Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Specifying Data Quality Requirements through Web Functionalities – MOSQAF

  • Published:
Programming and Computer Software Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An acceptable level of quality in data is nowadays one of the main objectives for any kind of organization that wishes its business processes to prosper. Thus, introducing mechanisms or artefacts focused on the data quality management is a crucial requirement for the analysts if the level of quality of data for the functionality at hand is to be ensured. Considering the benefits offered through the use of web applications, and knowing that a high percentage of companies worldwide use this type of applications. The main objective of this work is to provide the developers with a methodology necessary to specify data quality requirements, in order to prevent data quality issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.
Fig. 19.
Fig. 20.
Fig. 21.
Fig. 22.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Haper, E. and Zubrow, D., Editors’ introduction: should you trust your data, in Software Quality Professional, American Society for Quality 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballou, D.P. and Pazer, H.L., Modeling completeness versus consistency tradeoffs in information decision contexts, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2003, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn, B.K., Strong, D.M., and Wang, R.Y., Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance, Commun. ACM, 2002, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pipino, L., Lee, Y., and Wang, R., Data quality assessment, Commun. ACM, 2002, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scannapieco, M. and Berti-Equille, L., Report from the first and second international workshops on information quality in information systems- IQIS 2004 and IQIS 2005 in conjunction with ACM SIGMOD/PODS conferences, SIGMOD Record, 2006, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 50–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shankaranayanan, G. and Cai, Y., A web services application for the data quality management in the B2B networked environment, Proc. 38th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Big Island, HI, 2005.

  7. Cai, Y. and Shankaranarayanan, G., Managing data quality in inter-organisational data networks, Int. J. Inf. Qual., 2007, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 254–271.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loshin, D., The Practitioner’s Guide to Data Quality Improvement, Kaufmann, M., Ed., Elsevier, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Varlamov, M.I. and Turdakov, D., A survey of methods for the extraction of information from web resources, Program. Comput. Software J., 2016, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Z., et al., Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals, Inf. Manag., 2004, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gartner. Survey: poor data quality most common business intelligence problem, 2009. http://searchdatamanagement.techtarget.com/.

  12. Yatskov, A.K., Varlamov, M.I., and Turdakov, D., Extraction of data from mass media web sites, Program. Comput. Software J., 2018, vol. 44, no. 5, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahdavi, M., Shepherd, J., and Benatallah, B., A collaborative approach for caching dynamic data in portal applications, Proc. 15th Conf. on Australian Database, Dunedin, 2004.

  14. Caro, A., et al., A proposal for a set of attributes relevant for web portal data quality, Software Qual. J., 2008, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 513–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorr, B. and Murname, R., Using data profiling, data quality, and data monitoring to improve enterprise information, in Software Quality Professional, American Society for Quality, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strong, D., Lee, Y., and Wang, R., Ten potholes in the road to information quality, IEEE Comput., 1997, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira, P., Rodrigues, F.T., and Henriques, P., A formal definition of data quality problems, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Information Quality (ICIQ’05), Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2005.

  18. Batini, C. and Scannapieco, M., Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Data-Centric Systems and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Caballero, I., et al., A data quality measurement information model based on ISO/IEC 15939, in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2007.

  20. Lee, Y.W., et al., Journey to Data Quality, Cambridge, MA: Massachussets Institute of Technology, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scannapieco, M., Pernici, B., and Pierce, E., IPUML: towards a methodology for quality improvement based on the IP-MAP framework, Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Quality, ICIQ-02, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

  22. Bizer, C. and Cyganiak, R., Quality-driven information filtering using the WIQA policy framework, Web Semant., 2009, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerra-García, C., Caballero, I., and Piattini, M., A survey on how to manage specific data quality requirements during information system development, Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., 2011, vol. 230, pp. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guerra-García, C., et al., Developing web applications with awareness of data quality elements – DQAWA, Program. Comput. Software J., 2020, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collins, H., Corporate Portal Definitions and Features, New York: Amacom Books, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moraga, M.A., et al., Assessment of portlet quality: collecting real experience, Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 2009, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lowe, D. and Eklund, J., Client needs and the design process in web projects, J. Web Eng., Rinton Press, 2002, vol. 1, no. 1.

  28. Nicolás, J. and Toval, A., On the generation of requirements specifications from software engineering models: a systematic literature review, Inf. Software Technol., 2009, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1291–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pressman, R., Software Engineering: a Practitioner’s Approach, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Caballero, I., et al., MMPRO: a methodology based on ISO/IEC 15939 to draw up data quality measurement processes, in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2008.

  31. Ballou, D.P., Wang, R.Y., and Pazer, H., Modelling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality, Manag. Sci., 1998, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 462–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, R.Y., A product perspective on total data quality management, Commun. ACM, 1998, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Loshin, D., Enterprises Knowledgement Management: the Data Quality Approach, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ge, M. and Helfert, M., A review of information quality research, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2007.

  35. Wang, R. and Strong, D., Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 1996, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ISO-25012, ISO/IEC 25012: Software Engineering-Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-Data Quality Model, 2008.

  37. Franch, X. and Carvallo, J.P., Using quality models in software package selection, IEEE Software, 2003, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, 78300, San Luis, S.L.P., Mexico

    C. Guerra-García, H. Pérez-González, M. Ramírez-Torres & L. Ontañón-García

  2. Autonomous University of Baja California, UABC, Parque Internacional Industrial Tijuana, 22424, Tijuana, B.C., Mexico

    Reyes Juárez-Ramírez

Authors
  1. C. Guerra-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Pérez-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ramírez-Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Ontañón-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reyes Juárez-Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to C. Guerra-García, H. Pérez-González, M. Ramírez-Torres, L. Ontañón-García or Reyes Juárez-Ramírez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerra-García, C., Pérez-González, H., Ramírez-Torres, M. et al. Specifying Data Quality Requirements through Web Functionalities – MOSQAF. Program Comput Soft 47, 631–653 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768821080132

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768821080132

Search

Navigation