Skip to main content
Log in

On the problem of maximizing the transition probability in an n-level quantum system using nonselective measurements

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of maximizing the probability of transition from a given initial state to a given final state for an n-level quantum system using nonselective quantum measurements. We find an estimate from below for the maximum of the transition probability for any fixed number of measurements and find the measured observables on which this estimate is attained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. S. Blok, C. Bonato, M. L. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, “Manipulating a qubit through the backaction of sequential partial measurements and real-time feedback, ” Nat. Phys. 10, 189–193 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Campisi, P. Talkner, and P. Hänggi, “Influence of measurements on the statistics of work performed on a quantum system, ” Phys. Rev. E 83 (4), 041114 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Dominy, G. A. Paz-Silva, A. T. Rezakhani, and D. A. Lidar, “Analysis of the quantum Zeno effect for quantum control and computation, ” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (7), 075306 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Fu, G. Shi, A. Proutiere, and M. R. James, “Feedback policies for measurement-based quantum state manipulation, ” Phys. Rev. A 90 (6), 062328 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Hentschel and B. C. Sanders, “Machine learning for precise quantum measurement, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (6), 063603 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Kakuyanagi, T. Baba, Y. Matsuzaki, H. Nakano, S. Saito, and K. Semba, “Observation of quantum Zeno effect in a superconducting flux qubit, ” New J. Phys. 17 (6), 063035 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Lucas and K. Hornberger, “Incoherent control of the retinal isomerization in rhodopsin, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (5), 058301 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. A. Paz-Silva, A. T. Rezakhani, J. M. Dominy, and D. A. Lidar, “Zeno effect for quantum computation and control, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (8), 080501 (2012).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. N. Pechen and N. B. Il’in, “Coherent control of a qubit is trap-free, ” Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Ross. Akad. Nauk 285, 244–252 (2014) [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 285, 233–240 (2014)].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Pechen and N. B. Il’in, “Existence of traps in the problem of maximizing quantum observable averages for a qubit at short times, ” Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Ross. Akad. Nauk 289, 227–234 (2015) [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 289, 213–220 (2015)].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Pechen and N. B. Il’in, “On critical points of the objective functional for maximization of qubit observables, ” Usp. Mat. Nauk 70 (4), 211–212 (2015) [Russ. Math. Surv. 70, 782–784 (2015)].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pechen, N. Il’in, F. Shuang, and H. Rabitz, “Quantum control by von Neumann measurements, ” Phys. Rev. A 74 (5), 052102 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Pechen and A. Trushechkin, “Measurement-assisted Landau–Zener transitions, ” Phys. Rev. A 91 (5), 052316 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. K. Pedersen, J. J. W. H. Sørensen, M. C. Tichy, and J. F. Sherson, “Many-body state engineering using measurements and fixed unitary dynamics, ” New J. Phys. 16 (11), 113038 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Shuang, A. Pechen, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, “Observation-assisted optimal control of quantum dynamics, ” J. Chem. Phys. 126 (13), 134303 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Shuang, M. Zhou, A. Pechen, R. Wu, O. M. Shir, and H. Rabitz, “Control of quantum dynamics by optimized measurements, ” Phys. Rev. A 78 (6), 063422 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. S. Trushechkin and I. V. Volovich, “Perturbative treatment of inter-site couplings in the local description of open quantum networks, ” Europhys. Lett. 113 (3), 30005 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. W. Wiseman, “Quantum control: Squinting at quantum systems, ” Nature 470, 178–179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander N. Pechen.

Additional information

Published in Russian in Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A. Steklova, 2016, Vol. 294, pp. 248–255.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pechen, A.N., Il’in, N.B. On the problem of maximizing the transition probability in an n-level quantum system using nonselective measurements. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 294, 233–240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543816060158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543816060158

Navigation