Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Seasonal Variations and Impact Assessment of COVID-19 Lockdown on Water Quality Status of Hindon River, Ghaziabad

  • HYDROCHEMISTRY, HYDROBIOLOGY: ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ascertained as a global pandemic that hit most countries during the first quarter (FQ) of 2020, and lockdown (LKD) has been enforced at different levels to cope with the situation, and most of the industrial and commercial activities were halted during this period. Hence, the present study has been introduced to assess the impact of the COVID-19 LKD coupled with seasonal variations (SVs) on the water quality status of the Hindon River (HR), Ghaziabad (GZB). The report includes secondary data analysis of different water quality parameters (WQPs), viz., dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), fecal coliform (FC), and total coliform (TC). BOD and DO are the preliminary indicators of organic load, and analysis of FC and TC determines the overall pathogen load in water bodies. The effect of seasonal variations, i.e., pre-monsoon (PRM), monsoon (MS), and post-monsoon (POM) at sampling locations designated by the monitoring body at HR (GZB stretch), viz., Mohan Nagar road bridge (MNRB), Karheda village (KV), and Chijarsi bridge (CB) was investigated for 2019 to 2021. DO level was comparatively higher during 2020 at sampling stations (SLSs) MNRB and KV. BOD reductions were ~17–40% during the LKD phase at SLSs KV and CB compared to PRD and PLD. The SVs significantly influence the DO and BOD at all the SLSs. The water samples during the PRM of 2020 showed lower BOD levels compared to 2019 and 2021 at all the SLSs. FC/TC ratio was highest at the LKD phase at all the SLSs. The coliform load was greater at SLS CB than at MNRB and KV. A strong positive correlation was obtained between TC-BOD and FC-BOD at the LKD phase during all the SVs. Based on the WQPs analysis, CB was found to be the most contaminated sampling location. Despite higher coliform loads, the LKD phase experienced overall improvements in DO and BOD levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, S. and Khurshid, S., Hydrogeochemical assessment of groundwater quality in parts of the Hindon River basin, Ghaziabad, India: implications for domestic and irrigation purposes, SN Appl. Sci., 2019, vol. 1, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0161-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed, F., Islam, M.A., Kumar, M., Hossain, M., Bhattacharya, P., Islam, M.T., Hossen, F., Hos-sain, M.S., Islam, M.S., Uddin, M.M., and Islam, M.N., First detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in the vicinity of COVID-19 isolation Centre in Bangladesh: Variation along the sewer network. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, vol. 776, p. 145724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alahdal, H.M., Ameen, F., Al Yahya, S., et al., Municipal wastewater viral pollution in Saudi Arabia: effect of hot climate on COVID-19 disease spreading. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2021, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14809-2

  4. Aman, M.A., Salman, M.S., and Yunus, A.P., COVID-19 and its impact on environment: Improved pollution levels during the lockdown period-A case from Ahmedabad, India, Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2020, vol. 20, p. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen, K.G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W.I., et al., The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2, Nat. Med., 2020, vol. 26, pp. 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora, S., Nag, A., Sethi, J., et al., Sewage surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genome as a useful wastewater based epidemiology (WBE) tracking tool in India, Water Sci. Technol., 2020, vol. 82, pp. 2823–2836. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bajpai, P., Environmental Impact, in Biermann’s Handbook of Pulp and Paper, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814238-7.00015-5

  8. Baldasano, J.M., COVID-19 lockdown effects on air quality by NO2 in the cities of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain), Sci. Total Environ., 2020, vol. 741, p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandala, E.R., Kruger, B.R., Cesarino, I., et al., Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the wastewater pathway into surface water: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, vol. 774, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Batabyal, A.K. and Chakraborty, S., Hydrogeochemistry and water quality index in the assessment of groundwater quality for drinking uses, Water Environ. Res., 2015, vol. 87, pp. 607–617. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14212658613956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bendicho, C., and Lavilla, I., Sewage, in Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering, Elsevier, 2019, p. B9780124095472116000. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.11519-7

  12. Bhowmick, G.D., Dhar, D., Nath, D., et. al., Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: some serious consequences with urban and rural water cycle, npj Clean Water, 2020, vol. 8, p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-0079-1

  13. Biswas, S.P., Restoration of riverine health: an ecohydrological approach-flow regimes and aquatic biodiversity, in Handbook of Ecological and Ecosystem Engineering, Eds. Prasad, M.N.V., Wiley, 2021, pp. 261–278, 1st edn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678595.ch14

  14. Bora, M. and Goswami, D.C., Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index (WQI): case study of the Kolong River, Assam, India, Appl. Water Sci., 2017, vol. 7, pp. 3125–3135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0451-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chakraborty, B., Roy, S., Bera, A., et al., Cleaning the River Damodar (India): impact of COVID-19 lockdown on water quality and future rejuvenation strategies, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2021, vol. 23, pp. 11975–11989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01152-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Corman, V.M., Muth, D., Niemeyer, D., and Drosten, C., Hosts and sources of endemic human coronaviruses, Adv. Vir. Res., 2018, vol. 100, pp. 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eden, R., Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and E. coli: classical and modern methods for detection and enumeration, in Encyclopedia Food Microbiol., Elsevier, 2014, pp 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00097-5

  18. Elsamadony, M., Fujii, M., Miura, T., and Watanabe, T., Possible transmission of viruses from contaminated human feces and sewage: Implications for SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Tot. Environ., 2021, vol. 755, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ewaid, S.H. and Abed, S.A., Water quality index for Al-Gharraf River, Southern Iraq, Egypt. J. Aquat. Res., 2017, vol. 43, pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2017.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foladori, P., Cutrupi, F., Segata, N., et al., SARS-CoV-2 from faeces to wastewater treatment: What do we know? A review, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2020, vol. 743, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. García-Ávila, F., Valdiviezo-Gonzales, L, Cadme-Galabay, M., et al., Considerations on water quality and the use of chlorine in times of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in the community, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., 2020, vol. 2:100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerba, C.P. and Pepper, I.L., Municipal Wastewater Treatment, in Environmental Microbiology, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394626-3.00025-9

  23. Ghildyal, D., Statistical Analysis of Coliforms and BOD Levels in Hindon River at Meerut: A Pilot Study, Int J. lakes Rivers, 2018, vol. 11, pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gu, J., Han, B., and Wang, J., COVID-19: Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Potential Fecal–Oral Transmission, Gastroentero., 2020, vol. 158, pp. 1518–1519. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. http://117.252.14.242/rbis/india_information/statetotalwaterrequirements.htm. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  26. https://covid19.who.int. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  27. https://mapchart.net.

  28. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  29. https://www.worldweatheronline.com/lang/en-in/ghaziabad-weather-averages/uttar-pradesh/in.aspx. Ghaziabad Monthly Climate Averages. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  30. Izzotti, A., Fracchia, E., Au, W., et al., Prevention of Covid-19 infection and related complications by ozonized oils, J. Pers. Med., 2021, vol. 11, p. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11030226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan, R., Saxena, A., Shukla, S., et al., Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on the water quality index of River Gomti, India, with potential hazard of fecal-oral transmission, Environ Sci. Pollut. Res., 2021, vol. 28, pp. 33021–33029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13096-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kothari, V., Vij, S., Sharma, S., and Gupta, N., Correlation of various water quality parameters and water quality index of districts of Uttarakhand, Environ. Sustain. Indic., 2021, vol. 9, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar, M., Joshi M, Patel, A.K., Joshi, C.G., Unravelling the early warning capability of wastewater surveillance for COVID-19: A temporal study on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and need for the escalation, Environ. Res., 2021, vol. 196, p. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lahrich, S., Laghrib, F., Farahi, A., et al., Review on the contamination of wastewater by COVID-19 virus: Impact and treatment, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, vol. 751, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, M., Yang, Y., Lu, Y., et al., Natural host–environmental media-human: a new potential pathway of COVID-19 outbreak, Engineering, 2020, vol. 6, pp. 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mandal, P., Gupta, A.K., and Dubey, B.K., A review on presence, survival, disinfection/removal methods of coronavirus in wastewater and progress of wastewater-based epidemiology, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, vol. 8, p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Siour, G., et al., Impact of lockdown measures to combat Covid-19 on air quality over Western Europe, Sci. Tot. Env., 2020, vol. 741, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mondal, I., Bandyopadhyay, J., and Paul, A.K., (2016), Water quality modeling for seasonal fluctuation of Ichamati River, West Bengal, India, Model Earth Syst Environ., 2016, vol. 2, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0153-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mtaita, T.A., Food, in Field Guide to Appropriate Technology. Elsevier, 2003, pp. 277–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012335185-2/50047-4

  40. Naddeo, V. and Liu, H., Editorial Perspectives: 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): what is its fate in urban water cycle and how can the water research community respond? Environ. Sci: Water Res. Technol., 2020, vol. 6, pp. 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW90015J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakada, L.Y.K. and Urban, R.C., COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state, Brazil. Sci. Tot. Env., 2020, vol. 730, p. 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nasseri, S., Yavarian, J., Baghani, A.N., et al., The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater in 3 cities of Iran: Tehran, Qom and Anzali during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, J. Environ. Health Sci. Engineer., 2021, vol. 19, pp. 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00629-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pandey, A., Joshi, V.K., Nigam, P., and Soccol, C.R., Enterobacteriaceae, Coliforms and E. coli: Introduction, in Encyclopedia Food Microbiol., Elsevier, 1999, pp. 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1006/rwfm.1999.0510

  44. Patel, A.K., Singhania, R.R., Pandey, A., et al., Enterobacteriaceae, Coliforms and E. coli: Introduction, in Encyclopedia Food Microbiol., Elsevier, 2014, pp 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00096-3

  45. Patel, H. and Vashi, R.T., Characterization of Textile Wastewater, in Characterization and Treatment of Textile Wastewater, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 21–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802326-6.00002-2

  46. Pepper, I.L., Gerba, C.P., and Brusseau, M.L., Environmental and Pollution Science, Academic Press, San Diego, CA., 2006, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ratner, B., The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? J. Target Meas. Anal. Mark, 2009, vol. 17, pp. 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Saikrishna, K., Purushotham, D., Sunitha, V., et al., Data for the evaluation of groundwater quality using water quality index and regression analysis in parts of Nalgonda district, Telangana, Southern India, Data in Brief, 2020, vol. 32, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shah, K.A. and Joshi, G.S., Evaluation of water quality index for River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India. Appl Water Sci., 2017, vol. 7, pp. 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0318-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sheldon, F., Leigh, C., Neilan, W., et al., Urbanization, in: Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00011-3

  51. Shi, K.-W., Huang, Y.-H., Quon, H., et al., Quantifying the risk of indoor drainage system in multi-unit apartment building as a transmission route of SARS-CoV-2, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, vol. 762, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Soni, P., Effects of COVID-19 lockdown phases in India: an atmospheric perspective, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2021, vol. 23, pp. 12044–12055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01156-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Storm, K., Introduction to construction statistics using Excel, in Industrial Process Plant Construction Estimating and Man-Hour Analysis, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818648-0.00001-6

  54. Tang, X., Wu, C., Li, X., et al., On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2, Nat. Sci. Rev., 2020, vol. 7, pp. 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thakur, A.K., Ramanathan, A.L., Bhattacharya, P., and Kumar, M., Wastewater discharge and surface water contamination pre- and post-COVID 19-global case studies, in Environmental Resilience and Transformation in Times of COVID-19, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-02703-9

  56. Trick, J.K., Stuart, M., and Reeder, S., Contaminated groundwater sampling and quality control of water analyses, in Environmental Geochemistry: Site Characterization, Data Analysis and Case Histories, Elsevier, 2018, pp 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63763-5.00004-5

  57. Tripathi, B., Pandey, R., Raghuvanshi, D., Singh, H., Pandey, V., and Shukla, D.N., Studies on the physico-chemical parameters and correlation coefficient of the River Ganga at Holy Place Shringverpur, Allahabad, J. Env. Sci. Toxico. Food Technol., 2014, vol. 8, pp. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-081012936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. UPPCB (Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board) (2019) Action plan for restoration of polluted stretch of River Hindon from district Saharanpur to district Ghaziabad. http://www.uppcb.com/pdf/PRIORITY-I/ RIVER-HINDON-5july19.pdf. Accessed Decem-ber 27, 2022.

  59. WHO (2019) https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  60. WHO & UNICEF (World Health Orga-nization & United Nations Children’s Fund), Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19: technical brief, 03 March 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331305. Accessed December 27, 2022.

  61. Xiao, F., Tang, M., Zheng, X., et al., Evidence for Gastrointestinal Infection of SARS-CoV-2, Gastroenterology, 2020, vol. 158, pp. 1831–1833.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yunus, A.P., Masago, Y., and Hijioka, Y., COVID-19 and surface water quality: Improved lake water quality during the lockdown, Sci. Tot. Env., 2020, vol. 731, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Data acquisition has been done through web portals. The authors acknowledge UPPCB, CPCB, Worldometers, and Worldweatheronline for making these data avaialble.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Singh.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, N., Kumar, A. & Singh, N. Effect of Seasonal Variations and Impact Assessment of COVID-19 Lockdown on Water Quality Status of Hindon River, Ghaziabad. Water Resour 50, 986–1002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807823600018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807823600018

Keywords:

Navigation