Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Audio–Visual Stimulation Automatically Controlled by the Bioelectric Potentials from Human Brain and Heart

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have compared the effects of open-loop and closed-loop audio–visual stimulation (AVS) generated on-line on the basis of subjects’ bioelectrical activity. In the first experiment, volunteers were presented with closed-loop AVS consisting of photic- and music-like stimuli generated by transformation of the current parameters of subjects’ electroencephalogram (EEG) and heart rhythm. In the second experiment, prearranged composition of photic and musical stimuli was used without feedback from the current bioelectric activity of the subjects. It has been found that the most pronounced shifts in objective and subjective indicators, such as the maximum increase in the EEG α rhythm power relative to the background, positive emotional reactions, and shifts in the functional state of the body, are recorded when AVS is controlled by the current electrophysiological characteristics of the subjects. These effects result from the involvement of interoceptive mechanisms in the system of mechanisms responsible for normalization of human functional state under AVS, i.e., the mechanisms of multisensory integration and neuroplasticity and the resonance mechanisms of the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Golovin, M.S., Balioz, N.V., Aizman, R.I., and Krivoshchekov, S.G., Effect of audiovisual stimulation on the psychophysiological functions in track-and-field athletes, Hum. Physiol., 2015, vol. 41, no. 5, p. 532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golovin, M.S., Balioz, N.V., Krivoschekov, S.G., and Aizman, R.I., Integration of functional, psychophysiological, and biochemical processes in athletes after audiovisual stimulation, Hum. Physiol., 2018, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glazachev, O.S., Klassina, S.Ya., Bobyleva, O.V., and Klassnja, A., Effects of polymodal rhythmic sensory influences on the human CNS state and autonomic functions, Hum. Physiol., 2010, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arabi, L.S., Sysoev, V.N., and Kremneva, T.V., Audio-visual stimulation in comprehensive treatment of psychosomatic diseases, Vestn. Psikhoter., 2011, no. 39 (44), p. 9.

  5. Ashanina, E.N. and Kulakov, D.V., Effectiveness of partial audiovisual impact and biological feedback for correction of desadaptive mental states of specialists of extreme professions, Vestn. Psikhoter., 2011, no. 39 (44), p. 85.

  6. Tang, H.Y., Vitiello, M.V., Perlis, M., and Riegel, B., Open-loop neurofeedback audiovisual stimulation: A pilot study of its potential for sleep induction in older adults, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2015, vol. 40, no. 3, p. 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang, H.Y., Riegel, B., McCurry, S.M., and Vitiello, M.V., Open-loop audio-visual stimulation (AVS): A useful tool for management of insomnia? Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2016, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., et al., Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2017, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tegeler, C.H., Cook, J.F., Tegeler, C.L., et al., Clinical, hemispheric, and autonomic changes associated with use of closed-loop, allostatic neurotechnology by a case series of individuals with self-reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress, BMC Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levi, T., Bonifazi, P., Massobrio, P., and Chiappalone, M., Editorial: Closed-loop systems for next-generation neuroprostheses, Front. Neurosci., 2018, vol. 12, p. 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fedotchev, A.I., Bondar’, A.T., and Semenov, V.S., Efficiency of photostimulation controlled by subject’s EEG decreases under the conditions of feedback delay, Hum. Physiol., 2016, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fedotchev, A.I., Zhuravlev, G.I., Eksina, K.I., et al., Evaluation of efficiency of musical EEG neurointerface with additional control contour from heart rhythm, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I.M. Sechenova, 2018, vol. 104, no. 1, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kataev, A.A., Bakhchina, A.V., Polevaya, S.A., and Fedotchev, A.I. Connection between subjective and objective estimates of human functional state (approbation of rapid test for measurement of stress level), Vestn. Psikhofiziol., 2017, no. 2, p. 62.

  14. Polevaya, S.A., Nekrasova, M.M., Runova, E.V., et al., Discrete monitoring and telemetry of the cardiac rhythm during working on a computer to assess and prevent fatigue and stress, Med. Al’m., 2013, no. 2 (26), p. 151.

  15. Fedotchev, A.I., Bondar’, A.T., Bakhchina, A.V., et al., Music-acoustic signals controlled by subject’s brain potentials in the correction of unfavorable functional states, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 2016, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, A.R., An oscillatory neural network model that demonstrates the benefits of multisensory learning, Cognit. Neurodyn., 2018, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maes, P.J., Buhmann, J., and Leman, M., 3Mo: A model for music-based biofeedback, Front. Neurosci., 2016, vol. 10, no. 548, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quadt, L., Critchley, H.D., and Garfinkel, S.N., The neurobiology of interoception in health and disease, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2018, vol. 1428, no. 1, p. 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo, M.C. and Widge, A.S., Closed-loop neuromodulation systems: next-generation treatments for psychiatric illness, Int. Rev. Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Piradov, M.A., Chernikova, L.A., and Supone-va, N.A., Brain plasticity and modern neurorehabilitation technologies, Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2018, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Vitaliy Semenovich Semenov, Chief Expert of the Institute of Cell Biophysics (Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino), for his assistance in software development.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nos. 18-013-01225, 18-413-520 006, and 19-013-00095.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Fedotchev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and with the ethical standards of the Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences (Pushchino). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

Additional information

Translated by E.V. Makeeva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fedotchev, A.I., Parin, S.B., Polevaya, S.A. et al. Effects of Audio–Visual Stimulation Automatically Controlled by the Bioelectric Potentials from Human Brain and Heart. Hum Physiol 45, 523–526 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719050025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719050025

Keywords:

Navigation