Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetometry data processing to detect archaeological sites

  • Applied Problems
  • Published:
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article presents the algorithm that allows one to carry out automatic detection of local anomalies of magnetometric data based on image analysis principles. The algorithm was tested on the available data of the magnetometric survey in areas of planned archaeological excavations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. N. Smekalova, F. N. Lisetskii, O. A. Marinina, A. V. Chudin, and A. S. Garipov, “Spatial organization of ancient land tenure in the Northwestern Crimea by means of geoarcheological methods,” Vestn. Arkheol., Antropol. Etnogr., No. 1(28), 150–160 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. N. Smekalova, B. W. Bevan, A. V. Chudin, and A. S. Garipov, “The discovery of an ancient Greek vineyard, Archeol. Prosp. 23 (1), 15–26 (2015). doi doi 10.1002/arp.1517

  3. T. N. Smekalova, E. B. Yathishina, F. N. Lisetskii, A. V. Chudin, A. S. Garipov, A. E. Ppasumanskii, and R. S. Ketsko, “High technologies in archaeology on the example of Crimea,” in Bosporus Researches (Kerch, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Duda and P. Hart, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (John Wiley and Sons, 1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. I. W. Selesnick and C. S. Burrus, “Generalized digital Butterworth filter design,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 46 (6), 1688–1694 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jian-Lei Liu and Da-Zheng Feng, “Two-dimensional multi-pixel anisotropic Gaussian filter for edge-line segment (ELS) detection,” Image Vision Comput. 32 (1), 37–53 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. E. Kalman, “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,” J. Basic Eng. 82 (1), 35–45 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. S. Prewitt, “Object enhancement and extraction,” in Picture Processing and Psychopictorics (Acad. Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Scharr, Optimale Operatoren in der Digitalen Bildverarbeitung (1970). http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg. de/volltextserver/962/

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. K. Khmelevskoi, Geophysical Methods for Investigating the Earth Crust (Dubna Univ., Dubna, 1999), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. P. Dudkin and I. N. Koshelev, “Method for complex interpreting the results of magnetometric survey of archaeological landmarks,” Vostochnoevropeisk. Arkheol. Zh., No. 3(6) (2002). http://archaeology. kiev.ua/ journal/030502/dudkin_koshelev.htm

  12. A. B. Kazhdan and O. I. Gus’kov, Digital Image Processing (Tekhnosfera, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. K. Malovichko, Methods for Analytical Continuation of Gravity Anomaly and Their Application to Gravy-Survey Problems (Tekhnika, Moscow, 1956) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Nikitin and A. V. Petrov, Theoretical Foundations for Processing the Geophysical Information (Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Mathematical Methods in Geology (Nedra, Moscow, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Mikhailova.

Additional information

Natal’ya Genrikhovna Grafeeva. Born 1953. Graduated from the Saint Petersburg State University in 1976 (Mathematics and Mechanics, specialization Mathematics). Graduated from the post-graduate studies in 1979, and passed Ph.D. defense in 1980. Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Information and Analytical Systems, St. Petersburg State University. Lecturer of the St. Petersburg State University; Professor since 1981. Scientific interests: databases, data mining.

Elena Georgievna Mikhailova. Born 1970. Ph.D. (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor of the Department of Information and Analytical Systems, Saint Petersburg State University, acting head of the department. Scientific Secretary of the Academic Council of the Department of Mathematics and Mechanics. Lecturer of the St. Petersburg State University since 1997.

Vasilisa Sergeevna Mikhailova. Born 1994. Graduated from the St. Petersburg State University in 2015. Defended a bachelor’s thesis in 2015. Currently, a junior engineer in OOO “OpenWay Service.” Scientific interests: image processing and data mining.

Andrei Viktorovich Chudin. Graduate of the Department of Quantum Magnetic phenomena, St. Petersburg State University. Research Engineer of the Department of Physics, SPSU from January 2, 2015, to December 31, 2015. Scientific interests: magnetic survey, remote sensing in archeology, nondestructive methods of archaeological artifacts spectroscopy, physical and chemical methods, natural science interdisciplinary methods, ancient ceramic production technology, magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikhailova, V.S., Grafeeva, N.G., Mikhailova, E.G. et al. Magnetometry data processing to detect archaeological sites. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 26, 789–799 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661816040106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661816040106

Keywords

Navigation