Skip to main content
Log in

A Software Package for Simulating Physicochemical Processes and Properties of Working Fluids

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER-PLANT FUELS, BURNER UNITS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A software package consisting of the TETRAN-PRO and the COND-KINET-1 proprietary computer codes, as well as computational methods and models they are based on, is described. The TETRAN-PRO code calculates the composition and thermodynamic properties of a multicomponent reacting system under thermodynamic equilibrium conditions, including products of combustion or pyrolysis of organic and composite fuels. The difference of this code from similar ones is the use of the method of prevailing components, which is most effective as to convergence, computation time, and the range of parameters used. The code includes the necessary database of the original thermodynamic properties for 3000 individual substances. The TETRAN-PRO code’s capabilities are demonstrated by the results from calculation of mercury vapors' conversion in the combustion products of Kuznetsk and Berezovo coals. The COND-KINET-1 calculates the parameters of a condensation aerosol formed during the bulk condensation in a vapor-gas mixture flow. The process is described with a system of moment equations for the droplet size distribution function, which is closed by the equations of momentum and energy. A comprehensive approach, thermodynamic and kinetic, has been formulated to the description of the bulk condensation in multicomponent reacting systems based on the TETRAN-PRO and COND-KINET-1 codes. The approach’s capabilities are demonstrated by the example of numerically simulating the formation of environmentally dangerous submicron particles in burning coals according to the condensation mechanism. Data on the concentration and size distribution of the generated particles are obtained. The predicted data on the fractional composition of particles are compared with the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Letter g means gaseous phase.

REFERENCES

  1. N. M. Kortsenshtein, G. Ya. Gerasimov, and Yu. B. Shmel’kov, TETRAN-PRO, Software Registration Certificate No. 2016663354 (2016).

  2. N. M. Kortsenshtein, L. V. Petrov, and Yu. B. Shmel’kov, COND-KINET-1, Software Registration Certificate No. 2017664075 (2017).

  3. W. R. Smith and R. W. Missen, Chemical Reaction. Equilibrium Analysis. Theory and Algorithms (Wiley, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. E. Alemasov, A. F. Dregalin, A. P. Tishin, and V. A. Khudyakov, Thermodynamic and Thermophysical Properties of Combustion Products (Vses. Inst. Nauchn. Tekh. Inf. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1971–1978), Vol. 1–5 [in Russian].

  5. G. B. Sinyarev, N. A. Vatolin, V. G. Trusov, and G. K. Moiseev, The Use of Computers for Thermodynamic Calculations of Metallurgical Processes (Nauka, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. E. Spencer and A. A. Orning, An Algorithm for Calculating Multiphase Chemical Equilibrium, Report No. 7786 (Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh, 1973).

  7. I. B. Rozhdestvenskii, K. K. Olevinskii, and V. P. Shevelev, “Composition and thermodynamic functions of a reacting gaseous or heterogeneous system,” Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 7, 42–47 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Ya. Gerasimov, N. A. Zhegul’skaya, I. B. Rozhdestvenskii, E. V. Samuilov, and N. A. Sheveleva, “Thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of products of combustion and organic fuel conversion,” Mat. Model. 10 (8), 3–16 (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. N. M. Kortsenshtein and E. V. Samuilov, “Interaction of the processes of volume condensation and thermal emission of electrons in a multicomponent reacting system,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 3, 169–185 (2005).

  10. E. V. Samuilov, “Chemical thermodynamics and indifferent states,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 1, 12–27 (2012).

  11. E. V. Samuilov and N. A. Sheveleva, “Thermodynamic properties of coal combustion products,” Therm. Eng. 53, 842–847 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Ya. Gerasimov, “Thermodynamic investigation of the behavior of ash-forming components in burning coal,” J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 76, 98–103 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Frandsen, K. Dam-Johansen, and P. Rasmussen, “Trace elements from combustion and gasification of coal — An equilibrium approach,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 20, 115–138 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(94)90007-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Thompson and B. B. Argent, “Thermodynamic equilibrium study of trace element mobilization under pulverized fuel combustion conditions,” Fuel 81, 345–361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00145-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Liu, Y. Wang, L. Yu, and J. Oakey, “Thermodynamic equilibrium study of trace element transformation during underground coal gasification,” Fuel Process. Technol. 87, 209–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. I. B. Rozhdestvenskii, V. N. Gutov, and N. A. Zhegul’skaya, “Coefficients of approximation of the thermodynamic potential for substances formed by atoms of Al, B, C, Ca, Cl, F, H, K, Li, Mg, N, Na, O, P, S, Si, Ti in the temperature range up to 6000 K,” in Thermophysical Properties of Chemically Reacting Heterogenous Mixtures (Energ. Inst. im. G. M. Krzhizhanovskogo (ENIN), Moscow, 1973), Vol. 7, pp. 88–121.

  17. L. V. Gurvich, “IVTANTERMO — Automatic data system of thermodynamic properties of substances,” Vestn. Akad. Nauk SSSR, No. 3, 54–65 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 2nd. ed., NBS-37 (American Chemical Society & American Inst. of Physics, Washington, 1971); JANAF Thermochemical Tables Supplement (American Chemical Society & American Inst. of Physics, Washington, 1974–1982).

  19. J. L. Haas, Jr., G. R. Robinson, and B. S. Hemingway, “Thermodynamic tabulations for selected phases in the system CaO‒Al2O3‒SiO2‒H2O at 101.325 kPa (1 atm) between 273.15 and 1800 K,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 10, 575–670 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. S. Vdovchenko, M. I. Martynova, N. V. Novitskii, and G. D. Yushina, Power-Generating Fuel of the USSR (Fossil Coals, Oil Shales, Peat, Fuel Oil and Combustible Natural Gas): Handbook (Energoizdat, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kolker, C. L. Senior, and J. Quick, “Mercury in coal and the impact of coal quality on mercury emissions from combustion systems,” Appl. Geochem. 21, 1821–1836 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. E. Romero, Y. Li, H. Bilirgen, N. Sarunac, and E. K. Levy, “Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers,” Fuel 85, 204–212 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. L. Senior, J. J. Helbe, and A. F. Sarofim, “Emissions of mercury, trace elements, and fine particles from stationary combustion sources,” Fuel Process. Technol. 65–66, 263–288 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00082-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Meij and H. Winkel, “Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands,” Sci. Total Environ. 368, 393–396 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. C. Butcher, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations (Wiley, New York, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. L. E. Sternin, Fundamentals of Gasdynamics of Two-Phase Nozzles Flows (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. M. Kortsenshteyn and L. V. Petrov, “Numerical simulation of bulk condensation in gas-vapor mixtures flowing through a nozzle,” Colloid J. 79, 333–340 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Pathak, J. Wolk, R. Strey, and B. E. Wyslouzil, “Co-condensation of nonane and D2O in a supersonic nozzle,” J. Chem. Phys. 140, 034304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4803202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Tomeczek and H. Palugniok, “Kinetics of mineral matter transformation during coal combustion,” Fuel 81, 1251–1258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00027-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Zhang and Y. Ninomiya, “Emission of suspended PM10 from laboratory-scale coal combustion and its correlation with coal mineral properties,” Fuel 85, 194–203 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. W. Dockery, C. A. Pope, X. P. Xu, J. D. Spengler, J. H. Ware, M. E. Fay, B. G. Ferris, Jr., and F. E. Speizer, “An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities,” N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1753–1759 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter (PM): EPA’s 2006 Revisions and Associated Issues, Congressional Research Service Report No. 7-5700, RL34762 (Congressional Research Service, 2013). https://www.crs.gov

  33. The List of Pollutants in Respect of Which Measures of State Regulation in the Field of Environmental Protection are Applied, Approved by Decree of RF Government No. 1316-r of July 8, 2015.

  34. F. Vejahati, Z. Xu, and R. Gupta, “Trace elements in coal: Associations with coal and minerals and their behavior during coal utilization — A review,” Fuel 89, 904–911 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. L. N. Lebedeva, N. M. Kortsenshtein, and E. V. Samuilov, “Thermodynamic assessment of the possibility of emission of submicron particles in the process of coal combustion,” Therm. Eng. 61, 911–916 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601514120052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. N. M. Kortsenshteyn and L. V. Petrov, “Thermodynamic assessment of the possibility of emission of submicron particles in the process of coal combustion,” Therm. Eng. 65, 911–916 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601514120052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. N. M. Kortsenshteyn, L. N. Lebedeva, L. V. Petrov, and E. V. Samuilov, “Simulation of parameters of submicron particles formed in combustion products of coals,” Colloid J. 77, 165–171 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Kashchiev, Nucleation. Basic Theory with Applications (Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  39. N. A. Fuchs, Evaporation and Droplet Growth in Gaseous Media (Pergamon, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. P. Kryukov, V. Yu. Levashov, and N. V. Pavlyukevich, “Condensation coefficient: Definitions, estimations, modern experimental and calculation data,” J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 87, 237–245 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. Kortsenshteyn.

Additional information

Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kortsenshteyn, N.M., Gerasimov, G.Y., Petrov, L.V. et al. A Software Package for Simulating Physicochemical Processes and Properties of Working Fluids. Therm. Eng. 67, 591–603 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520090049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520090049

Keywords:

Navigation