Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the optimum pressure of the intercooler and the regenerator in the Bryton cycle based on exergy and energy analysis

  • Published:
Thermophysics and Aeromechanics Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper, energy and exergy analysis has been done for irreversible Brayton cycle with regenerator, reheater, and intercooler. In this work, the influence of the different parameters such as the efficiency of cycle’s components surveyed based on the first and the second laws of thermodynamics. The lost exergy in the different components and the total lost exergy of the irreversible Brayton cycle are calculated under several conditions. Also, the optimum pressure of the intercooler and the reheater are obtained under different conditions. To obtain the optimum pressure, irreversible Brayton cycle with regenerator, reheater, and intercooler is simulated in engineering equation solver software and optimum pressure is obtained based on the first and the second laws of thermodynamics in each simulation. The obtained optimum pressures are compared with the geometric mean of the low and the high pressure of the cycle in each simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

act:

actual

BC:

Brayton cycle

BCE:

Brayton cycle efficiency

c:

compressor

CTBCC:

combustion-turbine based combined cycle

e:

exit

EES:

engineering equation solver

h :

enthalpy

i:

inlet

IBC:

inverse Brayton cycles

IRBC:

irreversible Brayton cycle

in:

intercooler

p :

pressure

PR:

pressure ratio

Q :

heat transfer

R:

regenerator

Rev:

reversible

s :

entropy

T:

turbine

Tot:

total

W:

work

η :

efficiency

∞:

ambient

References

  1. L. Chen, D. Ni, Z. Zhang, and F. Sun, Exergetic performance optimization for new combined intercooled regenerative Brayton and inverse Brayton cycles, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, Vol. 102, P. 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. del Rio Oliveira, V.L. Scalon, and V.P. Repinaldo, Ecological optimization of an irreversible Brayton cycle with regeneration, inter-cooling and reheating, Appl. Math. Modelling, 2015, Vol. 39, P. 6830–6844.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Chen, W. Wang, F. Sun, and C. Wu, Closed intercooled regenerator Brayton-cycle with constant-temperature heat-reservoirs, Applied Energy, 2004, Vol. 77, P. 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Haseli, Efficiency of Irreversible Brayton Cycles at Minimum Entropy Generation, Appl. Math. Modelling, 2016, Vol. 40, Iss. 19–20, P. 8366–8376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Martinaitis, G. Streckiene, D. Biekša, G. Šiupsinškas, and J. Bielskus, Functional exergy efficiency of an air heat recovery exchanger under varying environmental temperature, Inter. J. Exergy, 2018, Vol. 25, P. 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Değerli and M. Özilgen, The mode of interaction of the constituents of a microbial system determines the attainable exergy utilisation, International Journal of Exergy, 2018, Vol. 25, P. 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Yilanli, Ö. Altuntaş, E. Açıkkalp, and T.H. Karakoc, Aircraft fuel system energy and exergy analysis under hot day conditions, Inter. J. Exergy, 2018, Vol. 25, P. 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ashouri, M.H. Ahmadi, M. Feidt, and F.R. Astaraei, Exergy and energy analysis of a regenerative organic Rankine cycle based on flat plate solar collectors, Mechanics & Industry, 2017, Vol. 18, P. 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Ahmadi, M. Ashouri, S.A. Sadatsakkak, and M.H. Ahmadi, Optimization performance of irreversible refrigerators base on evolutionary algorithm, Mechanics & Industry, 2016, Vol. 17, P. 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Elahifar, E. Assareh, and M. Nedaei, Exergy analysis and optimization of the Rankine cycle in steam power plants using the firefly algorithm, Mechanics & Industry, 2018, Vol. 19, P. 505.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.H.K. Manesh and M.A. Rosen, Combined cycle and steam gas-fired power plant analysis through exergoeconomic and extended combined pinch and exergy methods, J. Energy Engng, 2018, Vol. 144, P. 04018010–1–04018010–;17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L.E. Lingo and U. Roy, Design for implementation strategy for designing a sustainable building using the geosolar exergy storage technology: case study, J. Energy Engng, 2015, Vol. 141, P. 04014018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Khaliq, Energetic and exergetic performance evaluation of a gas turbine-powered cogeneration system using reverse Brayton refrigeration cycle for inlet air cooling, J. Energy Engng, 2016, Vol. 142, P. 04015029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Atif and F.A. Al-Sulaiman, Energy and exergy analyses of recompression Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower through a two-tank thermal storage system, J. Energy Engng, 2018, Vol. 144, P. 04018036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.K. Tyagi, G.M. Chen, Q. Wang, and S.C. Kaushik, Thermodynamic analysis and parametric study of an irreversible regenerative-intercooled-reheat Brayton cycle, Inter. J. Thermal Sciences, 2006, Vol. 45, P. 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Wang, L. Chen, F. Sun, and C. Wu, Power optimization of an endoreversible closed intercooled regenerated Brayton-cycle coupled to variable-temperature heat-reservoirs, Applied Energy, 2005, Vol. 82, P. 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Sanjay and B.N. Prasad, Energy and exergy analysis of intercooled combustion-turbine based combined cycle power plant, Energy, 2013, Vol. 59, P. 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Yang, L.G. Chen, and F.R. Sun, Exergetic performance optimization of an endoreversible variable-temperature heat reservoirs intercooled regenerated Brayton cogeneration plant, J. Energy Institute, 2016, Vol. 89, P. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Chandramouli, M.S.S. Srinivasa Rao, and K. Ramji, Parametric and optimization studies of reheat and regenerative Braysson cycle, Energy, 2015, Vol. 93, Part 2, P. 2146–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R.M. Abd El-Maksoud, Binary Brayton cycle with two isothermal processes, Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, Vol. 73, P. 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M.M. Naserian, S. Farahat, and F. Sarhaddi, New exergy analysis of a regenerative closed Brayton cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, Vol. 134, P. 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. V. Zare and M. Hasanzadeh, Energy and exergy analysis of a closed Brayton cycle-based combined cycle for solar power tower plants, Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, Vol. 128, P. 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Jansen, T. Bello-Ochende, and J.P. Meyer, Integrated solar thermal Brayton cycles with either one or two regenerative heat exchangers for maximum power output, Energy, 2015, Vol. 86, P. 737–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.A. Jokar, M.H. Ahmadi, M. Sharifpur, J.P. Meyer, F. Pourfayaz, and T. Ming, Thermodynamic evaluation and multi-objective optimization of molten carbonate fuel cell-supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle hybrid system, Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, Vol. 153, P. 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Açıkkalp, Ecologic and sustainable objective thermodynamic evaluation of molten carbonate fuel cell-supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle hybrid system, Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, Vol. 42, P. 6272–6280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G.-C. Fatemeh and G. Esmaeil, Application of exergy analysis to improve the heat integration efficiency in a hydrocracking process, Energy & Environment, 2017, Vol. 28, P. 564–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N.R. Kumar, K.R. Krishna, and A.V.S.R. Raju, Performance improvement and exergy analysis of gas turbine power plant with alternative regenerator and intake air cooling, Energy Engineering, 2007, Vol. 104, P. 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S.O. Oyedepo, R.O. Fagbenle, S.S. Adefila, and M.M. Alam, Performance evaluation of selected gas turbine power plants in Nigeria using energy and exergy methods, World J. Engng, 2015, Vol. 12, P. 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Hajabdollahi and H. Hajabdollahi, 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of gas turbine CCHP plant with variable ambient temperature, Energy Equipment and Systems, 2017, No. 5, P. 285–298.

  30. A. Noorpoor, P. Heidarnejad, N. Hashemian, and A. Ghasemi, A thermodynamic model for exergetic performance and optimization of a solar and biomass-fuelled multigeneration system, Energy Equipment and Systems, 2016, Vol. 4, P. 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Hanafizadeh and P. Maghsoudi, Exergy, economy, and pressure drop analyses for optimal design of recuperator used in microturbine, Energy Equipment and Systems, 2017, Vol. 5, P. 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Adibi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adibi, T., Adibi, O. Evaluation of the optimum pressure of the intercooler and the regenerator in the Bryton cycle based on exergy and energy analysis. Thermophys. Aeromech. 28, 879–889 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864321060123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864321060123

Keywords

Navigation