Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of quick-to-court Gene on Some Aspects of Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

  • GENERAL GENETICS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

quick-to-court (qtc) is a recently discovered gene involved in the regulation of the mating behavior of Drosophila melanogaster males. Previously, we obtained flies with a complete deletion of this gene in the heterozygous state. This paper is focused on the study of the behavioral features of the new deletion mutant. The courtship ritual was studied in flies with ablated aristae, which caused a partial blocking of the acoustic channel of signal exchange between sexual partners. It was found that the removal of aristae leads to an increase in the time required to enter copulation and to a decrease in the frequency of copulations in flies with qtc deletion as well as in control flies. However, differences were found between mutant and control individuals. Removal of aristae in control females reduced the copulation rate to a greater extent than removal of aristae in control males, whereas in deletion mutants no differences between the sexes were found. In the case of control flies, the latency increased only by removal of aristae in females. In flies with a deletion of qtc, the latency increased when aristae both in females and in males were removed. The results suggest that qtc is involved in the development of behavioral sexual dimorphism, but the mechanism of its action is still unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Andersson, M., Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rendel, J.M., Mating of ebony vestigial and wild type Drosophila melanogaster in light and dark, Evolution, 1951, vol. 5, pp. 226—230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1951.tb02781.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobs, M.E., The influence of light on mating of D. melanogaster,Ecology, 1960, vol. 4, pp. 182—188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tompkins, L., Gross, A., Hall, J.C., et al., The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster,Behav. Genet., 1982, vol. 12, pp. 295—307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stocker, R.F., The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a rewiew, Cell Tissue Res., 1994, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. 3—26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyriacou, C.P. and Hall, J.C., The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila,Anim. Behav., 1982, vol. 30, pp. 794—801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80152-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ritchie, M.G., Halsey, E.J., and Gleason, J.M., Drosophila song as a species specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou and Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song, Anim. Behav., 1999, vol. 58, pp. 649—657. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, J.C., The mating of a fly, Science, 1994, vol. 264, pp. 1702—1714. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8209251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasbleiz, C., Ferveur, J.F., and Everaerts, C., Courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster revisited, Anim. Behav., 2006, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1001—1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayr, E., The role of the antennae in the mating behavior of female Drosophila,Evolution, 1950, vol. 4, pp. 149—154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennet-Clark, H.C., Acoustics of insect song, Nature, 1971, vol. 234, pp. 255—259. https://doi.org/10.1038/234255a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ewing, A.W., Functional aspects of Drosophila courtship, Biol. Rev., 1983, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 275—292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1983.tb00390.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenspan, R.J. and Ferveur, J.F., Courtship in Drosophila,Annu. Rev. Genet., 2000, vol. 34, pp. 205—232. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Schilcher, F., The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster,Anim. Behav., 1976, vol. 24, pp. 18—26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80095-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manning, A., Antennae and sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster,Science, 1967, vol. 158, pp. 136—137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook, R.M., Courtship processing in Drosophila melanogaster,Anim. Behav., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 349—358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(73)80077-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Göpfert, M.C. and Robert, D., Turning the key on Drosophila audition, Nature, 2001, vol. 411, p. 908. https://doi.org/10.1038/35082144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Göpfert, M.C. and Robert, D., The mechanical basis of Drosophila audition, J. Exp. Biol., 2002, vol. 205, pp. 1199—1208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bastock, M.A., A gene mutation which changes a behavior pattern, Evolution, 1956, vol. 10, pp. 421—439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1956.tb02868.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sturtevant, A.H., Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila,J. Anim. Behav., 1915, vol. 5, pp. 351—366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaines, P., Tompkins, L., Woodard, C.T., and Carlson, J.R., quick-to-court, a Drosophila mutant with elevated levels of sexual behavior, is defective in a predicted coiled-coil protein, Genetics, 2000, vol. 154, pp. 1627—1637.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Houot, B., Fraichard, S., Greenspan, R.J., and Ferveur, J.F., Genes involved in sex pheromone discrimination in Drosophila melanogaster and their background-dependent effect, PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7. e30799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Aradska, J., Bulat, T., Sialana, F.J., et al., Gel-free mass spectrometry analysis of Drosophila melanogaster heads, Proteomics, 2015, vol. 15, pp. 3356—3360. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kravchuk, O.I., Mikhailov, V.S., and Savitskii, M.Yu., A simple and efficient method of inducing targeted deletions in the drosophila genome, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1144—1148. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415110101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siegel, R.W. and Hall, J.C., Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1979, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 3430—3434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tompkins, L., Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila,Behav. Genet., 1984, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 411—440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 1995, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 289—300.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Belkina, E.G., Lazebnyi, O.E., and Vedenina, V.Yu., The role of acoustic signals in courtship behavior of Drosophila virilis,Biol. Bull., 2016, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 561—566. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0002332916060047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bastock, M., Courtship: An Ethological Study, Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cook, R.M., Courtship processing in Drosophila melanogaster,Anim. Behav., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 349—358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. von Schilcher, F., The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster,Anim. Behav., 1976, vol. 24, pp. 18—26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80095-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ewing, A.W., Influence of wing area on the courtship behavior of Drosophila melanogaster,Anim. Behav., 1964, vol. 12, pp. 316—320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472[64]90018-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tauber, E. and Eberl, D.F., Song production in auditory mutants of Drosophila: the role of sensory feedback, J. Comp. Physiol., A, 2001, vol. 187, no. 5, pp. 341—348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590100206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dickson, B.J., Wired for sex: the neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions, Science, 2008, vol. 322, pp. 904—909. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cande, J., Stern, D.L., Morita, T., et al., Looking under the lamp post: neither fruitless nor doublesex has evolved to generate divergent male courtship in Drosophila,Cell Rep., 2014, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 363—370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kimura, K., Hachiya, T., Koganezawa, M., et al., Fruitless and doublesex coordinate to generate male-specific neurons that can initiate courtship Neuron, 2008, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 759—769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rideout, E.J., Billeter, J.C., and Goodwin, S.F., The sex-determination genes fruitless and doublesex specify a neural substrate required for courtship song, Curr. Biol., 2007, vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 1473—1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Villella, A. and Hall, J.C., Courtship anomalies caused by doublesex mutations in Drosophila melanogaster,Genetics, 1996, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 331—344.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Datta, S.R., Vasconcelos, M.L., Ruta, V., et al., The Drosophila pheromone cVA activates a sexually dimorphic neural circuit, Nature, 2008, vol. 452, pp. 473—477. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stockinger, P., Kvitsiani, D., Rotkopf, S., et al., Neural circuitry that governs Drosophila male courtship behavior, Cell, 2005, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 795—807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Truebestein, L. and Leonard, T.A., Coiled-coils: the long and short of it, BioEssays, 2016, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 903—916. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-04-00177 A) and the state task of the Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences (topic no. 0108-2020-0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. I. Kravchuk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belkina, E.G., Lazebny, O.E. & Kravchuk, O.I. The Influence of quick-to-court Gene on Some Aspects of Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Russ J Genet 56, 177–182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420020027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420020027

Keywords:

Navigation