Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing the Speed and Accuracy of an EMG Interface in Practical Applications

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the development of robotic rehabilitation technologies and modern electromyography (EMG) command-proportional control, the issues of muscle activity signal processing remain extremely relevant. In this paper we propose several options for optimizing the processing techniques for EMG signals. Our rather simple approaches improve the efficiency of the EMG interface in various parameters. In particular, the new method of signal averaging involves the calculation of two moving averages: the main “slow” average and an additional “fast” average. If the difference between the mean values exceeds a threshold, the slow mean is equated to the fast one. Another approach includes the use of a nonlinear (power) function for the proportional control of an object. The proposed approaches were tested in tasks on controlling virtual objects by 15 healthy subjects. It was found that the criteria such as the interface response time and the smoothness of movement of an object, as well as the accuracy and speed of control, were optimized. The results can be used in control systems of a wide range of robotic devices, including exoskeletons, prostheses, and wheelchairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ackerman, E., Berkeley bionics introduces eLEGS robotic exoskeleton, IEEE Spectrum, 2010, Oct. 9. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/medical-robots/berkeley-bionics-introduces-elegs-robotic-exoskeleton.

  2. Esquenazi, A., Talaty, M., Packel, A., et al., The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2012, vol. 91, no. 11, p. 911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shultz, A., Robotic exoskeleton: for a better quality of life, 2012. http://www.maxonmotor.com/maxon/view/ application/EXOSKELET%0AT-AB.

  4. Kasaoka, K. and Sankai, Y., Predictive control estimating operator’s intention for stepping-up motion by exo-skeleton type power assist system HAL, Proc. 2001 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems “Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium,” Piscataway, NJ: Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2001, vol. 3, p. 1578.

  5. Wang, S., Wang, L., Meijneke, C., et al., Design and control of the MINDWALKER exoskeleton, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2015, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hershler, C. and Milner, M., An optimality criterion for processing electromyographic (EMG) signals relating to human locomotion, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1978, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyano, H., Masuda, T., and Sadoyama, T., A note on the time constant in low-pass filtering of rectified surface EMG, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1980, vol. 27, no. 5, p. 274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiong, F.Q. and Shwedyk, E., Some aspects of nonstationary myoelectric signal processing, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1987, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Alessio, T., Some results on the optimization of a digital processor for surface EMG signals, Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 24, no. 7, p. 625.

  10. D’Alessio, T., Analysis of a digital EMG signal processor in dynamic conditions, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1985, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meek, S.G. and Fetherston, S.J., Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of myoelectric filters for prosthesis control, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 1992, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, E. and Meek, S.G., Adaptive filtering of the electromyographic signal for prosthetic control and force estimation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1995, vol. 42, no. 10, p. 1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobsen, S.C., Meek, S.G., and Fullmer, R.R., Adaptive myoelectric filter, IEEE/Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conf., Piscataway, NJ: Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., 1984, p. 592.

  14. Evans, H.B., Pan, Z., Parker, P.A., et al., Signal processing for proportional myoelectric control, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1984, vol. 31, no. 2, p. 207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clancy, E.A., Electromyogram amplitude estimation with adaptive smoothing window length, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1999, vol. 46, no. 6, p. 717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buckthorpe, M.W., Hannah, R., Pain, T.G., et al., Reliability of neuromuscular measurements during explosive isometric contractions, with special reference to electromyography normalization techniques, Muscle Nerve, 2012, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lyu, M., Lambelet, C., Woolley, D., et al., Training wrist extensor function and detecting unwanted movement strategies in an EMG-controlled visuomotor task, Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Piscataway, NJ: Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2017, p. 1549.

  18. Lobov, S.A., Mironov, V.I., Kastalskiy, I.A., et al., Combined use of command-proportional control of external robotic devices based on electromyography signals, Sovrem. Tehnol. Med., 2015, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lobov, S., Krilova, N., Kastalskiy, I., et al., A Human-Computer Interface based on Electromyography Command-Proportional Control, Proc. 4th Int. Congr. on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics, NEUROTECHNIX 2016, Setúbal: SciTePress, 2016, p. 57.

  20. Lobov, S., Krilova, N., Kastalskiy, I., et al., Latent factors limiting the performance of sEMG-interfaces, Sensors, 2018, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation under the framework of Government Assignment No. 8.2487.2017/PCh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lobachevsky State University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

    S. A. Lobov, N. P. Krylova, A. P. Anisimova, V. I. Mironov & V. B. Kazantsev

Authors
  1. S. A. Lobov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. P. Krylova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. P. Anisimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. I. Mironov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. B. Kazantsev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Lobov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All subjects gave their written consent; the study was approved by the Committee for Bioethics of the Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (Protocol No. 6 of July 06, 2017).

Additional information

Translated by E.V. Makeeva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lobov, S.A., Krylova, N.P., Anisimova, A.P. et al. Optimizing the Speed and Accuracy of an EMG Interface in Practical Applications. Hum Physiol 45, 145–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719010109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719010109

Keywords:

Search

Navigation