Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of a Pulsed Plasma Beam on the Structure and the Phase Composition of the Surface Layers in Ferritic–Martensitic Steels

  • Published:
Russian Metallurgy (Metally) Aims and scope

Abstract

The structure–phase changes that are caused in the surface layers of ferritic–martensitic Eurofer 97 and 10Cr9WV steel samples by the action of pulsed powerful fluxes of deuterium plasma and deuterium ions, which are generated in a plasma focus (PF) setup, are studied. Before tests, the steels were subjected to standard heat treatment (normalizing, tempering), and the 10Cr9WV steel samples were additionally annealed at 600°C for 600 h to determine the stability of the structure and properties at the temperatures that are close to the operating temperatures. During irradiation, the power densities of plasma (qpl = 107–1010 W/cm2) and ion (qi = 109–1012 W/cm2) fluxes and the number of plasma beam pulses (5–12 at a pulse duration of ~100 ns) are varied. The irradiation of the Eurofer 97 steel at qpl = 108–1010 W/cm2 in the PF setup is shown to cause melting and ultrafast solidification of the surface layer with the subsequent formation of a fine cellular structure with a cell size of 100–150 nm in it. The surface film formed on the 10Cr9WV steel samples during preliminary long-term annealing is found to begin to fail at qpl = 108 W/cm2; this film is fully removed at qpl = 1010 W/cm2. This process is accompanied by the segregation of particles 1–3 μm in size, which are enriched in manganese, chromium, and oxygen. After the surface film is removed, irradiation promotes the removal of manganese from the surface layers, and manganese is also removed from the Eurofer 97 steel, which has no surface film in the initial state. The plasma beam treatment of the Eurofer 97 steel in the PF working chamber at qpl = 108 W/cm2 is found to cause the formation of retained austenite in its structure, and the content of retained austenite in the 10Cr9WV steel subjected to similar treatment is lower than in the Eurofer 97 steel by a factor of 20 because of the presence of a film on its surface. The irradiation of the 10Cr9WV steel at a higher power density (qpl = 1010 W/cm2), when the surface film is removed, equalizes the contents of retained austenite in the steels under study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. L. Klueh and A. T. Nelson, “Ferritic/martensitic steels for next-generation reactors,” J. Nucl. Mater. 371, 37–52 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Li, Q. Huang, Y. Wu, T. Nagasaka, and T. Muroga, “Mechanical properties and microstructures of China low activation martensitic steel compared with JLF-1,” J. Nucl. Mater. 367370, 117–121 (2007).

  3. S. V. Rogozhkin, V. S. Ageev, A. A. Aleev, A. G. Zaluzhnyi, M. V. Leont’eva-Smirnova, and A. A. Nikitin, “Tomographic atom-probe analysis of temperature-resistant 12%-chromium ferrite–martensite steel EK-181,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 108 (6), 612–618 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. A. Polekhina, I. Yu. Litovchenko, K. V. Almaeva, A. N. Tyumentsev, Yu. P. Pinzhin, V. M. Chernov, and M. V. Leont’eva-Smirnova, “Comparative investigation of the microstructures, the mechanical properties, and the fractures of high-temperature martensitic steels EK-181, ChS-139, and EP 823 in the temperature range from –196 to 720°C,” VANT, Ser. Termoyad. Sintez 41 (4), 38–47 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Huang, N. Baluc, Y. Dai, S. Jitsukawa, A. Kimura, J. Konys, R. J. Kurtz, R. Lindau, T. Muroga, G. R. Odette, B. Raj, R. E. Stoller, L. Tan, H. Tanigawa, A.-A. F. Tavassoli, T. Yamamoto, F. Wan, and Y. Wu, “Recent progress of R&D activities on reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels,” J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S2–S8 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. N. Kompaniets, “Choice of steels for DEMO reactor,” VANT, Ser. Termoyad. Sintez, No. 3, 16–24 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. I. Khripunov, V. B. Petrov, S. N. Kornienko, A. M. Muksunov, A. S. Rupyshev, and V. V. Shapkin, “Interaction of stationary plasma with the materials of a thermonuclear reactor on model plants,” VANT, Ser. Termoyad. Sintez, No. 4, 24–31 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Bernard, H. Bruzzone, P. Choi, H. Chuaqui, V. Gribkov, J. Herrera, K. Hirano, A. Krejci, S. Lee, C. Luo, F. Mezzetti, M. Sadowski, H. Schmidt, K. Ware, S. Wong, and V. Zoita, “Scientific status of plasma focus research,” J. Moscow Phys. Soc. 8 (2), 93–170 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Cicuttin, M. L. Crespo, V. A. Gribkov, J. Niemela, C. Tuniz, C. Zanolli, M. Chernyshova, E. V. Demina, S. V. Latyshev, V. N. Pimenov, and A. A. Talab, “Experimental results on the irradiation of nuclear fusion relevant materials at the dense plasma focus “Bora” device,” Nucl. Fusion 55, 063037 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/55/6/063037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. A. Gribkov, “Physical processes taking place in dense plasma focus devices at the interaction of hot plasma and fast ion streams with materials under test,” Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57, 065010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/57/6/065010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. A. Gribkov, L. Karpinski, P. Strzyzewski, M. Scholz, and A. V. Dubrovsky, “New efficient low-energy dense plasma focus in IPPLM,” Czechoslovak J. Phys. 54 (Suppl.), 191–197 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Maslyaev, “Thermal effects during the pulsed irradiation of materials in a Plasma Focus plant,” Perspekt. Mater., No. 5, 47–55 (2007).

  13. G. G. Bondarenko, “Effect of irradiation on evaporation of several structural materials,” Soviet Mater. Sci. 24 (5), 514–515 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. N. Pimenov, V. A. Gribkov, L. I. Ivanov, M. Shol’ts, Yu. E. Ugaste, E. V. Demina, S. A. Maslyaev, A. V. Dubrovskii, R. Miklashevskii, B. Kolman, and A. A. Kadentsov, “On new possibilities of Plasma Focus plants for surface modification of materials,” Perspekt. Mater., No. 1, 13–23 (2003).

  15. E. V. Demina, L. I. Ivanov, S. A. Maslyaev, V. N. Pimenov, I. P. Sasinovskaya, V. A. Gribkov, and A. V. Dubrovskii, “Surface modification of steel tubes by pulsed ion and high-temperature plasma fluxes,” Perspekt. Mater., No. 5, 41–48 (2008).

  16. I. V. Borovitskaya, V. Ya. Nikulin, G. G. Bondarenko, A. B. Mikhailova, P. V. Silin, A. I. Gaidar, V. V. Paramonova, and E. N. Peregudova, “Effect of pulsed nitrogen plasma and nitrogen ion fluxes on the structure and mechanical properties of vanadium,” Russ. Metall. (Metally), No. 3, 266–275 (2018).

  17. V. A. Gribkov, E. V. Demina, A. V. Dubrovskii, L. I. Ivanov, A. V. Kovtun, T. I. Laas, S. A. Maslyaev, V. N. Pimenov, A. Tartari, Yu. E. Ugaste, and M. Shol’ts, “Effect of pulsed fluxes of high-density deuterium and hydrogen plasma on ferritic and austenitic steels in a Plasma Focus plant,” Perspekt. Mater., No. 1, 16–25 (2008).

  18. S. V. Latyshev, V. A. Gribkov, S. A. Maslyaev, V. N. Pimenov, M. Padukh, and E. Zelin’ska, “Generation of shock waves in materials science experiments on a Plasma Focus plant,” Perspekt. Mater., No. 8, 5–12 (2014).

  19. I. V. Borovitskaya, V. N. Pimenov, V. A. Gribkov, M. Padukh, G. G. Bondarenko, A. I. Gaidar, V. V. Paramonova, and E. V. Morozov, “Structural changes in the vanadium sample surface induced by pulsed high-temperature deuterium plasma and deuterium ion fluxes,” Russ. Metall. (Metally), No. 11, 928–935 (2017).

  20. G. G. Bondarenko, Ya. Ya. Udris, N. V. Chikharev, and V. L. Yakushin, “Behavior of aluminum materials on irradiation by powerful pulsed hydrogen-plasma fluxes,” Russ. Metall. (Metally), No. 3, 91–95 (1998).

  21. I. I. Novikov, Theory of Heat Treatment of Metals (Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was performed in terms of state assignment no. 075-00746-19-00.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Borovitskaya.

Additional information

Translated by K. Shakhlevich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borovitskaya, I.V., Pimenov, V.N., Gribkov, V.A. et al. Effect of a Pulsed Plasma Beam on the Structure and the Phase Composition of the Surface Layers in Ferritic–Martensitic Steels. Russ. Metall. 2020, 238–249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036029520030027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036029520030027

Keywords:

Navigation