Skip to main content
Log in

Using Analytical Solutions to Evaluate the Variability of the Distribution of Concentrations of the Components of Specific Reactions in Microfluidic Systems

  • Published:
Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of methods for analyzing liquid media are based on carrying out specific reactions with the component to be determined. In microfluidic devices, due to the laminarity of the flow, it is difficult to organize uniform mixing of the reaction components, which deteriorates the reproducibility of the results of the reactions and the quality of the analysis. To improve the efficiency of passive mixing in microfluidic systems, you can use the input channel samples of variable geometry, in particular, with bends, or with a variable width. The mixing efficiency is directly related to the variability of reagent concentrations in the working area, and this characteristic is adequately evaluated through the dispersion of the concentration profile. To obtain an estimate of the dispersion of the concentration distribution, an analytical solution of the convective–diffusion equation using the method of moments is proposed. For this, the sample entry system—a straight section of constant width with an additional linearly expanding channel—is approximately replaced by an equivalent channel of constant width. Also, the values of convective velocity and diffusion coefficient are approximately replaced by averaged ones. The dispersion estimates obtained on the basis of an approximate analytical solution have an acceptable agreement with the results of numerical 2D modeling of convective mass transfer in COMSOL MULTYPHYSICS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barabash, V.M., Abiev, R.Sh., and Kulov, N.N., Theory and practice of mixing: A review, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2018, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1134/S004057951804036X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, Z., Méheust, Y., Neuweiler, I., Hu, R., Niemi, A., and Chen, Y.-F., Modeling immiscible two-phase flow in rough fractures from capillary to viscous fingering, Water Resour. Res., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2033–2056. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, J., Ning, Z., and Lv, M., Experimental study on the two-phase flow pattern and transformation characteristics of a flow mixing nozzle under a moderate flow rate, Meccanica, 2019, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01014-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Semenov, I.A., Ul’yanov, B.A., and Kulov, N.N., Experimental estimation of the vibration effect on the rate of mass transfer from a planar surface, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2016, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579516030106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lobasov, A.S., Minakov, A.V., and Rudyak, V.Ya., Flow modes of non-Newtonian fluids with power-law rheology in a T-shaped micromixer, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2018, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579518020112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dolomatov, M.Yu., Kazakov, M.A., and Zhuravleva, N.A., Simulation of systems with chaos in the chemical composition using stochastic methods, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2017, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 703–707. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579517050281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aris, R., On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1956, vol. 235, pp. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1956.0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, J., Lin, Q., and Mukherjee, T., Analytical dispersion models for efficient simulations on complex microchip electrophoresis system, Proc. 7th International Conference on Miniaturized Chemical and Biochemical Analysts Systems MicroTAS’03, Squaw Valley, Calif., 2003, vol. 1, p. 135.

  9. Magargle, R., Hoburg, J.F., and Mukherjee, T., An injector component model for complete microfluidic electrokinetic separation systems, Technical Proceedings of the 2004 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show (NSTI Nanotech 2004), Boston, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 77–80.

  10. Barton, N.G., On the method of moments for solute dispersion, J. Fluid Mech., 1983, vol. 126, pp. 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083000117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goltz, M.N. and Roberts, P.V., Using the method of moments to analyze three-dimensional diffusion-limited solute transport from temporal and spatial perspectives, Water Resour. Res., 1987, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1575–1585. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i008p01575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Govindaraju, R.S. and Das, B.S., Moment Analysis for Subsurface Hydrologic Applications, Water Science and Technology Library, vol. 61, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.

  13. Fischer, H.B., List, J.E., Koh, C.R., Imberger, J., and Brooks, N.H., Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters, New York: Academic, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giona, M., Adrover, A., Cerbelli, S., and Garofalo, F., Laminar dispersion at high Péclet numbers in finite-length channels: Effects of the near-wall velocity profile and connection with the generalized Leveque problem, Phys. Fluids, 2009, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 123 601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3263704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vedel, S., Hovad, E., and Bruus, H., Time-dependent Taylor–Aris dispersion of an initial point concentration, J. Fluid Mech., 2014, vol. 752, pp. 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukyanenko, K.A., Denisov, I.A., Yakimov, A.S., Esimbekova, E.N., Belousov, K.I., Bukatin, A.S., Kukhtevich, I.V., Sorokin, V.V., Evstrapov, A.A., and Belobrov, P.I., Analytical enzymatic reactions in microfluidic chips, Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pз. 775–780. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683817070043

  17. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., Teoreticheskaya fizika: uchebnoe posobie. T. 6. Gidrodinamika (Theoretical Physics: A Textbook, vol. 6: Hydrodynamics), Moscow: Nauka, 2001.

  18. Esikova, N.A., Bulyanitsa, A.L., Klotchenko, S.A., Taraskin, A.S., and Evstrapov, A.A., The influence of hydrodynamic conditions and chamber geometry on the analytical signal from integrated biochips, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2018, vol. 1135, article no. 012 021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1135/1/012021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was completed under the terms of task no. 075-00780-19-00 of the government of the Russian Federation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Bulyanitsa.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by P. Vlasov

Special issue: “Two-phase flows in microchannels: hydrodynamics, heat and mass transfer, chemical reactions”. Edited by R.Sh. Abiev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulyanitsa, A.L., Belousov, K.I. & Evstrapov, A.A. Using Analytical Solutions to Evaluate the Variability of the Distribution of Concentrations of the Components of Specific Reactions in Microfluidic Systems. Theor Found Chem Eng 54, 17–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579520010030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579520010030

Keywords:

Navigation