Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral and electrographical features of recognition of forward-masked complex images: The effect of categorical similarity of the target and masking stimuli

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments, the subjects recognized images of two categories, “animals” and “objects.” The images of the same categories differing from the target stimuli were used as the masking stimuli. We found that the efficacy of forward-masking depended on categorical similarity of the masking and target stimuli. The probability of a correct response was lower and the reaction time and its variance were higher when we used stimuli of the same category compared with presentation of stimuli of different categories. Categorical similarity of masking and target stimuli induced difficulties with response, which were accompanied by decreases in the amplitudes of the N2 and P3 components of the evoked potentials. These effects were more pronounced during recognition of animals compared to objects. The results are discussed from the point of view of negative priming and the distractor effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tipper, S.P., The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects, Quarterly J. Exp. Psychol., 1985, vol. 37A, p. 571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox, E., Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty, Percept. Psychophys., 1994, vol. 56, p. 565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erikse, B.A. and Erikse, C.W., Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a non-search task, Percept. Psychophys., 1974, vol. 16, p. 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, E., Cross-language priming from ignored words: evidence for a common representational system in bilinguals, J. Mem. Lang., 1996, vol. 35, p. 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breitmeyer, B. and Ogmen, H., Visual Masking. Time Slices through Conscious and Unconscious Vision, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Macknik, S.L., Visual masking approaches to visual awareness, Prog. Brain Res., 2006, vol. 155, p. 177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krol’, V.M. and Sosina, V.D., Visual perception of images masked with similar figures, Fiziol. Chel., 1985, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 859.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jas-kowski, P., The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: a case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis, Conscious Cogn., 2008, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Enns, J.T. and Oriet, C., Visual similarity in masking and priming: the critical role of task relevance, Adv. Cogn. Psychol., 2007, vol. 3, p. 211.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachmann, T., Luiga, I., and Poder, E., Forward masking of faces by spatially quantized random and structured masks: on the roles of wholistic configuration, local features, and spatial-frequency spectra in perceptual identification, Psychol. Res., 2004, vol. 69, p. 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikhailova, E.S., Gerasimenko, N.Yu., and Ovsienko, A.V., Recognition of forward-masked complex and simple images, Hum. Physiol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brydges, C.R., Clunies-Ross, K., Clohessy, M., et al., Dissociable components of cognitive control: an eventrelated potential (ERP) study of response inhibition and interference suppression, PLoS ONE, 2012, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e34482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eimer, M. and Schlaghecken, F., Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Performance, 1998, vol. 24, p. 1737.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, J.D., Lleras, A., Oriet, C., and Enns, J.T., A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2007, vol. 14, p. 908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaskowski, P., Bialunska, A., Tomanek, M., and Verleger, R., Mask- and distractor-triggered inhibitory processes in the priming of motor responses: an EEG study, Psychophysiology, 2008, vol. 45, p. 70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sumner, P., Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect, Experim. Psychol., 2008, vol. 55, p. 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sigman, M. and Dehaene, S., Parsing a cognitive task: a characterization of the mind’s bottleneck, PLoS Biol., 2005, vol. 3, no. 2, p. e37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Folstein, J.R. and Van Petten, C., Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review, Psychophysiology, 2008, vol. 45, p. 152.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartholow, B.D., Monica, A., Riordan, M.A., et al., Psychophysiological evidence of response conflict and strategic control of responses in affective priming, J. Experiment. Social Psychol., 2009, vol. 45, p. 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartolow, B.D. and Dickter, C.L., Ingroup categorization and response conflict: interactive effects of target race, flanker compability, and infrequency on N2 amplitude, Psychophysiology, 2010, vol. 47, p. 596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Donchin, E. and Coles, M.G.H., Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?, Behav. Brain Sciences, 1988, vol. 11, p. 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Larrea, L. and Cézanne-Bert, G., P3, positive slow wave and working memory load: a study on the functional correlates of slow wave activity, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, vol. 108, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Henson, R.N., Mouchlianitis, E., Matthews, W.J., and Kouiderc, S., Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming, Neuroimage, 2008, vol. 40, p. 884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schacter, D.L., Wig, G.S., and Stevens, W.D., Reductions in cortical activity during priming, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2007, vol. 17, p. 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grill-Spector, K., The neural basis of object perception, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2003, vol. 13, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber, M., Thompson-Schill, S.L., Osherson, D., et al., Predicting judged similarity of natural categories from their neural representations, Neuropsychol., 2009, vol. 47, p. 859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mace, M.J.M., Thorpe, S.J., and Fabre-Thorpe, M., Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts?, Eur. J. Neurosci., 2005, vol. 21, p. 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Freedman, D.J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., and Miller, E.K., Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex, Science, 2001, vol. 291, p. 312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brittain, P.J., Surguladze, S., McKendrick, A.M., and Ffytche, D.H., Backward and forward visual masking in schizophrenia and its relation to global motion and global form perception, Schizophrenia Res., 2010, vol. 124, p. 134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Mikhailova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.A. Kalinin, N.Yu. Gerasimenko, A.V. Slavutskaya, E.S. Mikhailova, 2014, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2014, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 5–17.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalinin, S.A., Gerasimenko, N.Y., Slavutskaya, A.V. et al. Behavioral and electrographical features of recognition of forward-masked complex images: The effect of categorical similarity of the target and masking stimuli. Hum Physiol 40, 355–366 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119714030086

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119714030086

Keywords

Navigation