Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Viscometric Study of Ionic Interactions of MgSO4 in Water and Water–Ethanol Mixtures at Different Temperatures

  • PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF SOLUTIONS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The viscosity and density of water and water-ethanol mixtures containing different concentrations of MgSO4 were measured in the temperature range of 303.15 to 323.15 K with a difference of 5.0 K. The viscosity increased with an increase in the concentration of MgSO4 and ethanol in the solution while it decreased with the increase of temperature. The density of the solutions increased with an increase in the concentration of MgSO4 while it decreased with an increase in the concentration of ethanol in the solution. The ionic interactions were evaluated from the straight-line plots of the Jones–Dole equation; ηsp/C1/2 = A + BC1/2. The ion-solvent interactions decreased while the ion-ion interactions increased with the increase of temperature. A negative dB/dT confirmed the structure-making behavior of Mg2+ ions in water and water-ethanol mixtures. The plots of the Moulik equation were linear with good correlation coefficients and the fluidity parameters were found to be strongly dependent on the temperature. The activation energy (Ea) was negative which supports the structure-making behavior of Mg2+ ions. The thermodynamic parameters provided evidence that the interaction of MgSO4 with water and water-ethanol mixture is an exothermic and structure-promoting process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B. B. Danahy, D. L. Minnick, and M. B. Shiflett, Fermentation 4, 72 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Maitra and S. Bagchi, J. Mol. Liq. 137, 131 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ben-Naim, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 3809 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Reichardt, Chem. Rev. 94, 2319 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. S. Ghoraishi, J. E. Hawk, A. Phani, M. F. Khan, and T. Thundat, Sci. Rep. 6, 23966 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Li, X. Wang, M. D. Passaro, N. Spinelli, and B. Apicella, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 26, 1665 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Frank and D. J. Ives, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 20, 1 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. K. Schofield and E. K. Rideal, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 109, 57 (1925).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. K. Schofield and E. K. Rideal, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 110, 167 (1926).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Li, C. Song, L. Xu, and G. Liu, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 94, 1356 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. S. Jyostna, B. Satheesh, D. Sreenu, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 93, 278 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Pan, D. Li, M. Guoa, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 94, 2574 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Aftabuzzaman, M. M. Islam Nasiruddin, F. R. Rima, et al., J. Chem. Thermodyn. 96, 181 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. R. Master and N. I. Malek, J. Mol. Liq. 196, 120 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Thirumaran and K. Sathish, Res. J. Chem. Sci. 1, 63 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Seki, K. Hayamizu, S. Tsuzuki, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, 542 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Sundaramurthy, B. Rajamannan, and S. Rajalakshmi, Int. J. Curr. Res. 3, 89 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. N. Roy, D. Ekka, and R. Dewan, Acta Chim. Slov. 58, 792 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. L. C. Heda, R. Sharma, S. R. Mosalpuri, and P. B. Chaudhari, Ecl. Quim. Sao Paulo 35, 23 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Rajagopal and S. S. Jayabalakrishnan, Chi. J. Chem. Eng. 17, 796 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Jaka, B. Marija, K. Cveto, and R. Darja, J. Sol. Chem. 37, 1329 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Zamir and A. Khan, J. Chem. Soc. Pakist. 27, 130 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Ali, A. K. Nain, N. Kumar, and M. Ibrahim, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 114, 495 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. G. Shankarwar, V. A. Shelke, and S. G. Shankarwar, Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2, 426 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Jayalaksmi and K. S. Reddy, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 94, 457 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. S. Solanki, S. Tripathy, M. Tripath, and U. N. Dash, El.-J. Chem. 7, 223 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. R. Khan, Shama, R. Saeed, and F. Uddin, J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Mgt. 9, 15 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. R. Rohindra, R. A. Lata, and R. K. Coll, Eur. J. Phys. 33, 1457 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. D. Pandey and Y. Akhtar, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 109, 289 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. R. Schroeder, B. E. Poling, and D. B. Manley, J. Chem. Eng. Data 27, 256 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Y. Takiguchi and M. Uematsu, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 28, 7 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Swiatla-Wojcik, A. Pabis, and J. Szala, Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 6, 555 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. S. L. Wallen, B. J. Palmer, B. C. Garrett, and C. R. Yonker, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3959 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. G. Jones and M. Dole, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 2950 (1929).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Saeed, S. Masood, and S. M. S. Nadeem, Int. J. Chem. 4, 28 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. K. H. Kapandis and A. P. Hiray, Chem. Sci. Trans. 2, 485 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Saeed, F. Uddin, S. Masood, and N. Asif, J. Mol. Liq. 146, 112 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. H. Ahmed, Y. Khan, S. S. Shah, A. Mumtaz, M. A. Razi, and E. A. Mukhtar, J. Chem. Soc. Pakist. 26, 5 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Kaminsky, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 24, 171 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. H. Peng and A. V. Nguyen, J. Mol. Liq. 263, 109 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Kumar, S. Kant, and D. Kaushal, Z. Phys. Chem. 233, 255 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. S. P. Musale, P. S. Babalsure, and D. D. Pawar, J. Mol. Liq. 319, 114197 (2020).

  43. S. Thawarkar, N. D. Khupse, and A. Kumar, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 475 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. S. P. Moulik, J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4682 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. B. F. Aderson and K. O. Ipinmoroti, Pakist. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 42, 325 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. R. Nightingale, Jr. and R. F. Benck, J. Phys. Chem. 63, 1777 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. E. A. Masimov, B. G. Pashayev, and H. Sh. Hasanov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 93, 988 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. O. Y. Samoilov, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 24, 141 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. E. R. Nightingale, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 63, 1381 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. F. J. Rubio-Hernandez, A. I. Gomez-Merino, R. Delgado-Garcia, and N. M. Paez-Flor, Powder Technol. 308, 318 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public Sector Organization, Karachi, Pakistan

    Syed Muhammad Saqib Nadeem

Authors
  1. Syed Muhammad Saqib Nadeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Muhammad Saqib Nadeem.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saqib Nadeem, S.M. Viscometric Study of Ionic Interactions of MgSO4 in Water and Water–Ethanol Mixtures at Different Temperatures. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 849–859 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422040306

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422040306

Keywords:

Search

Navigation