Abstract
Fibrous food passage through the digestive tract of Daurian pika (Ochtona dauurica) was studied by means of multiple dose marking of food by neutral plastic markers. Contrary to expectations, the mean retention time in the gut was less than 6 h (as in small voles with half the body mass). Returns of markers to the stomach were noted, which may be a consequence of coprophagy, as well as retention of markers in the caecum–colon separation system. The residual excretion of markers from the digestive tract is extended to 23 h due to the re-entry of markers into the digestive tract.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1062359022040100/MediaObjects/10525_2022_8764_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1062359022040100/MediaObjects/10525_2022_8764_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1062359022040100/MediaObjects/10525_2022_8764_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Björnhag, G., Separation and delay of contents in the rabbit colon, Swed. J. Agric. Res., 1972, no. 2, pp. 125–136.
Björnhag, G. and Snipes, R.L., Colonic separation mechanism in lagomorph and rodent species—a comparison, Zoosyst. Evol., 1999, vol. 75, pp. 275–281.
Clauss, M., Besselmann, D., Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., and Hatt, J.-M., Demonstrating coprophagy with passage markers? The example of the plains viscacha (Lagostomus maximus), Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A: Mol. Integr. Physiol., 2007, vol. 147, pp. 453–459.
Cranford, J.A. and Johnson, E.O., Effect of coprophagy and diet quality on two microtine rodents (Microtus pensylvanicus and Microtus pinetorum), J. Mammal., 1989, vol. 70, pp. 494–502.
Fu, H. and Li, W., Metagenomic comparisons between soft and hard feces of plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae), Animals, 2022, vol. 12, p. 149.
Haga, R., Observations on the ecology of the Japanese pika, J. Mammal., 1960, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 200–212.
Hagen, K.B., Müller, D.W.H., Ortmann, S., Kreuzerd, M., and Clauss, M., Digesta kinetics in two arvicoline rodents, the field vole (Microtus agrestis) and the lemming (Lagurus lagurus), Mammal. Biol., 2018, vol. 89, pp. 71–78.
Hirakawa, H., Coprophagy in leporids and other mammalian herbivores, Mammal. Rev., 2001, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 61–80.
Hirakawa, H. and Okada, A., Hard faeces reingestion and the passage and recycling of large particles in the diet of the Japanese hare Lepus brachyurus, Mammalia, 1995, vol. 59, pp. 237–247.
Matsuzawa, T., Nakata, M., and Tsushima, M., Feeding and excretion in the Afgan pika (Ochotona rufescens rufescens), a new laboratory animal, Lab. Anim., 1981, no. 15, pp. 319–322.
Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K., and Chistova, T.Yu., Investigation of food advancement along the digestive tract of voles by the method of multiple injections of plastic markers, Zool. Zh., 2007, no. 6, pp. 739–750.
Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K., Chistova, T.Yu., and Formozov, N.A., The structure of the epithelial surface of the gastrointestinal tract of pikas (Ochotona pallasi and O. dauurica, Lagomorpha, Ochotonidae): functional and species specificity, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2014, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 357–363.
Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K., Chistova, T.Yu., Varshavskii, A.A., and Formozov, N.A., Reduction of plant fibers in the digestive tract of two pika species (Ochotona pallasi and O. dauurica, Lagomorpha, Ochotonidae), Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2015, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 124–128.
Pei, Y.-X., Wang, D.-H., and Hume, I.D., Selective digesta retention and coprophagy in Brandt’s vole (Microtus brandti), J. Comp. Physiol., Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2001, vol. 171, pp. 457–464.
Pshennikov, A.E., Borisov, Z.Z., and Vasil’ev, I.S., Coprophagy and its rhythm in the white hare (Lepus timidus) in Central Yakutia, Zool. Zh., 1988, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 1357–1362.
Pshennikov, A.E., Alekseev, V.G., Koryakin, I.I., and Gnutov, D.Yu., Coprophagy in northern pika (Ochotona hyperborea) in Yakutia, Zool. Zh., 1990, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 106–114.
Taylor, E.L., Does the rabbit chew the cud? (Feces produced at night are swallowed and redigested), Nature, 1939, vol. 143, no. 3632, pp. 982–983.
Thacker, E.G. and Brandt, C.S., Coprophagy in the rabbit, J. Nutr., 1955, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 375–385.
Varshavskiy, Al.A., Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K., Chistova, T.Yu., and Varshavskii, An.A., Interrelation between size of body and of digestive tract organs in some Myomorpha: isometry or allometry?, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2017, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 417–424.
Warner, A.C.I., Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds, Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B, 1981, vol. 51, pp. 789–820.
Zharova, G.K., Chistova, T.Yu., and Naumova, E.I., Characteristics of digesta passage through the gastrointestinal tract of the tamarisk gerbil (Meriones tamariscinus), Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2010, vol. 435, pp. 431–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K. & Chistova, T.Y. The Effect of Coprophagy on the Digesta Passage through the Gut of the Daurian Pika Ochotona dauurica (Ochotonidae, Lagomorpha). Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 49, 318–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359022040100
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359022040100