Skip to main content
Log in

Why do the microstructures of the main pulse and the interpulse of the pulsar in the Crab nebula differ so dramatically?

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pulsars are magnetized neutron stars. They are not resolved by modern radio telescopes and are studied only by radiation coming from the regions of the magnetic poles. Because of the rotation, this narrow radiation is received as pulses. In a few pulsars whose magnetic axis is almost orthogonal to the rotation axis (the simplest hypothesis), pulses are observed from both poles: the (main) pulse and the interpulse. Such objects primarily include a pulsar in the Crab nebula, observed at many frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum. In the remarkable work of Hankins and Eilek, a striking difference between the spectra of the main pulse and the interpulse in the Crab nebula in the centimeter wavelength range at microsecond resolution was found (surprising the authors: “In traditional pulsar models... the MP and IP should be the same in their observable quantities (such as spectrum, time signature, or dispersion). We were—and remain—quite surprised that this turns out not to be the case in the Crab pulsar.” See T. H. Hankins and J. A. Eilek, “Radio emission signatures in the Crab pulsar,” Astrophys. J., 670:693–701, 2007). In particular, a wide range of frequencies was observed in the spectra of the main pulse forming “vertical structures,” while “horizontal structures” with distinguished frequencies were observed in the spectra of the interpulse at the same frequencies. Such a difference, related to different radiation mechanisms (nonrelativistic electron emission in a longitudinal accelerating field for the main pulse and relativistic positron radiation due to the curvature of magnetic field lines for the interpulse), is explained by the change from the nonrelativistic to the relativistic mechanism as the frequency increases. Therefore, the frequencies at which the mechanism changes differ for the main pulse and the interpulse. The frequency of observation in the work of Hankins and Eilek is just between these frequencies with which the difference in the microstructure is connected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. G. Smith, Pulsars, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1977).

  2. V. M. Lipunov, Astrophysics of Neutron Stars [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987); English transl., Springer, Heidelberg (1992).

  3. V. S. Beskin, MHD Flows in Compact Astrophysical Objects, Springer, Berlin (2010).

  4. P. Haensel, A. Yu. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, Neutron Stars 1 (Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr., Vol. 326), Springer, New York (2007).

  5. A. Yu. Potekhin, “The physics of neutron stars,” Phys. Usp., 53, 1235–1256 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Moffett and T. Hankins, “Multifrequency radio observations of the Crab pulsar,” Astrophys. J., 468, 779–783 (1996); arXiv:astro-ph/9604163v1 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. H. Hankins, G. Jones, and J. A. Eilek, “The Crab pulsar at centimeter wavelengths: I. Ensemble characteristics,” Astrophys. J., 802, 130 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. M. Kontorovich and S. V. Trofymenko, “On the mystery of the interpulse shift in the Crab pulsar,” J. Phys. Sci. Appl., 7, 11–28 (2017); arXiv:1707.01584v3 [astro-ph.HE] (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. M. Kontorovich, “Nonlinear reflection from the surface of a neutron stars and features of radio emission from the pulsar in the Crab nebula,” Low. Temp. Phys., 42, 672–678 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Timokhin and J. Arons, “Current flow and pair creation at low altitude in rotation powered pulsars’ force-free magnetospheres: Space-charge limited flow,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 429, 20–54 (2013); arXiv:1206.5819v2 [astro-ph.HE] (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Timokhin and A. K. Harding, “On the polar cap cascade pair multiplicity of young pulsars,” J. Astrophys., 810, 144 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. M. Fawley, J. Arons, and E. T. Scharlemann, “Potential drops above pulsar polar caps: Acceleration of nonneutral beams from the stellar surface,” Astrophys. J., 217, 227–243 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Course of Theoretical Physics [in Russian], Vol. 4, Quantum Electrodynamics, Nauka, Moscow (1989); English transl. prev. ed., Pergamon, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Erber, “High-energy electromagnetic conversion processes in intense magnetic fields,” Rev. Modern Phys., 38, 626–659 (1966).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Shibata, J. Miyazaki, and F. Takahara, “On the electric field screening by electron–positron pairs in the pulsar magnetosphere II,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 336, 233–242 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Kontorovich and A. B. Flanchik, “High-frequency cutoff and change of radio emission mechanism in pulsars,” Astrophys. Space Sci., 345, 169–175 (2013); arXiv:1201.0261v4 [astro-ph.SR] (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, New York (1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, A Course of Theoretical Physics [in Russian], Vol. 2, The Classical Theory of Fields, Nauka, Moscow (1967); English transl., Pergamon, Oxford (1971).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. V. M. Kontorovich and A. B. Flanchik, “Correlation of pulsar radio emission spectrum with peculiarities of particle acceleration in a polar gap,” JETP, 116, 80–86 (2013); arXiv:1210.2858v1 [astro-ph.SR] (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. H. Hankins and J. A. Eilek, “Radio emission signatures in the Crab pulsar,” Astrophys. J., 670, 693–701 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. H. Hankins, J. S. Kern, J. C. Weatherall, and J. A. Eilek, “Nanosecond radio bursts from strong plasma turbulence in the Crab pulsar,” Nature, 422, 141–143 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Eilek and T. Hankins, “Radio emission physics in the Crab pulsar,” J. Plasma Phys., 82, 635820302 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. V. Zheleznyakov, V. V. Zaitsev, and E. Ya. Zlotnik, “On the analogy between the zebra patterns in radio emission from the sun and the Crab pulsar,” Astron. Lett., 38, 589–604 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. A. Soglasnov, M. V. Popov, N. Bartel, W. Cannon, A. Yu. Novikov, V. I. Kondratiev, and V. I. Altunin, “Giant pulses from PSR B1937+21 with widths 15 nanoseconds and Tb ≥ 5 × 1039 K, the highest brightness temperature observed in the Universe,” Astrophys. J., 616, 439–451 (2004); arXiv:astro-ph/0408285v1 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. V. M. Kontorovich, “Giant pulses from pulsars [in Russian],” Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 4, No. 68, 143–148 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. M. Kontorovich, “On high brightness temperature of pulsar giant pulses,” J. Phys. Sci. Appl., 5, 48–60 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. M. Kontorovich, “Quantization of an electromagnetic tornado and the origin of bands in the spectrum of giant pulses from the Crab pulsar,” Astronomy Lett., 40, 793–799 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. C. Davidson, Theory of Nonneutral Plasmas, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, Mass. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. M. Kontorovich, “Electromagnetic tornado in the vacuum gap of a pulsar,” JETP, 110, 966–972 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Kontorovich.

Ethics declarations

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 202, No. 3, pp. 447–457, March, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontorovich, V.M. Why do the microstructures of the main pulse and the interpulse of the pulsar in the Crab nebula differ so dramatically?. Theor Math Phys 202, 390–398 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577920030113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577920030113

Keywords

Navigation