Abstract
It was suggested in our previous paper [Yu.V. Dumin, Grav. Cosmol. 25, 169 (2019)] that the cosmological Dark Energy might be mediated by the time–energy uncertainty relation in the Mandelstam–Tamm form, which is appropriate for the long-term evolution of quantum systems. The amount of such Dark Energy gradually decays with time, and the corresponding scale factor of the Universe increases by a “quasi-exponential” law (namely, the exponent is proportional to of the square root of time) throughout the entire cosmological evolution. While such a universal behavior looks quite appealing, an important question arises: Does the quasi-exponential expansion resolve the major problems of the early Universe in the same way as the standard inflationary scenario? In the present paper, we elucidate this issue by analyzing the causal structure of the space–time following from this model. It is found that the observed region of the Universe (the past light cone) covers a single causally connected domain developing from the Planck times (the future light cone). Consequently, there should be no appreciable inhomogeneity and anisotropy in the early Universe, creation of the topological defects will be suppressed, etc. From this point of view, the uncertainty-mediated Dark Energy can serve as a reasonable alternative to the standard (exponential) inflationary scenario.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some qualitative conjectures about a possible role of the uncertainty relation for the explanation of Dark Energy were put forward by Coe in [4], but the quantitative analysis performed there looks absolutely unreasonable.
From the mathematical point of view, this differential equation is non-autonomous, i.e., involves the explicit dependence on time, which is quite an unusual situation in cosmology. However, as follows from the subsequent analysis, this fact does not result in any substantial peculiarities of the solution: it turns out to be well between the solutions of usual cosmological equations obtained under various assumptions.
We prefer to not call it the Big Bang, because in modern literature this term often refers to the onset of the “hot” stage, when ordinary matter becomes dominant.
In principle, our equations might be favorable for constructing a bounce-type model of the Universe, but we prefer not to speculate about processes at Planckian times.
REFERENCES
Yu. V. Dumin, “A unified model of Dark Energy based on the Mandelstam–Tamm uncertainty relation,” Grav. Cosmol. 25, 169 (2019).
L. I. Mandelstam and I. E. Tamm, “The energy–time uncertainty relation in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Ser. Fiz.) 9, 122 (1945), in Russian.
S. Deffner and S. Campbell, “Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 453001 (2017).
A. Coe, “Observable Universe topology and Heisenberg uncertainty principle,” Preprint viXra: 1710.0143.
K. A. Olive and J. A. Peacock, “Big-Bang cosmology,” in: C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40, 355 (2016).
M. J. Mortonson, D. H. Weinberg, and M. White, “Dark Energy,” in: C. Patrignani, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40, 402 (2016).
J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, “Encyclopaedia inflationaris,” Phys. Dark Universe 5-6, 75 (2014).
J. Ellis and D. Wands, “Inflation,” in: C. Patrignani, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40, 367 (2016).
A. H. Guth, “The inflationary Universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
A. D. Linde, “The inflationary Universe,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 925 (1984).
A. A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).
A. D. Sakharov, “Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of gravitation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 177, 70 (1967), in Russian.
C. W. Misner, “Mixmaster Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1071 (1969).
N. N. Bogoliubov, “Field-theoretical methods in physics,” Suppl. Nuovo Cimento (Ser. prima) 4, 346 (1966).
Ia. B. Zeldovich, I. Yu. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, “Cosmological consequences of a spontaneous breakdown of a discrete symmetry,” Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 1 (1975).
T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976).
W. H. Zurek, “Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?” Nature 317, 505 (1985).
H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and K. Zuber, Particle Astrophysics (Inst. Phys. Publ., Bristol, 1997).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am grateful to A. Starobinsky, J.-P. Uzan, C. Wetterich, C. Kiefer and the members of his group for valuable discussions and critical comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumin, Y.V. Cosmological Inflation Based on the Uncertainty-Mediated Dark Energy. Gravit. Cosmol. 26, 259–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289320030068
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289320030068