Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of Operating Conditions for Ultrafiltration Units

  • WATER TREATMENT AND WATER CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parameters affecting the effectiveness of cleaning ultrafiltration membranes are considered. A simple hydraulic model of the backwashing regime is proposed. The formulas obtained for calculating the backwashing time enabled optimization of this process. Results are presented of studying the operating condition in ultrafiltration units. To effectively select the regimes of filtration and of direct and backwashing, the authors propose to employ laboratory ultrafiltration modules and the calculation procedure developed by them. A hydraulic model of the backwashing process and a phenomenological model of deposit formation within the fiber are illustrated. The formulas are presented for calculating backwash time, which can help us to optimize the backwashing process and reduce the associated operating costs. It is demonstrated that the distribution of deposits in a membrane fiber can be analyzed using simple filtration models, one of which is presented in this study. It has been demonstrated that most deposits are accumulated at the center of the fiber with the dead-end filtration mode. Hence, it would be reasonable to use cross-flow filtration to control this process. An engineering correlation convenient for practical application is proposed for calculating the Langelier index using the measured water quality indicators. The Langelier index is useful to substantiate whether acid washings are required or not required. It has been demonstrated that, with considerably unstable source water, prefiltration in a filter with a granular bed upstream the ultrafiltration unit stabilizes the quality and deaeration of the treated water. Acid or alkaline cleaning operations based on chemicals containing chelating agents to be performed twice a year have also been demonstrated to significantly increase the stability of the ultrafiltration unit. Practical recommendations are given for introducing the ultrafiltration regime, which were implemented at the water treatment plant of the Novocherkassk District Power Plant (GRES).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Panteleev, B. E. Ryabchikov, O. V. Khoruzhii, S. L. Gromov, and A. R. Sidorov, Membrane Separation Technologies in Industrial Water Treatment (DeLi Plyus, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Ho, Z. Ma, J. Qin, S. H. Sim, and C.-S. Toh, “Inline coagulation-ultrafiltration as the pretreatment for reverse osmosis brine treatment and recovery,” Desalination 365, 242–249 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Gilabert-Oriol, Optimization of Ultrafiltration Membrane Cleaning Processes. Pretreatment for Reverse Osmosis in Seawater Desalination Plants, Doctoral Thesis (Univ. Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 2013). https://www. researchgate.net/publication/268514675_Optimization_ of_ultrafiltration_membrane_cleaning_processes_ Pretreatment_for_reverse_osmosis_in_seawater_desalination_plants.

  4. G. K. Pearce, “The case for UF/MF pretreatment to RO in seawater applications,” Desalination 203, 286–295 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. N. Wolf, S. Siverns, and S. Monti, “UF membranes for RO desalination pretreatment,” Desalination 182, 293–300 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. F. Langelier, “The analytical control of anti-corrosion water treatment,” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 28, 1500–1521 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank B.E. Ryabchikov, S.Yu. Larionov, and A.R. Sidorov for helpful discussion of the study results as well as Yu.E. Korzina for help with the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute, 111250, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Panteleev

  2. Research and Production Company Mediana-Filter, 119270, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Panteleev, V. V. Bobinkin & V. B. Smirnov

  3. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), 141701, Dolgoprudny, Russia

    An. A. Panteleev

  4. All-Russia Thermal Engineering Institute, 115280, Moscow, Russia

    S. E. Lysenko

Authors
  1. A. A. Panteleev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. An. A. Panteleev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. V. Bobinkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. E. Lysenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. B. Smirnov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Smirnov.

Additional information

Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panteleev, A.A., Panteleev, A.A., Bobinkin, V.V. et al. Optimization of Operating Conditions for Ultrafiltration Units. Therm. Eng. 68, 777–784 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521090056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521090056

Keywords:

Search

Navigation