Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical Composition and Toxicity of Siberian Biomass Burning in the Large Aerosol Chamber (Tomsk)

  • OPTICS OF CLUSTERS, AEROSOLS, AND HYDROSOLES
  • Published:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physicochemical and toxicological properties of biomass burning are of great importance for the assessment of the impacts of wildfires on the environment. However, the data on Siberian wildfires are limited. The composition of aerosols originating during Siberian biomass burning is studied in the Large Aerosol Chamber (LAC) of the Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk. In this work, we study the composition of organic compounds in Siberian pine and forest debris smoke produced during smoldering and flaming phases and aging with the use of FTIR spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography. Markers which allow identifying the combustion conditions and biomass type are suggested, namely, characteristic absorption bands, ratios of carboxyl and aliphatic functionalities, and diagnostic ratios of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Emission factors and carcinogenic risk of smoke PAHs are estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. O. Tomshin and V. Solovyev, “Spatio-temporal patterns of wildfires in Siberia during 2001-2020,” Geocarto Int., 1–19 (2021).

  2. D. Lavoue, C. Liousse, H. Cachier, B. J. Stocks, and J. G. Goldammer, “Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 105 (D22), 26871–26890 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. G. Conard and G. A. Ivanova, “Wildfire in Russian boreal forests—potential impacts of fire regime characteristics on emissions and global carbon balance estimates,” Environ. Pollut. 98 (3), 305–313 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Agarwal, S. G. Aggarwal, K. Okuzawa, and K. Kawamura, “Size distributions of dicarboxylic acids, ketoacids, α-dicarbonyls, sugars, WSOC, OC, EC and inorganic ions in atmospheric particles over northern Japan: Implication for long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning and East Asian polluted aerosols,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (13), 5839–5858 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. M. Russell, R. Bahadur, and P. J. Ziemann, “identifying organic aerosol sources by comparing functional group composition in chamber and atmospheric particles,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 (9), 3516–3521 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. O. B. Popovicheva, E. D. Kireeva, N. K. Shonija, M. Vojtisek-Lom, and J. Schwarz, “FTIR analysis of surface functionalities on particulate matter produced by off-road diesel engines operating on diesel and biofuel,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (6), 4534–4544 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Popovicheva, A. Ivanov, and M. Vojtisek, “Functional factors of biomass burning contribution to spring aerosol composition in a megacity: Combined FTIR-PCA analyses,” Atmosphere 11 (4), 319–339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040319

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Lammers, G. Arbuckle-Keil, and J. Dighton, “FT-I--R study of the changes in carbohydrate chemistry of three New Jersey pine barrens leaf litters during simulated control burning,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 41 (2), 340–347 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Iinuma, E. Bruggemann, T. Gnauk, K. Muller, M. O. Andreae, G. Helas, R. Parmar, and H. Herrmann, “Source characterization of biomass burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 112 (D08209) (2007).

  10. S. Takahama, R. E. Schwartz, L. M. Russell, A. M. Macdonald, S. Sharma, and W. R. Leaitch, “Organic functional groups in aerosol particles from burning and non-burning forest emissions at a high-elevation mountain site,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (13), 6367–6386 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. B. Popovicheva, M. Kistler, E. D. Kireevaa, N. M. Persiantseva, M. A. Timofeeva, N. K. Shoniyac, and V. M. Kopeikin, “Aerosol composition and microstructure in the smoky atmosphere of Moscow during the August 2010 extreme wildfires,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 53 (1), 49–57 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Sengupta, V. Samburova, C. Bhattarai, A. C. Watts, H. Moosmuller, and A. Y. Khlystov, “Polar semivolatile organic compounds in biomass-burning emissions and their chemical transformations during aging in an oxidation flow reactor,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (13), 8227–8250 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. A. Senashova, A. A. Aniskina, M. A. Plyashechnik, and T. V. Kostyakova, “Component composition of volatile compounds of conifers in central Siberia,” Khimiya Rastitel’nogo Syr’ya, No. 1, 77–85 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. R. T. Simoneit, “A review of biomarker compounds as source indicators and tracers for air pollution,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 6 (3), 159–169 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. R. Oros and B. R. T. Simoneit, “Identification and emission factors of molecular tracers in organic aerosols from biomass burning. Part 1. Temperate climate conifers,” Appl. Geochem. 16 (13), 1513–1544 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Popova and V. I. Makarov, “Chemical composition of smoldering combustion products of pine tree (Pinus sylvestris) and Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) wood, marsh tea (Ledum palustre) and lichen (Cladonia sp.),” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 24 (6), 488–492 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Zangrando, E. Barbaro, P. Zennaro, S. Rossi, N. M. Kehrwald, J. Gabrieli, and A. Gambaro, “Molecular markers of biomass burning in arctic aerosols,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (15), 8565–8574 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Rengarajan, P. Rajendran, N. Nandakumar, B. Lokeshkumar, P. Rajendran, and I. Nishigaki, “Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with special focus on cancer,” Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 5 (3), 182–189 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Wiriya, S. Chantara, S. Sillapapiromsuk, and N. H. Lin, “Emission profiles of PM10-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from biomass burning determined in chamber for assessment of air pollutants from open burning,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 16 (11), 2716–2727 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Dvorska, G. Lammel, and J. Klanova, “Use of diagnostic ratios for studying source apportionment and reactivity of ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons over central Europe,” Atmos. Environ. 45 (2), 420–427 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Pies, B. Hoffmann, J. Petrowsky, Y. Yang, T. A. Ternes, and T. Hofmann, “Characterization and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in river bank soils,” Chemosphere 72, 1594–1601 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Zhang, S. Zhang, C. Wan, D. Yue, Y. Ye, and X. Wang, “Source diagnostics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban road runoff, dust, rain and canopy throughfall,” Environ. Pollut. 153, 594–601 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. F. Rakhimov and E. V. Makienko, “Some methodic additions to the solution of the inverse problem for the reconstruction of the parameters of the disperse structure of mixed smokes,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 23 (4), 259–265 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. F. Rakhimov, V. S. Kozlov, and V. P. Shmargunov, “Time dynamics of the complex refractive index and particle microstructure according to data of spectronephelometer measurements in mixed composition smokes,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 25 (1), 51–61 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O. B. Popovicheva, V. S. Kozlov, G. Engling, E. Diapouli, N. M. Persiantseva, M. A. Timofeev, T.-S. Fan, D. Saraga, and K. Eleftheriadis, “Small-scale study of Siberian biomass burning: I. Smoke microstructure,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15, 117–128 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. C. Kalogridis, O. B. Popovicheva, G. Engling, E. Diapouli, K. Kawamura, E. Tachibana, and K. Eleftheriadis, “Smoke aerosol chemistry and aging of Siberian biomass burning emissions in a Large Aerosol Chamber,” Atmos. Environ. 185, 15–28 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. O. B. Popovicheva, V. S. Kozlov, R. F. Rakhimov, V. P. Shmargunov, E. D. Kireeva, N. M. Persiantseva, M. A. Timofeev, G. Engling, K. Eleftheriadis, E. Diapouli, M. V. Panchenko, R. Zimmermann, and J. Schnelle-Kreis, “Optical-microphysical and physical-chemical characteristics of Siberian biomass burning: Experiments in aerosol chamber,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 29 (5), 492–500 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. P. Cain, P. L. Gassman, H. Wang, and A. Laskin, “Micro-FTIR study of soot chemical composition-evidence of aliphatic hydrocarbons on nascent soot surfaces,” Phys. Chem. 12 (20), 5206–5218 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Thepnuan, S. Chantara, C. T. Lee, N. H. Lin, and Y. I. Tsai, “Molecular markers for biomass burning associated with the characterization of PM2.5 and component sources during dry season haze episodes in upper South East Asia,” Sci. Total Environ. 658, 708–722 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Froehner, M. Maceno, K. S. Machado, and M. Grube, “Health risk assessment of inhabitants exposed to PAHs particulate matter in air,” J. Environ. Sci. Health. A 46 (8), 817–823 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. EPA. Development of a Relative Potency Factor (Rpf) Approach for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Mixtures (External Review Draft, Suspended) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2010). https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_ report.cfm?Lab=NCEA&dirEntryId=194584. Cited November 6, 2021.

  32. V. Samburova, J. Connolly, M. Gyawali, R. L. Yatavelli, A. C. Watts, R. K. Chakrabarty, and A. Khlystov, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity,” Sci. Total Environ. 568, 391–401 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Tobiszewski and J. Namiesnik, “PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources,” Environ. Pollut. 162, 110–119 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to researchers from the Laboratory of Aerosol Optics of IAO SB RAS E.P. Yausheva and V.P. Schmargunov for their help in sampling.

Funding

The work was performed with the use of the equipment of the Atmosfera Common Use Center under the partial financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement no. 075-15-2021-661). The sample analysis and interpretation were supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-55-12 001) and the Development Program of the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of Moscow State University “The Future of the Planet and Global Environmental Changes.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Semenova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Ponomareva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semenova, A.V., Zavgorodnyaya, Y.A., Chichaeva, M.A. et al. Chemical Composition and Toxicity of Siberian Biomass Burning in the Large Aerosol Chamber (Tomsk). Atmos Ocean Opt 35 (Suppl 1), S38–S47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856022060215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856022060215

Keywords:

Navigation