Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinearity in Inverse Problems of Asteroid Dynamics

  • Published:
Solar System Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A collision of an asteroid with the Earth in the future is always considered as a probabilistic event because the asteroid orbit determined from observations with random errors inevitably contains an uncertainty in its parameters. To establish the probability of collision, the parametric uncertainty as a probabilistic distribution of virtual objects is mapped by the orbital model into the physical space for the period of the asteroid rendezvous with the Earth, and then the probabilistic mass penetrating into the planet body is estimated. The asteroid impact on the Earth is a very significant phenomenon because it can have fatal consequences for mankind. Therefore, probabilistic estimation of collision with potentially hazardous asteroids must be carried out very carefully with allowance for various subtle aspects. In this work, nonlinearity in inverse problems of asteroid dynamics under different observation conditions for various types of determined orbits is studied. The main problem we set ourselves is to examine to what extent nonlinearity can affect the accuracy of a probabilistic estimation when the parametric uncertainty is simulated using classical linear stochastic methods. To study the total, parameter-effect, and intrinsic nonlinearities, we introduce original indices with justified threshold values determined from the maximum tolerable biases of probabilistic estimates due to nonlinearity. The general analysis of nonlinearity is carried out for potentially hazardous asteroids observed in one appearance before June 2020. In particular, it is shown that main factors of strong nonlinearity are the short observed orbital arc (less than one degree) and the small observation period (less than ten days). Moreover, the situation is aggravated if the asteroid moves during the observation along the ecliptic and near it on an arc with small curvature. It is also established that, due to strong nonlinearity in problems of probabilistic estimation, nonlinear stochastic methods are required to simulate the orbital uncertainty for almost half of the potentially hazardous asteroids (44%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The intrinsic nonlinearity does not depend on the choice of the initial epoch.

REFERENCES

  1. Avdyushev, V.A., Chislennoe modelirovanie orbit nebesnykh tel (Numerical Modeling of Orbits of Celestial Bodies), Tomsk: Izd. Dom Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2015.

  2. Avdyushev, V.A., Intrinsic nonlinearity and method of disturbed observations in inverse problems of celestial mechanics, Celest. Mech., 2017, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 537–552.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Avdyushev, V.A., Nonlinear methods of statistic simulation of virtual parameter values for investigating uncertainties in orbits determined from observations, Celest. Mech., 2011, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 369–388.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G., Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G., Relative curvature measures of nonlinearity, J. R. Stat. Soc., 1980, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–25.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Beale, E.M.L., Confidence regions in non-linear estimation, J. R. Stat. Soc., 1960, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–88.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bordovitsyna, T.V., Avdyushev, V.A., and Chernitsov, A.M., New trends in numerical simulation of the motion of solar system small bodies, Celest. Mech., 2001, vol. 80, nos. 3–4, pp. 227–247.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowell, E., Virtanen, J., Muinonen, K., and Boattini, A., Asteroid orbit computation, in Asteroids III, Bottke, W.F., Jr., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 2002, pp. 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chernitsov, A.M., Analysis of some simplified schemes for determining estimates of the parameters of the motion of celestial bodies, Astron. Geod., 1975, no. 5, pp. 6–19.

  10. Chernitsov, A.M., Baturin, A.P., and Tamarov, V.A., An analysis of some methods for the determination of the probabilistic evolution of motion of the solar system’s small bodies, Sol. Syst. Res., 1998, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 405–412.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chernitsov, A.M., Tamarov, V.A., and Barannikov, Ye.A., Construction of confidence regions in the problem of asteroid orbit determination, Sol. Syst. Res., 2017, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 400–408.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chesley, S. and Chodas, P., Impact risk estimation and assessment scales, in Handbook of Cosmic Hazards and Planetary Defense, Pelton, J.N. and Allahdadi, F., Eds., Springer, 2015, pp. 651–662.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Desmars, J., Arlot, S., Arlot, J.-E., Lainey, V., and Vienne, A., Estimating the accuracy of satellite ephemerides using the bootstrap method, Astron. Astrophys., 2009, vol. 62, pp. 321–330.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H., Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Emel’yanov, N., Precision of the ephemerides of outer planetary satellites, Planet. Space Sci., 2010, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 411–420.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Everhart, E., Implicit single sequence methods for integrating orbits, Celest. Mech., 1974, vol. 10, pp. 35–55.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Milani, A., The identification problem I: Recovery of lost asteroids, Icarus, 1999, vol. 137, pp. 269–292.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Muinonen, K. and Bowell, E., Asteroid orbit determination using Bayesian probabilities, Icarus, 1993, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 255–279.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Muinonen, K., Virtanen, J., Granvik, M., and Laakso, T., Asteroid orbits using phase-space volumes of variation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 2006, vol. 368, pp. 809–818.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P., Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2007.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Syusina, O.M., Chernitsov, A.M., and Tamarov, V.A., Construction of confidence regions in problem on probabilistic study into motion of minor bodies of the solar system, Sol. Syst. Res., 2012, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 195–207.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Virtanen, J., Muinonen, K., and Bowell, E., Statistical ranging of asteroid orbits, Icarus, 2001, vol. 154, pp. 412–431.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out within the framework of the state contract of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project no. 0721-2020-0049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Avdyushev.

Additional information

Translated by A. Nikol’skii

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avdyushev, V.A., Syusina, O.M. & Tamarov, V.A. Nonlinearity in Inverse Problems of Asteroid Dynamics. Sol Syst Res 55, 71–82 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094621010019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094621010019

Keywords:

Navigation