and genetic approach. The analysis shows that the arguments set forth cannot be considered as evidence for the freshwater genesis of this taxon. The lack of actual facts and theoretical bases of the ancient freshwater residence of Salmoniformes makes it difficult to prove that they acquired a freshwater lifestyle in the Cretaceous–Paleocene just to become anadromous again in the Eocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Atlas presnovodnykh ryb Rossii (Atlas of Russian Freshwater Fises), Reshetnikov, Yu.S., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 2002, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berg, L.S., On the origin of trout and other freshwater salmonids, in Pamyati akademika S.A. Zernova (In Memory of Academician S.A. Zernov), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1948, pp. 159–172.

  3. Berg, L.S., The system of pisciforms and fishes, extant and fossil, Tr. Zool. Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 85–517.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vasiliev, V.P., Evolyutsionnaya kariologiya ryb (Evolutionary Karyology of Fish), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.

  5. Vladimirov, V.I., Trout from diatom deposits of the Pliocene in Armenia, Dokl. Arm. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1946, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gladenkov, A.Yu. and Gladenkov, Yu.B., Onset of connections between the Pacific and Arctic Oceans through the Bering Strait in the Neogene, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2004, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glubokovsky, M.K., Evolyutsionnaya biologiya lososevykh ryb (Evolutionary Biology of Salmonids), Moscow: Nauka, 1995.

  8. Darlington, P.J., Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals, New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dolganov, V.N., On the genesis of fish of the order Salmoniformes, Russ. J. Mar. Biol. (in press).

  10. Zhivotovsky, L.A., Genetic history of salmonid fishes of the genus Oncorhynchus, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415050105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zyuganov, V.V., The family of sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) of the world fauna, in Fauna SSSR. T. 5, vyp. 1: Ryby (Fauna USSR, vol. 5, no. 1: Fishes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1991.

  12. Kafanov, L.I. and Kudryashov, V.A., Morskaya biogeografiya (Marine Biogeography), Moscow: Nauka, 2000.

  13. Kirillov, A.F. and Knizhin, I.B., Ichthyofauna of the Lena River (Laptev Sea Basin): Modern composition and historical formation, J. Ichthyol., 2014, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945214040031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Monin, A.S., Populyarnaya istoriya Zemli (Popular History of Earth), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

  15. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, Hoboken: Wiley, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolsky, G.V., Chastnaya ikhtiologiya (Special Ichthyology), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1971.

  17. Sychevskaya, E.K., Iskopayemyye shchukovidnyye SSSR i Mongolii (Fossil Esociformes from the USSR and Mongolia), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.

  18. Sychevskaya, E.K., Presnovodnaya paleogenovaya ikhtiofauna SSSR i Mongolii (Freshwater Paleogene Ichthyofauna of the USSR and Mongolia), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

  19. Sychevskaya, E.K., Freshwater fish from the Neogene deposits of Primorsky Krai, in Tezisy dokladov 14-go Tikhookeanskogo nauchnogo kongressa, Komitet V (Proc. 14th Pac. Sci. Congr., Comm. V), Khabarovsk, 1979, vol. 2, p. 113.

  20. Ushakov, S.A. and Yasamanov, N.A., Dreyf materikov i klimaty Zemli (Continental Drift and Climates of Earth), Moscow: Mysl’, 1984.

  21. Frolov, S.V., Izmenchivost’ i evolyutsiya kariotipov lososevykh ryb (Karyotype Variability and Evolution in Salmonidae), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2000.

  22. Chereshnev, I.A., Volobuev, V.V., Shestakov, A.V., and Frolov, S.V., Lososevidnye ryby Severo-Vostoka Rossii (Salmonids in the Northeast of Russia), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2002.

  23. Yakovlev, V.N., Distribution of freshwater fishes in the Neogene Holarctic and zoogeographical zoning, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1961, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alexandrou, M.A., Swartz, B.A., Matzke, N.J., and Oakley, T.H., Genome duplication and multiple evolutionary origins of complex migratory behavior in Salmonidae, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2013, vol. 69, pp. 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavender, T.M., Review of the fossil history of North American freshwater fishes, in The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes, Hocutt, C.H. and Wiley, E.O., Eds., New York: Wiley, 1986, pp. 699–724.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cavender, T.M. and Miller, R.R., Smilodonichthys rastrosus: A New Pliocene Salmonid Fish from Western United States, Bulletin of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Oregon, Eugene: Univ. of Oregon, 1972, no. 18.

  27. Dodson, J.J., Laroche, J., and Lecomte, F., Contrasting evolutionary pathways of anadromy in euteleostean fishes, in Challenges for Diadromous Fishes in a Dynamic Global Environment, Bethesda: Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 2009, no. 69, pp. 63–77.

  28. Grande, L., The first Esox (Esocidae: Teleostei) from the Eocene Green River Formation, and a brief review of esocid fishes, J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 1999, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ishiguro, N.B., Miya, M., and Nishida, M., Basal euteleostean relationships: A mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the “Protacanthopterygii”, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2003, vol. 27, pp. 476–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, G.D. and Patterson, C., Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes, in Interrelationships of Fishes, Stiassny, M.L.J., Parenti, L.R., and Johnson, G.D., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 1996, pp. 251–332.

    Google Scholar 

  31. López, J.A., Chen, W.-J., and Orti, G., Esociform phylogeny, Copeia, 2004, no. 3, pp. 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1643/CG-03-087R1

  32. Marincovich, L. and Gladenkov, A.Y., New evidence for the age of Bering Strait, Quat. Sci. Rev., 2001, vol. 20, nos. 1–3, pp. 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00113-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McDowal, R.M., A recent marine ancestry for diadromous fishes? Sometimes yes, but mostly no!, Environ. Biol. Fishes, 1993, vol. 37, pp. 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McPhail, J.D., The Coregonus autumnalis complex in Alaska and northwestern Canada, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 1966, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1139/f66-010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson, G.J., Gill arches of some teleostean fishes of the families Salangidae and Argentinidae, Jpn. J. Ichthyol., 1970, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 61–66. https://doi.org/10.11369/JJI1950.17.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, New York: Wiley, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19880730122

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ohno, S., The enormous diversity in genome sizes of fish as a reflection of nature’s extensive experiments with gene duplication, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 1970, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Patterson, C., Bony fishes, in Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution, Prothero D.R. and Schoch R.M., Eds., Short Courses in Paleontology, vol. 7, Knoxville: Paleontol. Soc., Univ. of Tennessee, 1994, pp. 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2475263000001264

  39. Rosen, D.E., Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1974, vol. 153, art. 2, pp. 265–326.

  40. Rosen, D.E., Teleostean interrelationships, morphological function and evolutionary inference, Am. Zool., 1982, vol. 22, pp. 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shed’ko, S.V., Ginatulina, L.K., Parpura, I.Z., and Ermolenko, A.V., Evolutionary and taxonomic relationships among Far-Eastern salmonid fishes inferred from mitochondrial DNA divergence, J. Fish. Biol., 1996, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith, G.R., Swirydchuk, K., Kimmel, P.G., and Wilkinson, B.H., Fish biostratigraphy of Late Miocene to Pleistocene sediments of the Western Snake river plain, Idaho, in Cenozoic Geology of Idaho, Bull. - Idaho, Bur. Mines Geol., Idaho: Univ. of Idaho, 1982, no. 26, pp. 519–541.

  43. Stearley, R.F., Historical ecology of Salmonidae, with special reference to Oncorhynchus, in Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, Mayden, R.L., Ed., Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 622–658.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stearley, R.F. and Smith, G.R., Salmonid fishes from Mio-Pliocene lake sediments in the western Snake River plain and the Great Basin, in Fishes of the Mio-Pliocene Western Snake River Plain And Vicinity, Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan, 2016, vol. 204, no. 1.

  45. Tomoda, Y., Kodera, H., Nakajima, T., and Yasuno, T., Fossil freshwater fishes from Japan, Mem. Geol. Soc. Jpn., 1977, no. 14, pp. 221–243.

  46. Ueno, T., Kimura, S., and Hasegawa, Y., Freshwater fishes from Late Cenozoic deposits in Kusu Basin, Oita Prefecture, Japan, Mem. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., 1975, no. 8, pp. 57–70.

  47. Wilson, M.V.H., Middle Eocene Freshwater Fishes from British Columbia, Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum, 1977, vol. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson, M.V.H. and Williams, R.R.G., Phylogenetic, biogeographic and ecological significance of early fossil records of North American freshwater teleostean fishes, in Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, Mayden, R.L., Ed., Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 224–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study did not have any sponsorship support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Dolganov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The author declare that he has no conflicts of interest.

Statement of the welfare of animals. The article does not contain any studies involving humans or animals in experiments performed by the author.

Additional information

Translated by E. Shvetsov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dolganov, V.N. Salmoniformes: A Marine or Freshwater Origin?. Russ J Mar Biol 48, 541–546 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074022070033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074022070033

Keywords:

Navigation