Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Heat Treatment Effect on the Tensile Strength of Mild Steel Welded Joints Using Ultrasonic Testing

  • ACOUSTIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tensile strength of welded joints subjected to thermal stresses degrades with age. Tensile strength is generally assessed using tensile test, which is a destructive technique. This degradation measurement using the nondestructive testing (NDT) method has merit as specimens are intact even after the test. In situ NDT offers another significant advantage that testing of material can be performed without removing the sample from its service. Ultrasonic testing (UT) is a widely used NDT technique for material characterization and flaws detection. Motivated by this, we aim to investigate the tensile strength of mild steel post-weld heat-treated samples through advanced signal processing of the acquired ultrasonic signals through UT of mild steel heat-treated welded specimens. To this end, mild steel welded specimens were prepared for this study using electric arc welding with E6013 electrodes. After welding, specimens were heat-treated at different temperatures and then normalized. Ultrasonic signals were acquired using the pulse-echo technique on different samples, heat-treated at different temperatures, and later ultrasonic signal’s attenuation was measured. The acquired UT signals were then processed using advance signal processing techniques i.e., fast Fourier transform (FFT) and power spectral density (PSD). Measured attenuation of UT signals and discriminatory features computed through the application of signal processing techniques on acquired UT signals then correlated with the specimens’ tensile strength. Analysis of results showed that the tensile strength, FFT power of UT signals, and UT signals’ PSD energy decreases as UT signal attenuation, increases with an increase in heat treatment temperature. Results also revealed that there exists a relationship between FFT signals strength, PSD energy, and UT signals attenuation with respect to heat treatment temperatures. This study will help weld quality inspectors to use in situ UT for predicting the tensile strength of mild steel welded specimens using the relationship established through the proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Hasan, MF, “Analysis of mechanical behavior and microstructural characteristics change of ASTM A-36 steel applying various heat treatment,” Journal of Material Science and Engineering, 2016, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0022.1000227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shuaib-Babata, Y.L., Adewuyi, R.A. and Aweda, J.O., “Effect of treatment processes (TTP) on some of the mechanical properties of welded 0.165% carbon steel,” Journal of Production Engineering, 2017, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 101–111. https://doi.org/10.24867/JPE-2017-01-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Achebo, J. and Omoregie, M., “Application of multi-criteria decision making optimization tool for determining mild steel weld properties and process parameters using TOPSIS,” International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 2015, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150403.12

  4. Manjula, K., Vijayarekha, K. and Venkatraman, B., “Noise reduction in Ultrasonic signals for identification of weld defects: A Review,” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2013, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 4595–4601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Viswanath, A., Rao, B.P.C., Mahadevan, S., Paramewaran, P., Jayakumar, T. and Raj, B., “Non-destructive assessment of tensile properties of cold worked AISI type 304 stainless steel using nonlinear ultrasonic technique,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2011, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katunin, A., Dragan, K. and Dziendzikowski, M., “Damage identification in aircraft Composite Structures: A case study using various Non-destructive testing techniques,” Composite Structures, 2015, vol. 127, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hübschen, G., Altpeter, I., Tschuncky, R. and Herrmann, H.-G., 2016, “Material characterization using Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) methods,” Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials, 2016, pp. 177–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-00661-2

  8. Michaels, J.E., Michaels, T.E. and Mi, B., “An Ultrasonic angle beam method for in situ sizing of fastener hole cracks,” J. of Non-destructive Eval., 2006, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-006-0002-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kechida, A., Drai, R. and Benammar, A., “Image processing and wavelets transform for sizing of weld defects using ultrasonic TOFD images,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 3083. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2932898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krautkrämer, J. and Krautkrämer, H., 1990, “Detection and classification of defects. In: Ultrasonic testing of materials,” Berlin: Springer, 1990, pp. 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8_20

  11. Nadimpalli, V.K., Yang, L. and Nagy, P.B., “In-situ interfacial quality assessment of Ultrasonic additive manufacturing components using ultrasonic NDE,” NDT & E International, 2018, vol. 93, pp. 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherfaoui, M., “Innovative techniques in non-destructive testing and industrial applications on pressure equipment,” Procedia Engineering, 2012, vol. 46, pp. 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan, S.Z., Khan, T.M., Joya, Y.F., Khan, M.A., Ahmed, S. and Shah, A., “Assessment of material properties of AISI 316L stainless steel using Non-destructive testing,” Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2016, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2015.1121265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aghaie-Khafri, M., Honarvar, F. and Zanganeh, S., “Characterization of grain size and yield strength in AISI 301 stainless steel using ultrasonic attenuation measurements,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2012, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-012-0134-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarpüun, I. H., Kılıçkaya, M.S. and Tuncel, S., “Mean grain size determination in marbles by ultrasonic velocity techniques,” NDT & E International, 2005, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raj, B., Moorthy, V., Jayakumar, T. and Rao, K.B.S., “Assessment of microstructures and mechanical behavior of metallic materials through non-destructive characterization,” International Materials Reviews, 2013, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 273–225. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066003225010254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Toozandehjani, M., Matori, K.A., Ostovan, F., Mustapha, F. and Zahari, N.I., “On the correlation between microstructural evolution and ultrasonic properties: A review,” Journal of Materials Science, 2015, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 2643–2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8855-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tariq, F., Naz, N., Baloch, R.A. and Faisal, “Characterization of material properties of 2xxx Series Al-Alloys by Non-destructive testing techniques,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2012, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-011-0117-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwun, S.I., Hong, S.T. and Choo, W.Y., “Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of microstructure and strength of carbon steels,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, 2000, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 1453–1456. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006779607608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chassignole, B., Guerjouma, R. El., Ploix, M.-A. and Fouquet, T., “Ultrasonic and structural characterization of anisotropic austenitic stainless steel welds: Towards a higher reliability in ultrasonic non-destructive testing,” NDT & E International, 2010, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.005

  21. Khan, T.M.R., Maqsood, A., Warraich, S.A. and Khalid, S., “Post weld heat treatment characterization of mild steel (E6013) welded areas using wavelet transform of ultrasonic testing signals,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2018, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 2274–2280. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ali, M.G., Warraich, S.A. and Khan, T.M., Evaluation of the aging effect on Mild Steel (E6013) welded areas using Hilbert Huang Transform on UT Signals: International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), Islamabad, 2016, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2016.7813210

  23. Khalid, A., Ali, M.G., Khan, T.M., Imran, M., Nisar, S., Shah, A. and Shah, A., “Assessment and Characterization of Welded and Heat Treated Mild Steel (E 6013) using in-situ NDT Ultrasonic Testing techniques and Hilbert Huang Transform of Ultrasonic Testing Signals,” Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2021, (in press).

  24. ASTM E8/E8M: Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials.

  25. Avner, S.H., Introduction to Physical Metallurgy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974, pp. 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tabatabaeipour, S.M. and Honarvar, F., “A comparative evaluation of ultrasonic testing of AISI 316L welds made by shielded metal arc welding and gas tungsten arc welding processes,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010, vol. 210, no. 8, pp. 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sonatest, “Safety Data Sheet, Sonagel W,” Revision 5, 2015, https://archive.org/details/SonagelWMSDSEnglish. Accessed March 20, 2019.

  28. Zappa, S., Svoboda, H. & Surian, E., “Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the mechanical properties of supermartensitic stainless steel deposit,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2467-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, NUST, Pakistan

    Abid Shah, Aqueel Shah, Muhammad Imran & Salman Nisar

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, NUST, Pakistan

    Ghazanfar Ali & Tariq Mairaj Rasool Khan

  3. PCSIR Laboratories complex Karachi, PN Engineering College, NUST, Pakistan

    Ghazanfar Ali

Authors
  1. Abid Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ghazanfar Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tariq Mairaj Rasool Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aqueel Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Imran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Salman Nisar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Abid Shah or Ghazanfar Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abid Shah, Ali, G., Khan, T.M. et al. Evaluation of Heat Treatment Effect on the Tensile Strength of Mild Steel Welded Joints Using Ultrasonic Testing. Russ J Nondestruct Test 57, 455–464 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921060024

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921060024

Keywords:

Search

Navigation