Abstract
One of the possible and, under certain conditions, sufficiently effective methods for reducing consumption of fuel and energy resources is the development of plants for combined generation of different kinds of energy. In the power industry of Russia, the facilities have become widespread in which the cogeneration technology, i.e., simultaneous generation of electric energy and heat, is implemented. Such facilities can use different plants, viz., gas- and steam-turbine plants and gas-reciprocating units. Cogeneration power supply can be further developed by simultaneously supplying the users not only with electricity and heat but also with cold. Such a technology is referred to as trigeneration. To produce electricity and heat, trigeneration plants can use the same facilities that are used in cogeneration, namely, gas-turbine plants, steam-turbine plants, and gas-reciprocating units. Cold can be produced in trigeneration plants using thermotransformers of various kinds, such as vaporcompression thermotransformers, air thermotransformers, and absorption thermotransformers, that operate as chilling machines. The thermotransformers can also be used in the trigeneration plants to generate heat. The main advantage of trigeneration plants based on gas-turbine plants or gas-reciprocating units over cogeneration plants is the increased thermodynamic power supply efficiency owing to utilization of the waste-gas heat not only in winter but also in summer. In the steam-turbine-based trigeneration plants equipped with absorption thermotransformers, the enhancement of the thermodynamic power supply efficiency is determined by the increase in the heat extraction load during the nonheating season. The article presents calculated results that demonstrate higher thermodynamic efficiency of a gas-turbine-based plant with an absorption thermotransformer that operates in the trigeneration mode compared with a cogeneration gas-turbine plant. The structural arrangements of trigeneration plants designed to supply electricity, heat, and cold to the users are shown and the principles of their operation are described. The article presents results of qualitative analysis of different engineering solutions applied to select one combination of power- and heat-generating equipment and thermotransformers or another.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. V. Klimenko, A. G. Tereshin, T. N. Andreichenko, A. V. Bokarev, E. V. Markovcheva, and L. P. Rogatovskaya, “Estimation of electrical energy consumption for a air conditioning in Moscow in the conditions of climate coming warming,” Energosber. Vodopodg., No. 1, 2–6, (2011).
V. S. Agababov, A. Yu. Arkharova, and N. V. Malafeeva, RF Patent 46565, Byull. Otkr. Izobr., 2005, no. 16.
J. Miller, Kalte aus Fernwarme im Aufwind, Blickpunkt AGFW aktuell, 2005.
K. Lucas, M. Gebhardt, H. Kohl, T. Steinrötter, Ableitung von Kostenfunktionen für Komponenten der rationellen Energienutzung. Stiftung Industrieforschung Forschungsvorhaben (Institut fur Energie-und Umwelttechnik, Duisburg, 2002).
D. Baumann, Energiewirtschaftliche Bewertung der dezentralen Kraft–Warme–Kalte–Kopplung, Dissertation, (VDI-Verlag, Dusseldorf, 2004).
M. Haider and G. Luedking, Auslegung und Wirtschaftlichkeit von KWKK–Anlagen. Teil 1. Luft-und Kältetechnik 2005.
M. Haider and G. Luedking, Auslegung und Wirtschaftlichkeit von KWKK Anlagen. Teil 2. Luft-und Kältetechnik 2005.
S. Göppert and T. Urbaneck, Machbarkeitsuntersuchung zur Starkung der Kraft–Warme–Kalte–Kopplung durch den Einsatz von Kaltespeichern in großen Versorgungssystemen, (Stadtwerke Chemnitz AG, Bereich Netze, Abteilung Fernwarme Fernkälte, 2006).
O. Ya. Kokorin, “Autonomic station preferences for common production of electric power, heat and cold,” Kholodil. Tekhn., No. 12, 3–6 (2003).
A. I. Bazhenov, E. V. Mikheeva, and Yu. M. Khlebalin, RF Patent 2457352, Byull. Izobret., 2012, no. 24.
V. S. Agababov, A. A. Sukhikh, K. I. Kuznetsov, A. A. Rogova, and A. A. Korshikova, “Experimental study of warm–pump unit work regimes at common production of heat and cold,” Novoe v Ross. Elektroenerg., No. 9, 26–38 (2012).
V. S. Agababov, U. I. Smirnova, and P. A. Tideman, “Development of high–effective vapor–gas thermal electric station schemes with system of simultaneous production of heat and cold,” Novoe v Ross. Elektroenerg., No. 8, 16–25 (2013).
A. V. Klimenko, V. S. Agababov, N. O. Baidakova, Yu. O. Baidakova, E. N. Oleinikova, and P. A. Tideman, “Effect of outside air temperature on thermodynamic efficiency of vapor–gas station with unit for common generation of heat and cold,” Novoe v Ross. Elektroenerg., No. 10, 5–19 (2013).
A. V. Klimenko, V. S. Agababov, A. A. Rogova, and P. A. Tideman, “Specific features of combined generation of electric power, heat, and cold by combined–cycle plants,” Therm. Eng. 62 (3), 166–170 (2015).
A. V. Klimenko, V. S. Agababov, V. D. Rozhnatovskii, Yu. O. Baidakova, A. A. Rogova, and P. A. Tideman, “Trigeneration technical–economic efficiency estimation for vapor–gas plant with vapor–compressed heat pump,” Novoe v Ross. Elektroenerg. No. 12, 5–14 (2013).
A. V. Klimenko, V. S. Agababov, A. A. Rogova, and P. A. Tideman, “Schemes of vapor–gas plant of condensation type and vapor–gas plant–thermal electric station with the systems of simultaneous superposed generation of heat and cold,” Energosber. Vodopodg. 87 (1), 20–23 (2014).
V. S. Agababov, Yu. O. Baidakova, A. V. Klimenko, A. A. Rogova, U. I. Smirnova, and P. A. Tideman, RF Patent 2530971, Byull. Izobr., 2014, no. 29.
J. Pitel and J. Seminsky, “Control of the nonconventional machinery for combined production of heat, cold and electrical energy,” Nonconv. Technol. Rev., No. 2, 83–86 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.V. Klimenko, V.S. Agababov, I.P. Il’ina, V.D. Rozhnatovskii, A.V. Burmakina, 2016, published in Teploenergetika.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klimenko, A.V., Agababov, V.S., Il’ina, I.P. et al. Layouts of trigeneration plants for centralized power supply. Therm. Eng. 63, 414–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516060045
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516060045