Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical modeling of flow in riverine basins using an improved dynamic roughness coefficient

  • Hydrophysical Processes
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various parameters such as bed and bank materials, shape and irregularity of the section, vegetation, river meanders, plan of the river path etc. affect the flow hydraulic resistance. In open channel hydraulics the effects of all these parameters are generally considered as the roughness coefficient. The Manning’s equation is one of the most practical equations to flow resistance analysis, in which the surface roughness is defined by Manning coefficient. Since many parameters are effective on the value of this coefficient, in this research study it was tried to define the roughness coefficient somehow that it be able to dynamically change with different river and hydraulic conditions. The collected data in Karun River (Iran) for two periods were used as the case study. It is shown that the accuracy of model predictions for water surface elevations were improved more than 13% in error estimation in comparison with the corresponding results obtained for a constant roughness coefficient. The roughness coefficient (n) for Karun River was also estimated using the empirical method proposed by Cowan for two different dry and wet periods. These values were then successfully compared with the average corresponding roughness coefficients calculated by the numerical model for those periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldridge, B.N. and Garrett, J.M., Roughness Coefficients for Stream Channels in Arizona, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1973, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, B.G., On the impact of riparian vegetation on catchment scale flooding characteristics, PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arcement, G.J. and Schneider, V.R., Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plain, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes, H.H., Jr., Roughness characteristics of natural channels, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1849, Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1967, p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, M.A. and Dalrymple, Tate, general field and office procedures for indirect discharge measurements, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 3, chap. Al, 1967, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C.I., Flow resistance in broad shallow grassed channels, J. Hydraul. Div., ASCE, 1976, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chow, V.T., Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1959, pp. 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cowan, W.L., Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients, Agric. Engin., 1956, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cunge, J.A., Holly, F.M., and Verwey, A., Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics, London: Pitman Publishing Limited, 1980, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ding, Y., Jia, Y., and Wang, S. S. Y., Identification of Manning’s roughness coefficient in shallow water flow, J. Hydraul. Engin., ASCE, 2004, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fathi-Moghadam, M. and Kouwen, N., Nonrigid, nonsubmerged, vegetative roughness on floodplains, J. Hydraul. Engin., ASCE, 1997, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fathi-Moghadam, M., Kashefipour, M., Ebrahimi, N., and Emamgholizadeh, N., Physical and numerical modeling of submerged vegetation roughness in rivers and flood plains, J. Hydraul. Engin., ASCE, 2011, vol. 16, no.11, pp. 858–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, K.R., Handbook for assessment of hydraulic performance of environmental channels, Wallingford, Great Britain. HR Wallingford, 1996, Report SR 490, p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joranova, A.A., Birkhead, A.L., James, C.S., and Kleynhans, C.J., Hydraulics for determination of the ecological reserve for rivers, WRC Report no. 1174, Pretoria, South Africa, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kashefipour, S.M., Modeling flow, water quality and sediment transport processes in riverine basins, PhD Thesis, Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2002, p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khatua, K.K., Patra, K.C., and Nayak, P., Meandering effect for evaluating of roughness coefficients in open channel flow, Dep. Civil. Eng. Conf. on Advanced in Fluid Mechanics, India, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kouwen, N. and Fathi-Moghadam, M., Friction factors for coniferous trees along rivers, J. Hydraul. Engin., ASCE, 2000, vol. 126, no. 10, pp. 732–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Limerinos, J.T., Determination of the manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1898-B, Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1970, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siavash Mohammadi.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, S., Kashefipour, S.M. Numerical modeling of flow in riverine basins using an improved dynamic roughness coefficient. Water Resour 41, 412–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814040149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814040149

Keywords

Navigation