Abstract
Methods have been developed in ultrasonic flaw detection for recording and analyzing echo signals with the aim to determine the type of a reflector and its dimensions. The TOFD method allows one to distinguish between a crack and a volume reflector based on the phase of echo signals and highly accurately determine the crack height. However, it can be difficult to isolate a useful signal if it is against a noisy background. In addition, in the TOFD, it is impossible to determine reflector’s offset from the center of a welded joint without scanning across the weld. The method of digital focusing with an antenna (DFA) allows producing high-quality images over the entire volume of the welded joint, but only the amplitude of the DFA image is commonly analyzed without taking its phase into account. In this paper, we utilize the strengths of these two methods in analyzing the image of reflectors; this makes it possible to more accurately determine reflector type and coordinates in the presence of noise. Numerical and model experiments have confirmed the efficiency of the approach proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Voronkov, V.A., Voronkov, I.V., Kozlov, V.N., Samokrutov, A.A., and Shevaldykin, V.G., On the applicability of antenna array technology in ultrasonic testing of hazardous production facilities, V mire NK, 2011, no. 1 (51), pp. 64–70.
Bazulin, E.G., Determination of the reflector type from an image reconstructed using echo signals measured with ultrasonic antenna arrays, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2014, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 141–149.
Bazulin, E.G., Two approaches to the solution of problems of ultrasonic flaw metering: Analysis of a high-quality image of reflectors and correlation analysis of measured echo signals, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 60–77.
Silk, M.G. and Lidington, B.H., The potential of scattered or diffracted ultrasound in the determination of crack depth, Nondestr. Test., 1975, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 146—151.
Doctor, S.R., Hall, T.E., and Reid, L.D., SAFT—the evolution of a signal processing technology for ultrasonic testing, NDT Int., 1986, vol. 19, pp. 163–167.
Golubev, A.S., Reflection of plane waves from a cylindrical defect, Akust. Zh., 1961, vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 174–180.
Pao, Y.H. and Mow, C.C., Diffraction of Elastic Waves and Dynamic Stress Concentrations, New York: Crane Russak, 1973.
Achenbach, J.D., Gautesen, A.K., and McMaken, H., Ray Methods for Waves in Elastic Solids: with Applications to Scattering, Boston-London-Melbourne: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., 1982.
Zernov, V., Fradkin, L.J., and Darmon, M., A refinement of the Kirchhoff approximation to the scattered elastic fields, Ultrasonics, 2012, no. 7, pp. 830–835.
Kanevskii, I.N., Fokusirovanie zvukovykh i ul’trazvukovykh voln (Focusing Sound and Ultrasound Waves), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.
Bazulin, E.G., Vopilkin, A.Kh., and Tikhonov, D.S., Improving the reliability of ultrasonic testing. Part 1. Determination of the type of discontinuity in ultrasonic testing with antenna arrays, Kontrol’ Diagn., 2015, no. 8, pp. 7–21.
Official website of EXTENDE company. http://www.extende.com/. Cited December 4, 2018.
Bazulin, E.G., The use of the inverse C-SAFT method for equalizing the spatial sensitivity of reflector images, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 108–119.
Official website of EKHO+ company. http://www.echoplus.ru. Accessed December 4, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by V. Potapchouck
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bazulin, E.G., Vopilkin, A.K., Sukhorukov, N.I. et al. Analyzing the Phase of DFA Image for Determining the Type of Detected Reflector. Russ J Nondestruct Test 55, 507–516 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830919070039
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830919070039