Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crack Tip Opening Angle as a Fracture Resistance Parameter to Describe Ductile Crack Extension and Arrest in Steel Pipes under Service Pressure

  • Published:
Physical Mesomechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The angle between two element sides representing the crack tip is defined as the crack tip opening angle (CTOA). Its critical value is used as a criterion of fracture resistance for characterizing stable tearing in thin metallic materials. Various methods are used for determination of the CTOA. Optical microscopy is one of the most common methods as well as fitting of experimental load-displacement diagrams by the finite element method (DIC). Additionally, analytical analysis using the experimental load-displacement curve method (SSM) derived from the plastic hinge model of deflection in three-point bending of a ductile specimen is applied. This approach assumes a constant rotation centre distance. Values of CTOA for API 5L X65 pipe steel found by three methods—DIC, CNM, and SSM—are given. Values of CTOA given by these three methods are similar and close to 20°. A discussion on the different parameters used to characterize the fracture resistance of running cracks in a pipe under service pressure is presented. The energy of fracture at impact determined by Charpy or drop-weight tear test (DWTT) tests and the critical J energy parameter are considered as well as the yield locus after damage, cohesive zone energy, and CTOA is another approach. One notes that CTOA is assumed to be constant during stable crack extension and decreases linearly with crack length during the instable and primary phase. A numerical technique to describe a ductile running crack using the node release technique and using CTOA as the fracture resistance criterion is presented. This method is compared with three different two-curve methods (TCMs): the Battelle, high strength line pipe (HLP), and HLP-Sumitomo methods. The Batelle TCM, as the oldest method, based on Charpy energy, gives a strongly conservative prediction. Predictions by the CTOA method are close to those obtained by the HLP-Sumitomo one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, H., A Finite Element Representation of Stable Crack Growth, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1973, vol. 21, pp. 337–356.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rice, J.R. and Sorensen, E.P., Continuing Crack Tip Deformation and Fracture for Plane-Strain Crack Growth in Elastic-Plastic Solids, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1978, vol. 26, pp. 163–186.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Shih, C.F., de Lorenzi, H.G., and Andrews, W.R., Studies on Crack Initiation and Stable Crack Growth, ASTM STP, 1979, vol. 668, pp. 65–120.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kanninen, M.F., Rybicki, E.F., Stonesifer, R.B., Broek, D., Rosenfield, A.R., and Nalin, G.T., Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics for Two Dimensional Stable Crack Growth and Instability Problems, ASTM STP, 1979, vol. 668, pp. 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newman, J.C., Jr., An Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Crack Initiation, Stable Crack Growth, and Instability, ASTM STP, 1984, vol. 833, pp. 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brocks, W. and Yuan, H., Numerical Studies on Stable Crack Growth, in Defect Assessment in Components Fundamentals and Applications, vol. 9, London: ESIS Publication, 1991, pp. 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luxmoore, A., Light, M.F., and Evans, W.T., A Comparison of Energy Release Rates, the J-Integral and Crack Tip Displacements, Int. J. Fract., 1977, vol. 13, pp. 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Koning, A.U., A Contribution to the Analysis of Slow Stable Crack Growth, in National Aerospace Laboratory Report NLR MP75035U, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reuter, W.G., Graham, S.M., Lloyd, W.R., and Williamson, R.L., Ability of Using Experimental Measurements of CTOD to Predict Crack Initiation for Structural Components, in Defect Assessment in Components Fundamentals and Applications, vol. 9, London: ESIS Publication, 1991, pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawicke, D.S. and Sutton, M.A., CTOA and Crack Tunneling Measurements in Thin Sheet 2024-T3 Aluminum Alloy, Exp. Mech, 1994, vol. 34(4), pp. 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM E2472-06e1. Standard Test Method for Determination of Resistance to Stable Crack Extension under Low-Constraint Conditions, 2002.

  12. Zerbst, U., Heinimann, M., Donne, C.D., and Steglich, D., Fracture and Damage Mechanics Modeling of Thin-Walled Structures—An Overview, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2009, vol. 76, pp. 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxey, W.A., Fracture Initiation, Propagation and Arrest, in Proc. 5th Symp. on Line Pipe Research. PRCI Catalog No. L30174, 1974, pp. J1–J31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sugie, E., Matsuoka, M., Akiyama, H., Mimura, T., and Kawaguchi, Y., A Study of Shear Crack Propagation in Gas-Pressurized Pipelines, J. Press. Vess. Technol, 1982, vol. 104(4), pp. 338–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demofonti, G., Buzzichelli, G., Venzi, S., and Kanninen, M., Step by Step Procedure for the Two Specimen CTOA Test, in Pipeline Technology, vol. II, Denys, R., Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995, pp. 503–512.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Demofonti, G., Mannucci, G., Hillenbrand, H.G., Harris, D., Evaluation of X100 Steel Pipes for High Pressure Gas Transportation Pipelines by Full Scale Tests, Int. Pipeline Conf., Calgary, Canada, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd, W.R., Microtopography for Ductile Fracture Process Characterization, Part 1: Theory and Methodology, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2003, vol. 70, pp. 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman, J.C., James, M.A., and Zerbst, U., A Review of the CTOA/CTOD Fracture Criterion, Eng. Fract. Mech, 2003, vol. 70, pp. 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heeerens, J. and Schodel, M., On the Determination of Crack Tip Opening Angle, CTOA, Using Light Microscopy and 8S Measuring Technique, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2003, vol. 70, pp. 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, S., Bouchard, R., and Tyson, W.R., Simplified Single-Specimen Method for Evaluating CTOA, Eng. Fract. Mech, 2007, vol. 74, pp. 2459–2464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinelli, A. and Venzi, S., Tearing Modulus, J-Integral, CTOA and Crack Profile Shape Obtained from the Load-Displacement Curve Only, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1996, vol. 53, pp. 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang, J., Zhang, J., and Wang, L., Evaluation of Cracking Behavior and Critical CTOA Values of Pipeline Steel from DWTT Specimens, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2014, vol. 124/125, pp. 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Donoghue, P.E., Kanninen, M.F., Leung, C.P., Demofonti, G., and Venzi, S., The Development and Validation of a Dynamic Fracture Propagation Model for Gas Transmission Pipelines, Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 1997, vol. 70, pp. 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Darcis, Ph.P., McCowan, C.N., Windhoff, H., McColskey, J.D., and Siewert, T.A., Crack Tip Opening Angle Optical Measurement Methods in Five Pipeline Steels, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2008, vol. 75, pp. 2453–2468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amaro, R.L., Sowards, J.W., Drexler, E.S., McColskey, J.D., and MacCowan, C., CTOA Testing of Pipe Line Steels Using MDCB Specimens, J. Pipe Eng., 2013, vol. 3, pp. 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Higuchi, R., Makino, H., and Takeuchi, I., New Concept and Test Method on Running Ductile Fracture Arrest for High Pressure Gas Pipeline, 24th World Gas Conf., WGC 2009, Vol. 4, International Gas Union, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2009, pp. 2730–2737.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tronskar, J.P., Mannan, M.A., and Lai, M.O., Measurement of Fracture Initiation Toughness and Crack Resistance in Instrumented Charpy Impact Testing, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2002, vol. 69, pp. 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaouadi, R. and Puzzolante, J.L., Loading Tate Effect on Ductile Crack Resistance of Steels Using Precracked Charpy Specimens, Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2008, vol. 85, pp. 752–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cen, Ch., Characterization and Calculation of Fracture Toughness for High Grade Pipes: Thesis, University of Alberta, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scheider, I., Nonn, A., Volling, A., Mondry, A., and Kalwa, C., A Damage Mechanics Based Evaluation of Dynamic Fracture Resistance in Gas Pipelines, Proc. Mater. Sci., 2014, vol. 3, pp. 1956–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gullerud, A.S., Dodds, R.H., Hampton, R.W., Dawicke, D.S., Three-Dimensional Modeling of Ductile Crack Growth in Thin Sheet Metals: Computational Aspects and Validation, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1999, vol. 63(4), pp. 347–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hampton, R.W. and Nelson, D., Stable Crack Growth and Instability Prediction in Thin Plates and Cylinders, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2003, vol. 70(3/4), pp. 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maxey, W., Dynamic Crack Propagation in Line Pipe, Analytical and Experimental Fracture Mechanics, Sih, G.C. and Mirabile, M., Eds., 1981, pp. 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nordhagen, H.O., Kragset, S., Berstad, T., Morin, A., Dörumb, C., and Munkejord, S.T., A New Coupled Fluid-Structure Modelling Methodology for Running Ductile Fracture, Comput. Struct., 2012, vol. 94/95, pp. 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ben Amara, M., Pluvinage, G., Capelle, J., and Azari, Z., Prediction of Arrest Pressure in Pipe Based on CTOA, J. Pipe Eng. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Mécanique Biomécanique Polymère Structures, École Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Metz, Metz, 57078, France

    M. Ben Amara, J. Capelle & Z. Azari

  2. Fiabilité Mécanique Conseils, Silly sur Nied, 57530, France

    G. Pluvinage

Authors
  1. M. Ben Amara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Pluvinage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Capelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Z. Azari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Pluvinage.

Additional information

Original Text © M. Ben Amara, G. Pluvinage, J. Capelle, Z. Azari, 2015, published in Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika, 2015, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 80-93.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Amara, M., Pluvinage, G., Capelle, J. et al. Crack Tip Opening Angle as a Fracture Resistance Parameter to Describe Ductile Crack Extension and Arrest in Steel Pipes under Service Pressure. Phys Mesomech 18, 355–369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959915040086

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959915040086

Keywords

Search

Navigation