Skip to main content
Log in

Multicriteria choice based on criteria importance methods with uncertain preference information

  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multicriteria choice methods are developed by applying methods of criteria importance theory with uncertain information on criteria importance and with preferences varying along their scale. Formulas are given for computing importance coefficients and importance scale estimates that are “characteristic” representatives of the feasible set of these parameters. In the discrete case, an alternative with the highest probability of being optimal (for a uniform distribution of parameter value probabilities) can be used as the best one. It is shown how such alternatives can be found using the Monte Carlo method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. V. Podinovskii, “Decision under multiple estimates for the importance coefficients of criteria and probabilities of values of uncertain factors in the aim function,” Autom. Remote Control 65 (11), 1817–1833 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Podinovski, “Conciliatory solutions of multicriteria choice problems,” Information Technologies in Science, Education, and Control: Proceedings of International Conference IT + S&E`16, Gurzuf, May 22–June 1, 2016, Ed. by E. L. Gloriozov (INIT, Moscow, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. D. Dawes and B. Corrigat, “Linear models in decision making,” Psychol. Bull. 81, 95–106 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. G. Stillwell, D. A. Seaver, and W. Edwards, “A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision-making,” Organizational Behav. Hum. Perform. 28, 62–77 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Solymosi and J. Dompi, “Method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights,” Eur. J. Operat. Res. 26, 35–41 (1985).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. F. J. Barron, “Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights,” Acta Psychol. 80, 91–103 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Edwards and H. F. Barron, “SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement,” Organizational Behav. Hum. Perform. 60, 306–325 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Roszkowska, “Rank ordering criteria weighting methods: A comparative overview,” Optimum: Stud. Ekon. 65 (5), 14–33 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Danielson and L. Ekenberg, “Using surrogate weights for handling preference strength in multi-criteria decisions,” in Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation, Ed. by B. Kamiński, G. Kersten, and T. Szapiro (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 107–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “Decision quality using ranked attribute weights,” Manage. Sci. 42, 1515–1523 (1996).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Belton and T. J. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach (Kluwer, Boston, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Podinovski, “Parametric importance of criteria and intervals of value tradeoff uncertainty in the analysis of multicriteria problems,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 48 (11), 1979–1998 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. V. V. Podinovski, Introduction to the Theory of Criteria Importance in Multicriteria Decision Making (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. V. Podinovski, M. A. Potapov, A. P. Nelyubin, and O. V. Podinovskaya, “Theory of criterion importance: State of the art and directions of further development,” The 12th All-Russia Conference on Control Problems VSPU-2014, Moscow 16–19 June, 2014 (Inst. Probl. Upr. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2014), pp. 7697–7702. http://vspu2014.ipu.ru/node/8581.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Podinovski, “Analysis of multicriteria choice problems by methods of the theory of criteria importance, based on computer systems of decision-making support,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 47 (2), 221–225 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. V. V. Podinovski and M. A. Potapov, “Theoretical foundations and systems of multicriteria decision-making support,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Technologies in Science, Education, Telecommunications, and Business, Gurzuf, Ukraine, May 20–30, 2007, Otkrytoe Obrazovanie, supplement, 87–89 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. P. Nelyubin and V. V. Podinovski, “Relation between qualitative and quantitative criteria importance in multicriteria decision making problems,” Otkrytoe Obrazovanie, 89 (6),108–115 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. C. Fishburn, Decision and Value Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. D. P. Kroese, T. Taimre, and Z. I. Botev, Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods (Wiley, New York, 2011).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Nelyubin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.P. Nelyubin, V.V. Podinovski, 2017, published in Zhurnal Vychislitel’noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki, 2017, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 1494–1502.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelyubin, A.P., Podinovski, V.V. Multicriteria choice based on criteria importance methods with uncertain preference information. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 57, 1475–1483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542517090093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542517090093

Keywords

Navigation