Skip to main content
Log in

viQC: Visual and Intuitive Quality Control for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteome Analysis

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based bottom-up proteomics becomes a method of choice in a broad range of biomedical studies. However, because of the growing complexity of the mass spectrometers employed in these studies, there is an increasing need in robust and rapid quality control over the instrument performance. A variety of quality control tools targeting all aspects of LC–MS instrument operation have been developed recently. These tools are typically loaded heavily with a large number of metrics. Many of these metrics are difficult for interpretation for regular users without extensive instrumentation and/or data processing experience. In this work, we introduced a set of simple and intuitively understandable metrics for assessing the quality of proteomic analysis, including the total experimental time and the number of spectral scans, ion accumulation time and intensity in both MS and MS/MS spectra, charge state distribution for precursor peptide ions, and the number of sequential MS/MS scans, etc. These metrics are implemented as an open-source utility, viQC, freely available at hg.theorchromo.ru/viQC. The developed tool has been tested experimentally using data from three different Orbitrap instruments and demonstrated its capability for assessing the possible flaws in the instrument’s operation and subsequent improving the efficiency of proteomic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aebersold, R. and Mann, M., Nature, 2016, vol. 537, no. 7620, p. 347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meier, F., Geyer, P.E., Virreira Winter, S., et al., Nat. Methods, 2018, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pichler, P., Mazanek, M., Dusberger, F., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2012, vol. 11, p. 5540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, Z., Polzin, K.O., Dasari, S., et al., Anal. Chem., 2012, vol. 84, p. 5845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sweredoski, M.J., Smith, G.T., Kalli, A., et al., J. Biomol. Tech., 2011, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, R.M., Dance, J., Taylor, R.J., et al., Bioinformatics, 2013, vol. 29, no. 22, p. 2948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Avtonomov, D.M., Raskind, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I. et al., J. Proteome Res., 2016, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bittremieux, W., Kelchtermans, P., Valkenborg, D., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2014, vol. 13, p. 3488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bittremieux, W., Willems, H., Kelchtermans, P., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2015, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kovalchik, K.A., Colborne, S., Spencer, S.E., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2018.

  11. Rudnick, P.A., Clauser, K.R., Kilpatrick, L.E., et al., Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2010, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi, H., Liu, C., Yang, H., et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 2018, vol. 36, no. 11, p. 1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levitsky, L.I., Ivanov, M.V., Lobas, A.A., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2018, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 2249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Solovyeva, E.M., Lobas, A.A., Kopylov, A.T., et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2018, vol. 427, p. 59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bittremieux, W., Meysman, P., Martens, L., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2016, vol. 15, p. 1300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tarasova, I.A., Tereshkova, A.V, Lobas, A.A., et al., Oncotarget, 2018, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D., et al., Bioinformatics, 2008, vol. 24, no. 21, p. 2534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Craig, R. and Beavis, R.C., Bioinformatics, 2004, vol. 20, no. 9, p. 1466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ivanov, M.V., Levitsky, L.I., Bubis, J.A., et al., Proteomics, 2018, vol. 19, no. 3, 1800280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eliuk, S. and Makarov, A., Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2015, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ivanov, M.V., Levitsky, L.I., Lobas, A.A., et al., J. Proteome Res., 2014, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to Prof. S.A. Moshkovskii and I.Yu. Ilina for help in sample preparation, and the facilities of United Pushchino Center for Mass Spectrometry (584307) for help with experiments. We also thank Drs. I.A. Tarasova and M.V. Ivanov, as well as Yu.A. Bubis for a fruitful discussion of the test results of the developed software and the proposed metrics for analyzing the quality of the proteomic experiment.

Funding

The software for implementing the viQC algorithm was developed with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-29-13015. The experimental data used in the work were obtained in the framework of the Program for Basic Research of State Academies of Sciences for 2013–2020 (topic no. ААА-А18-118112090111-4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Gorshkov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Zhukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solovyeva, E.M., Lobas, A.A., Surin, A.K. et al. viQC: Visual and Intuitive Quality Control for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteome Analysis. J Anal Chem 74, 1363–1370 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934819140119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934819140119

Keywords:

Navigation