Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the Hausdorff distance between sets in Euclidean space

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Set approximation problems play an important role in many areas of mathematics and mechanics. For example, approximation problems for solvability sets and reachable sets of control systems are intensively studied in differential game theory and optimal control theory. In N.N. Krasovskii and A.I. Subbotin’s investigations devoted to positional differential games, one of the key problems was the problem of identification of solvability sets, which are maximal stable bridges. Since this problem can be solved exactly in rare cases only, the question of the approximate calculation of solvability sets arises. In papers by A.B. Kurzhanskii and F.L. Chernous’ko and their colleagues, reachable sets were approximated by ellipsoids and parallelepipeds.

In the present paper, we consider problems in which it is required to approximate a given set by arbitrary polytopes. Two sets, polytopes A and B, are given in Euclidean space. It is required to find a position of the polytopes that provides a minimum Hausdorff distance between them. Though the statement of the problem is geometric, methods of convex and nonsmooth analysis are used for its investigation.

One of the approaches to dealing with planar sets in control theory is their approximation by families of disks of equal radii. A basic component of constructing such families is best n-nets and their generalizations, which were described, in particular, by A.L. Garkavi. The authors designed an algorithm for constructing best nets based on decomposing a given set into subsets and calculating their Chebyshev centers. Qualitative estimates for the deviation of sets from their best n-nets as n grows to infinity were given in the general case by A.N. Kolmogorov. We derive a numerical estimate for the Hausdorff deviation of one class of sets. Examples of constructing best n-nets are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. N. Krasovskii and A. I. Subbotin, Positional Differential Games (Nauka, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. B. Kurzhanskii and T. F. Filippova, “Description of a set of viable trajectories of a differential inclusion,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 289 (1), 38–41 (1986).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. B. Kurzhanski and T. F. Filippova, “On the theory of trajectory tubes — a mathematical formalism for uncertain dynamics, viability and control,” in Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics and Control: A Report from Russia, Ed. by A. B. Kurzhanski (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993), Ser. Progress in Systems and Control Theory, Vol. 17, pp. 122–188.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. B. Kurzhanski and I. Valyi, Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation and Control (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1997).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F. L. Chernous’ko, Estimation of the Phase State of Dynamical Systems (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. F. L. Chernous’ko, “Ellipsoidal estimates of a controlled system’s attainability domain,” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 45 (1), 7–12 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. F. L. Chernousko and A. I. Ovseevich, “Properties of the optimal ellipsoids approximating the reachable sets of uncertain systems,” J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. 120 (2), 223–246 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. V. N. Ushakov, A. R. Matviichuk, and P. D. Lebedev, “Stability defect in a game problem of approach at a fixed time,” Vestn. Udmurt. Univ., Ser. Mat. Mekh. Komp. Nauki, No. 3, 87–103 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. N. Ushakov, P. D. Lebedev, A. R. Matviychuk, and A. G. Malev, “Differential games with fixed terminal time and estimation of the instability degree of sets in these games,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 277, 266–277 (2012).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Hausdorff, Set Theory (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1957; Komkniga, Moscow, 2006).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Lakhtin and V. N. Ushakov, “The problem of minimization of the Hausdorff distance between two convex polyhedra,” Sovrem. Mat. Prilozh. 9, 60–67 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. S. Lakhtin and V. N. Ushakov, “Minimization of Hausdorff distance between convex polyhedrons,” J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 126 (6), 1553–1560 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis (Princeton Univ., Princeton, 1970; Moscow, Mir, 1973).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Sukharev, A. V. Timokhov, and V. V. Fedorov, A Course in Optimization Methods (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Z. Shor, Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions and Applications (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1979; Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. B. T. Polyak, Introduction to Optimization (Nauka, Moscow, 1983; Optimization Software, New York, 1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. P. D. Lebedev and A. V. Ushakov, “Approximating sets on a plane with optimal sets of circles,” Autom. Remote Control 73 (3), 485–493 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. D. Lebedev and D. S. Bukharov, “Approximation of polyhedra by optimal sets of disks,” Izv. Irkutsk. Gos. Univ., Ser. Mat., No. 3, 72–87 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. D. Lebedev, A. A. Uspenskii, and V. N. Ushakov, “Algorithms for best approximation of sets on a plane by sets of disks,” Vestn. Udmurt. Univ., Ser. Mat. Mekh. Komp. Nauki, No. 4, 88–99 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. L. Garkavi, “Existence of the best net and the best width for a set in a Banach space,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 15 (2), 210–211 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. L. Garkavi, “On the optimal net and best cross-section of a set in a normed space,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 26 (1), 87–106 (1962).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. A. L. Garkavi, “On the Chebyshev center and convex hull of a set,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 19 (6), 139–145 (1964).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. E. N. Sosov, “The metric space of all N-nets in a geodesic space,” Uchen. Zap. Kazansk. Gos. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk 15 (4), 136–149 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. N. Kolmogorov, “On certain asymptotic characteristics of completely bounded metric spaces,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 108 (3), 385–388 (1956).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. N. Kolmogorov and V. M. Tikhomirov, “The e-entropy and e-capacity of sets in function spaces,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, No. 2 (86), 3–86 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Leichtweiss, Konvexe Mengen (Springer, Berlin, 1980; Nauka, Moscow, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. S. A. Piyavskii, “On the optimization of nets,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekhn. Kibernet., No. 1, 68–80 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. S. Brusov and S. L. Piyavskii, “A computational algorithm for optimally covering a plane region,” USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 11 (2), 17–27 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F. Preparata and M. Shamos, Computational Geometry (Springer, New York, 1985; Mir, Moscow, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Sh. I. Galiev and M. A. Karpova, “Optimization of multiple covering of a bounded set with circles,” Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 50 (4), 721–732 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Erich’s Packing Center. http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/packing.html

  32. I. V. Bychkov, N. N. Maksimkin, I. S. Khozyainov, and L. V. Kiselev, “On the problem of patrolling the boundary of a water zone guarded by a group of underwater vehicles,” in Technical Problems of Exploring the Global Ocean: Proceedings of the Fifth All-Russia Research and Technology Conference, Vladivostok, Russia, 2013 (IPMT, Vladivostok, 2013), pp. 424–429.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. N. Stepanov, Spherical Trigonometry (OGIZ, Moscow, 1948) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. L. Kazakov and A. A. Lempert, “An approach to optimization in transport logistics,” Autom. Remote Control 72 (7), 1398–1404 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. A. L. Kazakov, A. A. Lempert, and D. S. Bukharov, “On segmenting logistical zones for servicing continuously developed consumers,” Autom. Remote Control 74 (6), 968–977 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. A. A. Lempert, A. L. Kazakov, and D. S. Bukharov, “A mathematical model and a software system for a problem of logistic object arrangement,” Upravl. Bol’shimi Sist., No. 41, 270–284 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Ushakov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.N. Ushakov, A.S. Lakhtin, P.D. Lebedev, 2014, published in Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN, 2014, Vol. 20, No. 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ushakov, V.N., Lakhtin, A.S. & Lebedev, P.D. Optimization of the Hausdorff distance between sets in Euclidean space. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 291 (Suppl 1), 222–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543815090151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543815090151

Keywords

Navigation