Abstract
We study Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds \((f,G)\) with \(f=x_1^n+\cdots+x_N^n\) and \(G=S\ltimes G^d\), where \(S\subseteq S_N\) and \(G^d\) is either the maximal group of scalar symmetries of \(f\) or the intersection of the maximal diagonal symmetries of \(f\) with \(SL_N(\mathbb{C})\). We construct a mirror map between the corresponding phase spaces and prove that it is an isomorphism restricted to a certain subspace of the phase space when \(n=N\) is a prime number. When \(S\) satisfies the parity condition of Ebeling–Gusein-Zade, this subspace coincides with the full space. We also show that two phase spaces are isomorphic for \(n=N=5\).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Intriligator and C. Vafa, “Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B, 339, 95–120 (1990).
C. Vafa, “String vacua and orbifoldized \(LG\) models,” Modern Phys. Lett. A, 4, 1169–1185 (1989).
E. Witten, “Phases of \(N=2\) theories in two dimensions,” Nuclear Phys. B, 403, 159–222 (1993); arXiv: hep-th/9301042.
D. Shklyarov, “On Hochschild invariants of Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 24, 189–258 (2020).
H. Fan, T. Jarvis, and Y. Ruan, “The Witten equation, mirror symmetry, and quantum singularity theory,” Ann. Math. (2), 178, 1–106 (2013).
N. Priddis, J. Ward, and M. M. Williams, “Mirror symmetry for nonabelian Landau–Ginzburg models,” SIGMA, 16, 059, 31 pp. (2020); arXiv: 1812.06200.
P. Berglund and M. Henningson, “Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, mirror symmetry and the elliptic genus,” Nucl. Phys. B, 433, 311–332 (1995).
P. Berglund and T. Hübsch, “A generalized construction of mirror manifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B, 393, 377–391 (1993).
M. Krawitz, “FJRW rings and Landau–Ginzburg mirror symmetry”; arXiv: 0906.0796.
A. Francis, T. Jarvis, D. Johnson, and R. Suggs, “Landau–Ginzburg mirror symmetry for orbifolded Frobenius algebras,” in: String-Math 2011 (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 85, J. Block, J. Distler, R. Donagi, E. Sharpe, eds.), AMS, Providence, RI (2012), pp. 333–353.
A. Basalaev and A. Takahashi, “Hochschild cohomology and orbifold Jacobian algebras associated to invertible polynomials,” J. Noncommut. Geom., 14, 861–877 (2020).
A. Basalaev, A. Takahashi, and E. Werner, “Orbifold Jacobian algebras for invertible polynomials,” arXiv: 1608.08962.
A. Basalaev, A. Takahashi, and E. Werner, “Orbifold Jacobian algebras for exceptional unimodal singularities,” Arnold Math. J., 3, 483–498 (2017); arXiv: 1702.02739.
D. Mukai, “Nonabelian Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds and Calabi–Yau/Landau–Ginzburg correspondence,” arXiv: 1704.04889.
W. Ebeling and S. M. Gusein-Zade, “A version of the Berglund–Hübsch–Henningson duality with non-abelian groups,” Int. Math. Res. Not., 2021, 12305–12329 (2019).
W. Ebeling and S. M. Gusein-Zade, “Dual invertible polynomials with permutation symmetries and the orbifold Euler characteristic,” SIGMA, 16, 051, 15 pp. (2020); arXiv: 1907.11421.
A. Basalaev and A. Ionov, “Hochschild cohomology of Fermat type polynomials with non-abelian symmetries,” arXiv: 2011.05937.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee for many important remarks.
Funding
The authors acknowledge partial support by the RSF (grant no. 19-71-00086) and by the International Laboratory of Cluster Geometry, HSE University (RF Government grant, agreement no. 075-15-2021-608 from 08.06.2021). In particular, the proof of Theorem 1 was obtained under the support of the RSF (grant no. 19-71-00086) and the proof of Theorem 2 was obtained under the support of the International Laboratory of Cluster Geometry, HSE University (RF Government grant).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, 2021, Vol. 209, pp. 205–223 https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf10104.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basalaev, A.A., Ionov, A.A. Mirror map for Fermat polynomials with a nonabelian group of symmetries. Theor Math Phys 209, 1491–1506 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921110015
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921110015