Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of Weakening the Dynamic Barrier of the Arctic Polar Vortex

  • ATMOSPHERIC AND HYDROSPHERIC PHYSICS
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic barrier is one of the physical characteristics of the polar vortices; it prevents subpolar air masses from penetrating into the vortex and contributes to a temperature decrease inside the vortex in the lower stratosphere. In the presence of a dynamic barrier in winter, chlorine cycle reagents of ozone destruction accumulate on particles of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and heterogeneous reactions occur with the formation of molecular chlorine. Solar radiation over the polar region trigger photochemical reactions that lead to large-scale ozone depletion. When the dynamic barrier weakens in winter, the temperature inside the vortex rises, PSC particles are destroyed, and, thus, the accumulation of chlorine cycle reagents on PSCs is interrupted. The dynamics of the Arctic polar vortex is proposed to be divided into three types according to the character of consequences: (1) a strong vortex, the activity of which results in the formation of an ozone anomaly, (2) a weak vortex with breakdown in winter, marked by a sudden stratospheric warming, and (3) a stable vortex with an episode (episodes) of weakening of the dynamic barrier in winter without ozone depletion in the period from late winter to spring. A characteristic of the dynamic barrier of the polar vortex at all pressure levels from 100 to 1 hPa is presented for the first time and the consequences of its weakening are described. Using the vortex delineation method based on the data of the ERA5 and MERRA-2 re-analyses, it is shown that in all cases when the polar ozone anomaly was not recorded from late winter to spring under the conditions of the stable polar vortex, the dynamic barrier weakened and particles in the PSСs were destroyed in midwinter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. W. Waugh, A. H. Sobel, and L. M. Polvani, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98 (1), 37–44 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. L. Manney, R. W. Zurek, A. O’Neill, and R. Swinbank, J. Atmos. Sci. 51 (20), 2973–2994 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Zuev and E. Savelieva, Polar Sci. 25, 100532 (2020).

  4. S. Solomon, Rev. Geophys. 37 (3), 275–316 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. J. Finlayson-Pitts and J. N. Pitts, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications (Acad. Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Hersbach, B. Bell, P. Berrisford, et al., Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146 (729), 1–51 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Gelaro, W. McCarty, M. J. Suárez, et al., J. Clim. 30 (14), 5419–5454 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Zuev and E. Savelieva, J. Earth Syst. Sci. 132 (1), 39 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Limpasuvan, D. W. J. Thompson, and D. L. Hartmann, J. Clim. 17 (13), 2584–2596 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Hoppel, R. Bevilacqua, G. Nedoluha, et al., J. Geophys. Res. 107 (20), 8262 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kuttippurath and G. Nikulin, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (17), 8115–8129 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Zuev and E. Savelieva, Pure Appl. Geophys. 179 (6–7), 2609–2616 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Holton, An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, 4th ed. (Acad. Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 23-17-00273, https://rscf.ru/project/23-17-00273/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Zuev.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuev, V.V., Savelieva, E.S., Maslennikova, E.A. et al. Consequences of Weakening the Dynamic Barrier of the Arctic Polar Vortex. Dokl. Earth Sc. 514, 401–409 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23602924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23602924

Keywords:

Navigation