Abstract
Coordinate distributions U(x) were calculated for the electric voltage across a magnetic field sensor scanning a magnetic carrier with recordings of pulsed magnetic fields from a linear inductor moved discretely with a given pitch above the magnetic carrier surface. The magnetic carrier was acted upon with pulses of one direction and with oppositely directed pulses. The characteristics of the magnetic field sensors used in experimental studies were expressed as analytical arctangent functions. An arctangent initial curve and hysteresis branches of the dependence of electric voltage U(H) across the magnetic field sensor on magnetic field strength when the sensor scans a magnetic carrier are presented. These curves correspond to the distribution of remanent magnetization in the magnetic carrier in a pulsed magnetic field. The sensitivity of the magnetic field sensors used in the calculations was \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{max}}1}}} = \) 1.0 mV cm/A, \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{max}}2}}} = \) 0.26 mV cm/A, \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{max}}3}}} = \) 2.8 mV cm/A. Sequences are established in which the remanent magnetization changes in the magnetic carrier exposed to unipolar and bipolar magnetic-field pulses. Hysteretic interference is represented as the interference of the distributions of the electric voltage across the sensor in a pulsed magnetic field U(x) along the coordinate x. The results of calculations of the magnitude of electric voltage U across the sensor are presented for layers of aluminum foil with a thickness on the order of 0.05 mm by hysteretic and anhysteretic methods. It is shown that the use of hysteretic interference can increase threefold or more the sensitivity of measuring instruments.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Nondestructive control of objects made of electroconductive materials in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 810–818.
Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Using magnetic hysteresis for testing electroconductive objects in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2013, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 334–346.
Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S., and Pivovarov, V.L., Calculation of residual magnetic-field distributions upon hysteretic interference of a pulsed magnetic field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 8–16.
Pavlyuchenko V.V., Doroshevich E.S., and Pivovarov, V.L., Calculating distributions of pulsed magnetic fields under hysteretic interference, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 121–127.
Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Using film flux detectors to determine properties of conducting and magnetic objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 70–76.
Sukhanov, D.Ya. and Zav’yalova, K.V., Representing the field of an electrically conductive object as the superposition of fields of elementary eddy currents and their tomography, Izv. VUZov, 2017, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 28—34.
Atavin, V.G., Uzkikh, A.A., and Iskhuzhin, R.R., Tuning out from base electric conductivity in conductive-coating thickness gauging, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 77–83.
Zhdanov, A.G., Shchukis, E.G., Lunin, V.P., and Stolyarov, A.A., Algorithms for pre-processing of eddy-current signals when inspecting heat-exchanger pipes of NPP steam generators, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 283–293.
Kiselev, E.K. and Gol’dstein, A.E., Eddy-current system for testing inner diameter of pipes, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 210–216.
Lukhvich, A.A., Bulatov, O.V., Luk’yanov, A.L., Polyakova, M.N., and Mosyakin, V.V., Magnetodynamic testing of the thickness of nickel coatings applied under chromium coatings on two-layer (nonferromagnet-ferromagnet) bases, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
Kozlov, V.S., Tekhnika magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing Technique), Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkola, 1976.
Gruzintsev, A.A. and Mikhailov, S.P., Self-consisted calculation of the magnetic field for problems of magnetic flaw detection. I. Initial model for calculating the field of a magnetic tape magnetized from a wire with a current, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2011, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 104–111.
Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Testing for discontinuities in metals using film flux detectors, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 48–58.
Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Detecting extended complex-shaped defects in electroconductive plates using a magnetic carrier, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 217–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by V. Potapchouck
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S. Hysteretic Interference of Magnetic Field of a Moving Linear Inductor. Russ J Nondestruct Test 56, 49–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920010106
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920010106