Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal mining rates revisited: Managing mining equipment and geological risk at a given mine setup

  • Mineral Mining Technology
  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed integer programming formulation dealing with the effective minimisation of risk incurred when optimizing mining production rates in such a way that production targets are met in the presence of geological uncertainty. This is developed through the concept of a “stable solution domain” that provides all feasible combinations of ore and waste extraction for the ultimate pit limit of a given deposit, independent of the geological risk. The proposed formulation provides an optimal annual extraction rate, together with the optimal utilization of a mining fleet and an equipment acquisition program. This solution eliminates unnecessary capital expenses and is feasible under all geological scenarios. The mathematical programming model is detailed and tested at a gold deposit. The results are used as input to a production schedule design and are compared to the schedule generated using a constant mining rate; the comparison shows that about 40% of equipment acquisition can be delayed for 7 years and mill demand still be met, thus maximizing profit and minimizing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, Y., Production Scheduling: Technical Overview, Computer Methods for the 80’s, A. Weiss (Ed.), New York: AIME, New York, 1979. pp. 610–614.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dagdelen, K. and Johnson, T., Optimum Open Pit Mine Production Scheduling by Lagrangian Parameterization, Proc. 19th APCOM Symposium of the Society of Mining Engineers, 1986. pp. 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbaro, R., and Ramani, R., Generalized Multi-Period MIP Model for Production Scheduling and Processing Facilities Selection and Location, Mining Engineering, 1986, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whittle, J. and Rozman, L., Open Pit Design in 90’s, Proc. Mining Industry Optimization Conf., AusIMM, Sydney, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whittle, J., A Decade of Open Pit Mine Planning and Optimization–The Craft of Turning Algorithms into Packages, APCOM'99 Computer Applications in the Minerals Industries 28th International Symposium, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado USA, 1999. pp. 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tolwinski, B., Scheduling Production for Open Pit Mines, Computer Applications in the Minerals Industries International Symposium, 1998. pp. 651–662.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Godoy, M., The Effective Management of Geological Risk in Long-Term Production Scheduling of Open Pit Mines, PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stone, P., Froyland, G., Menabde, M., Law, B., Pasyar, R., and Monkhouse, P., Blended Iron-Ore Mine Planning Optimization at Yandi Western Australia, AusIMM Spectrum Series, 2005. vol. 14. pp. 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jewbali, A., Modelling Geological Uncertainty for Stochastic Short-Term Production Scheduling in Open Pit Metal Mines, PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Menabde, M., Froyland, G., Stone, P. And Yeates, G., Mining Schedule Optimization for Conditionally Simulated Orebodies, AusIMM Spectrum Series 14, 2007. pp. 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Godoy, M., and Dimitrakopoulos, R., A Risk Quantification Framework for Strategic Mine Planning: Method and Application, J. Min. Sci., 2011, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meagher, C., On the Directed Cut Polyhedra and Open Pit Mining, PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hustrulid, W. and Kuchta, M., Open-Pit Mine Planning and Design, vol. 1 A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfiled, 1995. pp. 512–544.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rzhenevisky, V., Open Pit Mining, Leningrad: Nedra, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, S., and Ramani, R., Optimization Models for Scheduling Ore and Waste Production in Open Pit Mines, 23rd APCOM, SME of the AIME, 1992. pp. 781–791.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dagdelen, K. and Johnson, T., Optimum Open Pit Mine Production Scheduling by Lagrangian Parameterization, 19th APCOM Symposium, SME-AIME, Littleton, Colorado, 1984. pp 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emery, X., Arroyo, D., and Peláez, M., Simulating Large Gaussian Random Vectors Subject to Inequality Constraints by Gibbs Sampling, Mathematical Geosciences, 2014. vol. 46, no 3, pp. 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Godoy, M., and Dimitrakopoulos, R., Managing Risk and Waste Mining in Long-Term Production Scheduling of Open-Pit Mines, SME Transactions, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. F. Del Castillo.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Castillo, M.F., Godoy, M.C. & Dimitrakopoulos, R. Optimal mining rates revisited: Managing mining equipment and geological risk at a given mine setup. J Min Sci 51, 785–798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739115040165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739115040165

Keywords

Navigation