Skip to main content
Log in

Thalamic Auditory Center Activity in Healthy Children and Patients with Acute Bacterial Meningitis

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide our data on the VI peak of brainstem acoustic evoked potentials (BAEPs) in healthy children and patients in the acute phase of bacterial meningitis (BM). Our aim was to evaluate the functional activity of the thalamic auditory center in children with severe lesion of the central nervous system (acute bacterial inflammation of its meninges). The study involved 120 children: 88 healthy controls and 32 patients in the acute phase of BM, all were aged 3–5 years old (mean age 3.7 ± 1.2 years). BAEPs were registered according to the guidelines, but special attention was paid towards the existence, latency, and amplitude of its VI peak. Statistical analysis was performed using t-criteria (p < 0.05) as well as ROC-analysis for determination of the threshold value with optimal value of sensitivity and specificity. The VI peak was not present in 2 children out of 88 healthy controls (2.3%) and in 19 patients with BM (60%). Diffuse lengthening of the I–III and III–V intervals were registered, with III and V peaks amplitudes lowering in children with BM. Average latency of the VI peak in controls and BM group were 7.02 ± 0.27 and 7.82 ± 0.63 ms, accordingly (significant difference, р < 0.001); amplitudes were 0.223 ± 0.127 and 0.089 ± 0.057 µV (significant difference, р < 0.001). Also, with ROC-analysis, it was established that low amplitude of the VI peak (≤0.09 µV) is associated with a bad outcome of the disease with severe neurologic deficit (sensitivity 90% and specificity 60%). Thus, BAEPs VI peak in healthy children aged 3–5 years was registered in 98% of the cases. In the acute period of BM it was registered only in 40% of the cases. Latency and amplitude of this peak in the BM group is significantly different from the healthy controls of the same age. This may reflect the unspecific slowing of the conduction along the brainstem auditory pathways and functional inhibition of the brain structures, supposedly generating a VI peak, a medial geniculate body and probably some other thalamic nuclei. All these nuclei compose the thalamic auditory center. Also, according to ROC-analysis, it was established that a low amplitude of the VI peak (≤0.09 µV) is associated with a bad outcome of the disease with severe neurologic deficit (sensitivity 90% and specificity 60%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lesicko, A.M.H. and Geffen, M.N., Diverse functions of the auditory cortico-collicular pathway, Hear. Res., 2022, p. 108488.

  2. Antunes, F.M. and Malmierca, M.S., Corticothalamic pathways in auditory processing: recent advances and insights from other sensory systems, Front. Neural Circuits, 2021, vol. 15, p. 721186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Legatt, A.D., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: methodology, interpretation, and clinical application, Aminoff’s Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, Aminoff, M.J., Ed., Elsevier, 2012, 6th ed., p. 519.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Gnezditskiy, V.V. and Piradov, M.A., Neirofiziologiya komy i narusheniya soznaniya (Neurophysiology of Coma and Impaired Consciousness), Ivanovo: P-resSto, 2015.

  5. Biacabe, B., Chevallier, J.M., Avan, P., and Bonfils, P., Functional anatomy of auditory brainstem nuclei: application to the anatomical basis of brainstem auditory evoked potentials, Auris Nasus Larynx, 2001, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiappa, K.H. and Ropper, A.H., Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (first of two parts), N. Engl. J. Med., 1982, vol. 306, no. 19, p. 1140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balogh, A., Wedekind, C., and Klug, N., Does wave VI of BAEP pertain to the prognosis of coma? Neurophysiol. Clin., 2001, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Efimov, O.I., Efimova, V.L., and Rozhkov, V.P., Delayed auditory brainstem transmission in children with developmental speech and language disorders and learning difficulties, Sens. Syst., 2014, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emelina, D.A., Makarov, I.V., Gasanov, R.F., The method of evoked potentials in the study of specific speech disorders in children, Sots. Klin. Psikhiatriya, 2019, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Voitenkov, V.B., Vilnits, A.A., Skripchenko, N.V., et al., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials as the prognostic tool of the functional recovery in children after acute bacterial meningitis, Zh. Infektol., 2016, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuznetsova, E., Speech retardation: a neurophysiological approach, Vrach, 2017, no. 8, p. 47.

  12. Mamedova, S.M., Maltseva, N.L., and Andreeva, S.D., Anatomicheskaya terminologiya: uchebnoye posobiye (Anatomical Terminology: a Tutorial), Kirov: Kirov Gos. Med. Univ., 2019.

  13. Silkis, I.G., A role of the basal ganglia in reorganization of receptive fields of neurons in the primary auditory cortex and movement selection during training (a hypothetical mechanism), Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deiat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 2019, vol. 69, no. 6, p. 657.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekusheva, E.V., Vendrova, M.I., Danilov, A.B., and Vein, A.M., The contribution of the right and left hemispheres of the brain to the polymorphism and heterogeneity of the pyramidal syndrome, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2005, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw, N.A., The temporal relationship between the brainstem and primary cortical auditory evoked potentials, Prog. Neurobiol., 1995, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stone, J.L., Calderon-Arnulphi, M., Watson, K.S., et al., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials—a review and modified studies in healthy subjects, J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer, C., Bognar, L., Turjman, F., and Lapras, C., Auditory evoked potentials in a patient with a unilateral lesion of the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, vol. 96, no. 3, p. 261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartlett, E.L., The organization and physiology of the auditory thalamus and its role in processing acoustic features important for speech perception, Brain Lang., 2013, vol. 126, no. 1, p. 29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekusheva, E.V., Sensorimotor integration in lesions of the central nervous system: clinical and pathogenetic aspects, Doctoral (Med.) Dissertation, Moscow: Institution of Advanced Training of Federal Medical and Biological Agency, 2016, p. 362.

  20. Voitenkov, V.B., Sinkin, M.V., Skripchenko, N.V., et al., Brain bioelectrical activity in children with acute viral encephalitis, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2021, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01085-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Voitenkov.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

All studies were carried out in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent updates, as well as the “Rules of Clinical Practice in the Russian Federation,” approved by the Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of June 19, 2003, No. 266, and approved by the local ethical committee of the Children’s Scientific and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia (St. Petersburg).

INFORMED CONSENT

Each legal representative of the study participant provided a voluntary written informed consent signed by him after being explained the potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the upcoming study.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

CONTRIBUTIONS

V.B. Voitenkov—the concept of the article, the collection and analysis of the data obtained, the text of the manuscript, and checking the intellectual content of the article; V.N. Komantsev—the concept of the article, collection and analysis of the data obtained, the text of the manuscript, and checking the intellectual content of the article; E.V. Ekusheva—the concept of the article, analysis of the data obtained, the text of the manuscript, and checking the intellectual content of the article; A.V. Klimkin—the concept of the article, the collection and analysis of the data obtained, the text of the manuscript, and checking the intellectual content of the article; M.A. Bedova—collection and analysis of the obtained data, the text of the manuscript, and arranging the manuscript.

Additional information

Translated by A. Deryabina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voitenkov, V.B., Komantsev, V.N., Ekusheva, E.V. et al. Thalamic Auditory Center Activity in Healthy Children and Patients with Acute Bacterial Meningitis. Hum Physiol 48, 582–586 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722600187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722600187

Keywords:

Navigation