Skip to main content
Log in

The Innovative Combination of Time Series Analysis Methods for the Forecasting of Groundwater Fluctuations

  • WATER RESOURCES AND THE REGIME OF WATER BODIES
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater fluctuations forecasting is a valuable tool for the intelligent management of groundwater resources that prevents additional costs to the system. In this research, time series analysis methods, including Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing (HWES), were used for developing a short-term model and the forecasting of the groundwater fluctuations in six piezometer wells around the Gohar Zamin Iron Ore Mine. To take advantage of all the features of the robustly developed ARIMA and HWES models, the innovative combination of these methods with specific weights was used to predict groundwater levels. The results of Diebold and Mariano’s test were applied for the innovative combination of the developed models in six piezometers, and well no. 2 with a p-value higher than 5% was selected due to stable environmental conditions and was analyzed and interpreted. For this purpose, 250 non-seasonal data of daily groundwater level were used, of which 200 data are for modeling, and 50 data are for water level forecasting. The research results show that among all the forecasting, the least-squares method in the innovation of combining models has the highest accuracy for forecasting the groundwater fluctuations in the short term. All the forecasts in this period time show a decrease in the groundwater level, indicating the effects of pumping wells in the Gohar Zamin Iron Ore Mine area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Akaike, H., Factor analysis and AIC, Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer, 1987, pp. 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Day, H., Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, 1976. https://books.google.com/books?id=1WVHAAAAMAAJ

  3. Chong, Y.Y. and Hendry, D.F., Econometric Evaluation of Linear Macro-Economic Models, The Rev. Econ. Studies, 1986, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 671–690. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clemen, R.T., Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography, Int. J. Forecast., 1989, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070 (89)90012-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cleveland, W.S., Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1979, vol. 74, no. 368, pp. 829–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curtis, Z.K., Li, S.-G., Liao, H.-S., and Lusch, D., Data-driven approach for analyzing hydrogeology and groundwater quality across multiple scales, Groundwater, 2018, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S., Comparing predictive accuracy, J. Business Econ. Stat., 2002, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobrovol’skii, S.G., Year-to-year and many-year river runoff variations in Baikal drainage basin, Water Resour., 2017, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807817030083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elganainy, M.A. and Eldwer, A.E., Stochastic forecasting models of the monthly streamflow for the Blue Nile at Eldiem Station, Water Resour., 2018, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807818030041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elganiny, M.A. and Eldwer, A.E., Enhancing the forecasting of monthly streamflow in the main key stations of the River Nile Basin, Water Resour., 2018, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807818050135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gideon, S., Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics, 1978, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guanhua, Z., Ding, W., Liu, H., Yi, L., Lei, X., and Zhang, O., Quantifying climatic and anthropogenic influences on water discharge and sediment load in Xiangxi River basin of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, Water Resour., 2021, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807821020184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, T., Song, S., Shi, J., and Li, J., Groundwater depth forecasting using configurational entropy spectral analyses with the optimal input, Groundwater, 2020, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12968

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hannan, E.J. and Quinn, B.G., The determination of the order of an autoregression, J. Royal Stat. Soc.: Series B (Methodol.), 1979, vol. 41, no. 2, pp, 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161. 1979.tb01072.x

  15. Holt, C.C., Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages, Int. J. Forecasting, 2004, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Makridakis, S. and Hibon, M., The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications, Int. J. Forecasting, 2000, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nogueira, G.E.H., Schmidt, C., Trauth, N., and Fleckenstein, J.H., Seasonal and short-term controls of riparian oxygen dynamics and the implications for redox processes, Hydrol. Processes, 2021, vol. 35, no. 2, e14055. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan, J., Shangguan, W., Li, L., Yuan, H., Zhang, S., Lu, X., Wei, N., and Dai, Y., Using data-driven methods to explore the predictability of surface soil moisture with FLUXNET site data, Hydrol. Processes, 2019, vol. 33, no. 23, 2978–2996. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W., Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors, J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 2002, vol. 97, no. 460, pp. 1167–1179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3085839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Timmermann, A., Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations, in Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Elliott, G., Granger, C.W.J., and Timmermann, Eds., Elsevier, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 135–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01004-9

  21. Yu, X., Zhang, X., and Qin, H., A data-driven model based on Fourier transform and support vector regression for monthly reservoir inflow forecasting, J. Hydro-Environ. Res., 2018, vol. 18, pp. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Najafabadipour.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najafabadipour, A., Kamali, G. & Nezamabadi-pour, H. The Innovative Combination of Time Series Analysis Methods for the Forecasting of Groundwater Fluctuations. Water Resour 49, 283–291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807822020026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807822020026

Keywords:

Navigation