Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of 3D Printing Conditions of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol on the Mechanical Properties of Products Based on It

  • STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES
  • Published:
Polymer Science, Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of 3D printing conditions (sample position relative to the plane of the build plate, as well as temperature, extruder nozzle diameter, and infill density) on the mechanical properties of polyethylene terephthalate glycol samples has been studied. The main factor determining the elastic and strength properties of parts obtained by 3D printing is the porosity of the samples associated with the infill density and the orientation of the sample relative to the plane of the build plate during printing. Decreasing the nozzle diameter helps to reduce porosity and improve the mechanical properties of the product, but increases the duration of printing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. C. Ligon, R. Liska, J. Stampfl, M. Gurr, R. Mülhaupt, Chem. Rev. 117 (15), 10212 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. T. D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Q. Nguyen, D. Hui, J. Compos. B Eng. 143, 172 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Wickramasinghe, T. Do, and P. Tran, Polymers 12 (7), 1529 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Mercado-Colmenero, E. Mata-Garcia, M. Rodriguez-Santiago, C. Martin-Doñate, M. Dolores La Rubia, Polymers 12 (10), 2202 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. N. V. Shevlik, S. S. Strogonova, L. Yu. Tychinskaya, V. N. Koval’, L. A. Shcherbina, Polim. Mater. Tekhnol. 2 (3), 35 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. M. Obidin and S. V. Kotomin, Plast. Massy, Nos. 3–4, 42 (2021).

  7. M. H. Ali, S. Batai, and D. Sarbassov, Rapid Prototyp. J. 25 (6), 1108 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Dektyarev, A. O. Tovpinets, P. R. Grishin, V. N. Leitsin, V. N. Morozov, Naukoemk. Tekhnol. Mashinostr., No. 2, 41 (2020),

  9. K. M. B. Jansen, Int. Polym. Process. 13 (3), 309 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. Malloy, Plastic Part Design for Injection Molding (Hanser, Munich, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Maloch, E. Hnátková, M. Žaludek, and P. Krátký, Mater. Sci. Forum 919, 230 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Yao, Z. Deng, K. Zhang, and S. Li, Compos. B. Eng. 163, 393 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Markiz, E. Horváth, and P. Ficzere, Prod. Eng. Arch. 26 (3), 127 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Saenz, C. Otarola, K. Valladares, and J. Rojas, Addit. Manuf. 39, 101841 (2021).

  15. A. Gawel and S. Kuciel, Polymers 12 (12), 3056 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Radchenko, A. Titov, S. Khrapov, and A. Khoperskov, in Proceedings—2020 2nd International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2020, November 11–13, 2020, Lipetsk, Russia (IEEE, 2020), p. 533.

  17. P. Petrov, D. Agzamova, V. Pustovalov, E. Zhikhareva, B. Saprykin, I. Chmutin, N. Shmakova, in Abstracts of the 24th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming—ESAFORM 2021, April 14–16, 2021, online, p. 169.

  18. Y. Tlegenov, G. S. Hong, and W. F. Lu, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 54, 45 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Platek, K. Rajkowski, K. Cieplak, M. Sarzyński, J. Malachowski, R. Woźniak, J. Janiszewski, Polymers 12 (9), 2120 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. A. E. Jakus, N. R. Geisendorfer, P. L. Lewis, and R. N. Shah, Acta Biomater. 72, 94 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Liao, C. Liu, K. Lafdi, B. Coppola, G. Barra, L. Di Maio, L. Incarnato, Polymers 11 (9), 1487 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 17-79-30108.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    S. V. Kotomin, D. V. Kramarev & I. M. Obidin

  2. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, 125047, Moscow, Russia

    D. V. Kramarev, I. M. Obidin & S. V. Polunin

  3. Bauman State Technical University of Moscow, 105005, Moscow, Russia

    S. V. Kotomin

Authors
  1. S. V. Kotomin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. V. Kramarev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. M. Obidin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. V. Polunin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Kotomin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by S. Zatonsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotomin, S.V., Kramarev, D.V., Obidin, I.M. et al. Influence of 3D Printing Conditions of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol on the Mechanical Properties of Products Based on It. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 64, 617–623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X22700365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X22700365

Keywords:

Search

Navigation