Skip to main content
Log in

The role of spatial heterogeneity of the environment in soil fauna recovery after fires

  • Geography
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest fires are almost always heterogeneous, leaving less-disturbed sites that are potentially suitable as habitats for soil-dwelling creatures. The recovery of large soil animal communities after fires is therefore dependent on the spatial structure of the burned habitats. The role of locally less disturbed sites in the survival of soil macrofauna communities along with traditionally considered immigration from the surrounding undisturbed habitats is shown by the example of burnt areas located in three geographically distant regions of European Russia. Such unburned soil cover sites (perfugia) occupy 5–10% of the total burned habitats. Initially, perfugia are characterized by much higher (200–300% of the average across a burned area) diversity and abundance of soil fauna. A geostatistical method made it possible to estimate the perfugia size for soil macrofauna at 3–8 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. N. Bezkorovainaya, E. N. Krasnoshchekova, and G. A. Ivanova, Biol. Bull. (Moscow) 34 (5), 517–522 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. S. Gilyarov, Zoological Method for Soil Diagnostics (Nauka, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. B. Gongalsky, Zh. Obshch. Biol. 67 (2), 127–138 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. B. Gongalsky, Arid. Ecosyst. 1 (4), 260–266 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Krivolutskii, Soil Fauna in Ecological Monitoring (Nauka, Moscow, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. P. Naumov, Uch. Zap. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Zool., No. 13, 3–38 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. D. Pokarzhevskii, K. B. Gongalsky, A. S. Zaitsev, and F. A. Savin, Spatial Ecology of Soil Animals (KMK, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bengtsson, Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38, 119–125 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. L. Berthet, J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 443–449 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. F. Conrad, SADIEShell. Ver. 1.22 (Rothamsted Institute of Arable Crops Research, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. H. Ettema and D. A. Wardle, Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 177–183 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Gimeno-Garcia, V. Andreu, and J. L. Rubio, Geoderma 118, 17–38 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Hanski, Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 131–135 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. N. Perry and P. M. Dixon, Écoscience 9, 133–141 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Rull, J. Biogeogr. 36, 481–484 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. B. Gongalsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.B. Gongalsky, A.S. Zaitsev, 2016, published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2016, Vol. 471, No. 4, pp. 479–482.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gongalsky, K.B., Zaitsev, A.S. The role of spatial heterogeneity of the environment in soil fauna recovery after fires. Dokl. Earth Sc. 471, 1265–1268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X16120035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X16120035

Navigation