Skip to main content
Log in

Lower bounds for the number of hyperplanes separating two finite sets of points

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the NP-hard problem of polyhedral separability of two finite sets A and B of points in general position in ℝd by the minimum number of hyperplanes in the sense of a boolean function from a given class Σ. Both deterministic and probabilistic lower bounds are obtained for this number for two different classes of functions Σ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Agarwal and S. Suri, “Surface approximation and geometric partitions,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Arlington, USA, 1994 (ACM, New York, 1994), pp. 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Aronov and S. Har-Peled, “On approximating the depth and related problems,” SIAM J. Comput. 38(3), 899–921 (2008).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Aurenhammer, “Power diagrams: Properties, algorithms, and applications,” SIAM J. Comput. 16(1), 78–96 (1987).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Barany, “A note on Sylvester’s four-point problem,” Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 38(1), 73–77 (2001).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Barany, “Sylvester’s question: the probability that n points are in convex position,” Ann. Probab. 27(4), 2020–2034 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Barany, “Random points, convex bodies, lattices,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, China, 2002 (Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2002), Vol. 3, pp. 527–536.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Chlebus and S. H. Nguyen, “On finding optimal discretizations for two attributes,” in Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing: Proceedings of the First International Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 1998 (Springer, Berlin, 1998), Ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1424, pp. 537–544.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Dumitrescu and J. Pach, “Partitioning colored point sets into monochromatic parts,” on Algorithms and Data Structures: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop, Providence, USA, 2001 (Springer, Berlin, 2001), Ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2125, pp. 264–275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Edelsbrunner, Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Fischer, “Sequential and parallel algorithms for finding a maximum convex polygon,” Comput. Geom. 7(3), 187–200 (1997).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Hoeffding, “Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(301), 13–30 (1963).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. E. Houle, “Algorithms for weak and wide separation of sets,” Discrete Appl. Math. 45(2), 139–159 (1993).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Yu. Khachay, “Approximate algorithm for minimal committee of a system of linear inequalities,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 13(3), 459–464 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Yu. Khachay and M. I. Poberii, “Complexity and approximability of committee polyhedral separability of sets in general position,” Informatica 20(2), 217–234 (2009).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. K. S. Kobylkin, “Necessary condition for committee existence,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 12(1), 26–31 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Matousek, Geometric Discrepancy: An Illustrated Guide (Springer, Berlin, 1999), Ser. Algorithms and Combinatorics, Vol. 18.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Megiddo, “On the complexity of polyhedral separability,” Discrete Comput. Geom. 3(4), 325–337 (1988).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Mitchell and S. Suri, “Separation and approximation of polyhedral surfaces,” Comput. Geom. 5(2), 95–114 (1995).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Alon and J. Spencer, The Probabilistic Method (Wiley, New York, 2004; Binom, Moscow, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Gale, “Neighboring vertices on a convex polyhedron,” in Linear Inequalities and Related Systems, Ed. by H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956), pp. 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. A. Emelichev, M. M. Kovalev, and M. K. Kravtsov, Polytopes, Graphs and Optimization (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1984; Nauka, Moscow, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vl. D. Mazurov and M. Yu. Khachai, “Committee constructions,” Izv. Ural. Gos. Univ., No. 2, 77–108 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vl. D. Mazurov and M. Yu. Khachai, “Boosting and the polynomial approximability of the problem on a minimum affine separating committee,” Trudy Inst. Mat. Mekh. UrO RAN 19(2), 231–236 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. A. Matsenov, “Committee boosting: Minimization of the number of basic algorithms under simple voting,” in Mathematical Methods of Pattern Recognition: Proceedings of the All-Russia Conference, Kazan, Russia, 2013 (Maks, Moscow, 2007), pp. 180–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Kobylkin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.S. Kobylkin, 2014, published in Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN, 2014, Vol. 20, No. 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobylkin, K.S. Lower bounds for the number of hyperplanes separating two finite sets of points. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 289 (Suppl 1), 126–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543815050119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543815050119

Keywords

Navigation