Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ecology of Sibling Species of the Common Vole (Microtus arvalis Pall. and Microtus rossiaemeridionalis Ognev) at the Northern Limit of Its Range

  • ZOOLOGY
  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A characteristic based on long-term (1958–2018) field and stationary studies is given for the abundance and the demographic structure of the population, the course of reproduction, nutrition, and other ecological features common to twin species of the common vole (Microtus arvalis sensu lato). It has been found that the northern boundary of their distribution in the past sixty years first moved north and reached 63°40′ N, and then it also quickly retreated to the south. A sharp reduction in sown areas, primarily cereals caused by the reorientation of agriculture from grain to dairy and vegetables is the reason for the latter. This, as well as the replacement of common voles with native species of rodents (tundra, water, short-tailed field, and bank voles), caused a sharp decrease in the number and narrowing of the range of species in the eastern regions of Fennoscandia. The main place in the diet of twin species is occupied by the green mass of herbaceous plants (the occurrence rate is 72%), the smaller one is occupied by seeds (25%), and the bark of trees is a very rare component (3%). Reproduction in the conditions of the northern periphery of the range proceeds only during one rather limited spring–summer season. The age and sex composition of the population is heterogeneous and varies seasonally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Airapet’yants, A.E., Insectivores and rodents, in Zveri Leningradskoi oblasti (Animals of the Leningrad Oblast), Leningrad: Leningr. Gos. Univ., 1970, pp. 47–165.

  2. Bashenina, N.V., Ekologiya obyknovennoi polevki i nekotorye cherty ee geograficheskoi izmenchivosti (Ecology of the Common Vole and Some Features of Its Geographical Variability), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1962.

  3. Bashenina, N.V., Materials on the ecology of small mammals in the European taiga zone, Uch. Zap. Permsk. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 1968, vol. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bashenina, N.V., Puti adaptatsii myshevidnykh gryzunov (Ways of Adaptations of Muroid Rodents), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

  5. Baskevich, M.I., Potapov, S.G., Okulova, N.M., Sapel’nikov, S.F., Vlasov, A.A., et al., On the distribution and variability of sibling species Microtus arvalis sensu lato (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in the Central Chernozem region according to chromosomal and molecular genetic data, Zool. Zh., 2009, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baskevich, M.I., Okulova, N.M., Potapov, S.G., Mironova, T.A., Sapel’nikov, S.F., et al., New data on the distribution of sibling species and hybridization of 46 chromosome forms of Microtus arvalis sensu lato (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in the Central Chernozem Region, Zool. Zh., 2012, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 994–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blotskaya, E.S. and Gaiduk, V.E., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya melkikh mlekopitayushchikh (Population Ecology of Small Mammals), Brest: Brest. Gos. Univ., 2004.

  8. Bobrov, V.V., Varshavskii, A.A., and Khlyap, L.A., Chuzherodnye vidy mlekopitayushchikh v ekosistemakh Rossii (Alien Species of Mammals in the Ecosystems of Russia), Moscow: KMK, 2008.

  9. Dobrokhotov, B.P., Baranovskii, P.M., and Demidova, T.N., Peculiarities of stationary distribution of sibling species Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis (Rodentia, Microtinae) and their role in natural foci of meadow field type tularemia, Zool. Zh., 1985, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ermolaeva, E.Z., Karaseva, E.V., and Telitsyna, A.Yu., Features of the habitat of small mammals in the Botanical Garden of Moscow State University (Vorob’evy Gory), in Zhivotnye v gorode. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Proc. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Animals in the City”), Moscow, 2000, pp. 34–37.

  11. Formozov, A.N., Ocherk ekologii myshevidnykh gryzunov, nositelei tulyaremii (Essay on the Ecology of Muroid Rodents–Carriers of Tularemia), Moscow, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, F., The causality of microtine cycles in Germany, J. Wildl. Manage., 1957.

  13. Gromov, I.M. and Polyakov, I.Ya., Microtinae voles, in Fauna SSSR (Fauna of the USSR), Leningrad: Nauka, 1977.

  14. Gromov, I.M. and Erbaeva, M.A., Zaitseobraznye i gryzuny. Mlekopitayushchie fauny Rossii (Lagomorphs and Rodents. Mammals of the Fauna of Russia), St. Petersburg, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isakov, Yu.A., Materials on the fauna of mammals in Central and North Karelia, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1939, vol. 48, nos. 2–3.

  16. Karaseva, E.V. and Kucheruk, V.V., Study of the mobility of common voles by tagging, in Mater. III ekol. konf., Tez. dokl. (Proc. 3rd Ecol. Conf., Abstract of Papers), Kiev: Kiev. Univ., 1954, part 3, pp. 80–83.

  17. Karaseva, E.V., Telitsina, A.Yu., and Samoilov, B.L., Mlekopitayushchie Moskvy v proshlom i nastoyashchem (Mammals of Moscow in the Past and Present), Moscow: Nauka, 1999.

  18. Karaseva, E.V., Telitsyna, A.Yu., and Zhigal’skii, O.A., Metody izucheniya gryzunov v polevykh usloviyakh (Methods for Studying Rodents in the Field), Moscow: LKI, 2008.

  19. Keller, A., Determination des mammiferes de la uisse par leur pelage. IV. Crecetidae et Muridae, Rev. Uisse Zool., 1981, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 463–473.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khlyap, L.A. and Warshavsky, A.A., Synanthropic and agrophilic rodents as invasive alien mammals, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2010, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krebs, C.J. and Myers, J.H., Population cycles of small mammals, Adv. Ecol. Res. (London), 1974, vol. 8, pp. 267–399.

  22. Lapin’, I.M., Biologiya i parazitofauna melkikh lesnykh mlekopitayushchikh Latviiskoi SSR (Biology and Parasite Fauna of Small Forest Mammals in the Latvian SSR), Riga, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malygin, V.M., Stationary dwelling of sibling species of the common vole, Ekologiya, 1974, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malygin, V.M., Sistematika obyknovennykh polevok (Systematics of Common Voles), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

  25. Malygin, V.M. and Ryabov, S.V., Distribution and biology of sibling species of the common vole in the zoomedical aspect, Dezinfekts. Delo, 2013, no. 4, pp. 27–35.

  26. Malygin, V.M., Baskevich, M.I., and Khlyap, L.A., Invasions of the common vole sibling species, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2020, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marvin, M.Ya., Mlekopitayushchie Karelii (Mammals of Karelia), Petrozavodsk, 1959.

  28. Meier, M.N., Golenishchev, N.M., Rabdzhabli, S.I., and Sablina, O.E., Serye polevki fauny Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii (Gray Voles of the Fauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories), Tr. Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, St. Petersburg, 1996, р. 320.

  29. Migula, P., Gano, B., Stepin, Z., Bugdal, U., Ocena zageszczenia i prizeplyw energii przez populoacje drobnych (Male Pleninu), Prz. Zool., 1975, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 467–474.

  30. Muntyanu, A.I., Savin, A.I., Patrashku, V.I., and Sytnik, V.L., Fluctuations in abundance in common vole populations, in Vliyanie antrop. transf. landshafta na naselenie nazem. pozv. zhivotnykh. Tez. Vses. soveshch. (Impact of Anthropogenic Transformations of Landscape on the population of Terrestrial Vertebrates), Moscow, 1987, part 2, pp. 26–27.

  31. Naumov, N.P., Ocherki sravnitel’noi ekologii myshevidnykh gryzunov (Essays on the Comparative Ecology of Muroid Rodents), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1948.

  32. Nazarova, I.V., Ecological and morphological sketch of gray voles of the Volga–Kama region, Izv. Kazan. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1958, no. 6, pp. 27–41.

  33. Neronov, V.N., Khlyap, L., Tupikova, N.V., and Warshavskii, A.A., Formation of rodent communities in arable lands of Northern Eurasia, Russ. J. Ecol., 2001, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 326–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Novikov, G.A., Polevye issledovaniya ekologii nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh (Field Studies of the Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates), Leningrad: Sov. Nauka, 1953.

  35. Ognev, S.I., Zveri SSSR i prilezhashchikh stran (Animals of the USSR and Neighboring Countries), vol. 7: Gryzuny (Rodents), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1950.

  36. Pekarchik, K., Research on the formation of forecasts for the emergence and development of pests of agricultural crops in Poland, Tr. VIZR, 1983, no. 18, pp. 338–341.

  37. Snigirevskaya, E.M., Ecology and economic significance of muroid rodents in the broad-leaved forests of the Zhiguli Upland, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Leningrad, 1954.

  38. Sokolov, V.E., Bashenina, N.V., Malygin, V.M., et al., Obyknovennaya polevka: vidy-dvoiniki. Microtus arvalis. Pallas. 1779, M. rossiaemeridionalis (Common Vole: Sibling Species. Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779, M. rossiaemeridionalis), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.

  39. Taurin’sh, E.Ya., Dynamics of reproduction of field muroid rodents in the Latvian SSR in 1948–1962, in Prognoz v zashchite rastenii ot vreditelei i boleznei (Forecast in Plant Protection Against Pests and Diseases), Riga: Akad. Nauk Latv., 1964, pp. 239–261.

  40. Tupikova, N.V., Khlyap, L.A., and Varshavskii, A.A., Rodents of the fields of the North-Eastern Palearctic, Zool. Zh., 2000, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 480–494.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vinogradov, B.S., Materialy po dinamike fauny myshevidnykh gryzunov SSSR (Materials on the Dynamics of the Fauna of Muroid Rodents of USSR), Leningrad, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yakimova, A.E., Results of monitoring of small mammals in Central Karelia, Tr. Karel. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Biogeogr., 2018, no. 1, pp. 67–80.

  43. Zhigarev, I.A., Changes in the population density of muroid rodents under the influence of recreational pressure in the south of the Moscow region, Zool. Zh., 1993, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhigarev, I.A., Melkie mlekopitayushchie rekreatsionnykh i estestvennykh lesov Podmoskov’ya (Small Mammals of Recreational and Natural Forests of the Moscow Region), Moscow: Prometei, 2004.

  45. Zhigarev, I.A., Zhigarev, D.I., Alpatov, V.V., Lapkovskii, V.V., Malygin, V.M., and Simak, S.V., Protein polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as a common vole sibling species identification method (Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779 and M. rossiaemeridionalis Ognev, 1924 (Rodentia, Cricetidae)), Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2019, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 353–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out in accordance with a State Assignment of the Federal Research Center Karelian Center, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Petrozavodsk State University, 185910, Petrozavodsk, Russia

    E. V. Ivanter

  2. Karelian Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185000, Petrozavodsk, Russia

    E. V. Ivanter

Authors
  1. E. V. Ivanter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Ivanter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This study was conducted without the use of animals and without involving people as subjects.

Additional information

Translated by M. Shulskaya

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanter, E.V. The Ecology of Sibling Species of the Common Vole (Microtus arvalis Pall. and Microtus rossiaemeridionalis Ognev) at the Northern Limit of Its Range. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 50, 1286–1293 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359023603166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359023603166

Keywords

Search

Navigation