Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the Initial Interface Configuration for In-Situ Neutron Reflectometry Experiments

  • Published:
Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibilities of optimizing the initial structure of the solid-liquid interface for in-situ neutron reflectometry experiments to maximize slight changes in the reflectometry curves associated with small changes in the interface configuration are considered. The interface was modeled as a base layer on a substrate which is in contact with a solution. An adsorption layer (with a thickness of up to 2000 Å) is deposited on this layer from the solution. The proposed optimization procedure was tested for the initial configuration of an electrochemical interface: when the electrical circuit is closed, an adsorption solid-electrolyte interphase is deposited onto a metal electrode on a silicon substrate from a liquid electrolyte with lithium ions. The study of this specific system allows the introduction of restrictions on the variation in the interface parameters, which significantly simplifies solving the optimization problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. Penfold, R. K. Thomas, and H.-H. Shen, Soft Matter 8, 578 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Penfold and R. K. Thomas, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci 19, 198 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. K. Thomas and J. Penfold, Langmuir 31, 7440 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Penfold and R. K. Thomas, Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. C 106, 14 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Fragneto, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 213, 327 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Junghans, E. B. Watkins, R. D. Barker, et al., Biointerphases 10, 019014 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Lauw, T. Rodopoulos, M. Gross, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 074101 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Owejan, J. P. Owejan, S. C. De Caluwe, and J. A. Dura, Chem. Mater. 24, 2133 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. V. Avdeev, A. A. Rulev, V. I. Bodnarchuk, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 424, 378 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Petrenko, Ye. N. Kosiachkin, L. A. Bulavin, and M. V. Avdeev, J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 12 (4), 651 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Lopatin, in Stochastic Optimization in Information Science (St. Petersburg Univ., St. Petersburg, 2005) Vol. 1, p. 133 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. I. Petrenko, I. V. Gapon, A. A. Rulev, et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 994, 012006 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 17-12-01540).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Petrenko.

Additional information

Translated by E. Smirnova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrenko, V.I., Kosiachkin, Y.N., Bulavin, L.A. et al. Optimization of the Initial Interface Configuration for In-Situ Neutron Reflectometry Experiments. J. Surf. Investig. 14, 215–219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020020329

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020020329

Keywords:

Navigation