Skip to main content
Log in

To a Question of Sulfur Sites in Crystal Structures of Tetrahedrite Group Minerals: Relationships between Occupancy, Effective Ion Sizes, and Unit Cell Parameters

  • MINERALOGY
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a crystal chemical analysis of the known experimentally deciphered crystal structures of tetrahedrite group minerals was carried out in order to reveal the relationships between the occupancies of anion crystallographic sites in the structures, their effective sizes and unit cell parameters. To achieve this aim, we analyzed the effective sizes of the 24g and 2a anion sites in 68 deciphered crystal structures of tetrahedrite group minerals according to the published data. The analysis was carried out using the TOPOSPro software package by partitioning the space into Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra (VDP). It has been shown theoretically for the first time that the content of a large sulfur ion and its deficiency affect the unit cell parameter. A linear correlation between the VDP volume of the anionic site of S2– (24g) and the unit cell parameter in minerals of the tetrahedrite group was established, which shows that the anionic substructure dictates the structural motif in this class of compounds. It was found that the change in the VDP volumes of sulfur anions is associated with different occupancies of anionic sites. It is found that the formula (unit cell) of the compound contains fewer than 13 sulfur ions in almost all deciphered crystal structures of tetrahedrite group minerals. It was concluded that the calculated VDP volume of the 24g anionic position less than 22 Å3 indicates a significant deficit in the anionic substructure. It was shown that, using information about the VDP volumes of all anionic and cationic sites in the structure, it is possible to predict the unit cell parameters of minerals of the tetrahedrite group with an accuracy of 0.01 Å.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the data of Mozgovaya and Tsepin [2], the inflection in the dependence of parameter a0 on the Ag content is when the Ag content = 3.7 Ag atoms in the formula.

  2. a0 (Å) = 10.319 – 0.059KAs + 0.075(ΣMe:S) [6], where Ki are formula coefficients of the respective elements, the ΣMe:S ratio is the nonstoichiometry measure. a0 (Å) = 10.319 + 0.017KFe + 0.027(ΣMe:S) [4]; a0 (Å) = 10.319 + 0.031KFe + 0.028KZn + 0.096KHg + 0.007(ΣMe:S) – 0.040KAs + “Ag” [2], where “Ag” = KAg/(21.9-1.01KAg), when the Ag content is <3.7 atoms in the formula and “Ag” = 1/(1.66KAg – 1.28) when the Ag concentration is >3.7 atoms in the formula.

REFERENCES

  1. C. Biagioni, L. L. George, N. J. Cook, E. Makovicky, Y. Moëlo, M. Pasero, J. Sejkora, C. J. Stanley, M. D. Welch, and F. Bosi, Am. Mineral. 105 (1), 109–122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2020-7128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. N. Mozgova and A. I. Tsepin, Fahlores: Features of Chemical Composition and Properties (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. G. Lyubimtseva, N. S. Bortnikov, S. E. Borisovsky, V. Yu. Prokofiev, and O. V. Vikent’eva, Geol. Ore Deposits 60 (2), 93–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701518020034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Tatsuka and N. Morimoto, Am. Mineral. 62 (11-12), 1101–1109 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. S. Bortnikov and I. Ya. Nekrasov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 297 (2), 449–451 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. D. Luce, C. L. Tuttle, and B. J. Skinner, Econ. Geol. 72 (2), 271–289 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.72.2.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. V. Belov and E. A. Pobedimskaya, Mineral. Sb. L’vov. Gos. Univ. im. I. Franko, Iss. 1 (27), 3–9 (1973).

  8. M. D. Welch, C. J. Stanley, J. Spratt, and S. J. Mills, Eur. J. Mineral. 30 (6), 1163–1172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2018/0030-2773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Biagioni, J. Sejkora, Y. Moëlo, E. Makovicky, M. Pasero, and Z. Dolniček, Mineral. Mag. 84, 971−975 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2020.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Qu, X. Sima, X. Gu, W. Sun, G. Fan, Z. Hou, P. Ni, D. Wang, Z. Yang, and Y. Wang, Mineral. Mag. 85, 278−281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2021.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Shu, C. Shen, A. Lu, and X. Gu, Crystals 12 (4), 467 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. O. Sack, N. G. Lyubimtseva, N. S. Bortnikov, E. Y. Anikina, and S. E. Borisovsky, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 177 (8), 82 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-022-01942-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I. V. Rozhdestvenskaya, N. V. Zayakina, and V. P. Samusikov, Mineral. Zh. 15, 9 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. A. Blatov, A. P. Shevchenko, and D. M. Proserpio, Cryst. Growth Des. Am. Chem. Soc. 14 (7), 3576–3586 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cg500498k

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out under project no. 121041500220-0 “Structural and Chemical Inhomogeneities and Paragenetic Mineral Associations as a Reflection of the Petro- and Ore Genesis” of the Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. G. Lyubimtseva.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lyubimtseva, N.G., Marchenko, E.I., Eremin, N.N. et al. To a Question of Sulfur Sites in Crystal Structures of Tetrahedrite Group Minerals: Relationships between Occupancy, Effective Ion Sizes, and Unit Cell Parameters. Dokl. Earth Sc. 512, 824–828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23601189

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23601189

Keywords:

Navigation