Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of ontogeny and nature of heterochronies

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Every aspect of biological orderliness is a result of evolution, which expresses the systemic reorganization of organismal body plan, along with the way of its ontogenetic formation. Phyletic changes in the developmental rates (heterochronies) experienced by the organism or its structures exemplify just a kind of such consequences. The current belief that heterochronies are the causes of evolutionary events is based on the assumption that evolution of ontogeny proceeds in the same way as the ontogeny itself, i.e., from a germ cell to adult state. This premise (termed here “the central dogma”) is the cornerstone of traditional ideas of the evolutionary mechanism, regardless of whether it is perceived in terms of gene mutations or “embryonic modes.” In fact, the directions of two transformations compared are opposite each other. An evolutionary change in the body plan results from reorganization of the developmental system, which comes in response to disturbance of stability of the system’s terminal (adult) state. Realized by selection, this change starts immediately from the terminal state and then spreads in generations towards early ontogenetic stages. Heterochronies show just the same dynamics of events irrespective of whether they reflect the acceleration or delay of development. Empirically, such course of evolutionary changes was grounded most evidently by Severtsov in the early version of his concept of the phylembryogenesis. The theoretical basis of the same regularity is provided by the Schmalhausen–Waddington’s theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberch, P., Ontogenesis and morphological diversification, Am. Zool., 1980, vol. 20, pp. 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences, Syst. Zool., 1985, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., Gould, S., Oster, G., and Wake, D., Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology, 1979, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, F.M., Address to the Department of Anatomy and Physiology of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, in The works of F.M. Balfour, Foster, M. and Sedgwick, A., Eds., London: Macmillan, 1885, vol. 1, pp. 698–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, G., Embryos and Ancestors, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L.S., Patterns in the formation of organic forms, in L.S. Berg. Trudy po teorii evolyutsii. 1922-1930 (L.S. Berg: Works on the Evolutionary Theory, 1922–1930), Leningrad: Nauka, 1977, pp. 312–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E.C., The organization of cell-lineage of the ascidian egg, J. Acad. Natur. Sci. Philad., 1905, vol. 13, pp. 1–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E.D., The Origin of the Fittest, New York: McMillan, 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E.D., The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution, Chicago: Open Court Publ. Co., 1904.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Ch., Proiskhozhdenie vidov putem estestvennogo otbora (The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection), Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, F. and Seward, A.S., More Letters of Charles Darwin, London: John Murray, 1903, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, Am. Biol. Teacher., 1973, vol. 35, pp. 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driesch, H., The Science and Philosophy of the Organism, London: Black, 1908, vols. 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garstang, W., The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the biogenetic law, J. Linn. Soc. Zool., 1922, vol. 35, pp. 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garstang, W., The morphology of the Tunicata, and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata, Quart. J. Microscop. Sci., 1928, vol. 75, pp. 51–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E., Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1866, vol. 1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E., Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere, Jena. Z. Naturwiss., 1875, vol. 9, pp. 404–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S., The time of action of genes, and its bearing on some evolutionary problems, Am. Natur., 1932, vol. 66, pp. 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K., Evolutionary Developmental Biology, 2nd ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, A., The agreement between the different periods in the life of the individual shell and the collective life of the tetrabranchiate cephalopods, Proc. Boston Soc. Natur. Hist., 1866, vol. 10, pp. 302–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jägersten, G., Evolution of the Metazoan Life Cycle, London: Acad. Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M.L., Heterochrony: Beyond words, Paleobiology, 1999, vol. 25, pp. 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M.L. and McNamara, K.J., Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny, New York: Plenum Press, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K.J., Inside evolution: 1992 presidential address, J. Roy. Soc. W. Austral., 1993, vol. 76, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K.J. and McKinney, M.L., Heterochrony, disparity, and macroevolution, Paleobiology, 2005, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehnert, E., Biomechanik, erschlossen aus den Prinzipien der Organogenese, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F., Witness for Darwin, in F. Myuller, E. Gekkel’. Osnovnoi biogeneticheskii zakon (F. Müller, E. Haeckel: The Main Biogenetic Law), Schmalhausen, I.I, Ed., Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940, pp. 61–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R.A., The Shape of Life, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R. and Kaufman, T., Embriony, geny i evolyutsiya (Embryos, Genes, and Evolution: The DevelopmentalGenetic Basis of Evolutionary Change), Moscow: Mir, 1986 [New York–London: Macmillan Publ. Co, 1983].

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, S.M., Wiley, E.O., and Meinhardt, D.J., An integrative approach to heterochrony: The distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1997, vol. 60, pp. 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S.H., The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 907–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W., Gesammelte Abhandlungen über Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, Leipzig: Engelmann, 1896, vols. 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I.I., Puti i zakonomernosti evolyutsionnogo protsessa (Pathways and Patterns of the Evolutionary Process), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I.I., Organizm kak tseloe v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii (Organism As a Whole in Individual and Historical Development), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severtsov, A.N., Etyudy po teorii evolyutsii (Etudes on the Evolutionary Theory), Berlin: Gosizdat RSFSR, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severtsov, A.N., Morfologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Morphological Patterns of Evolution), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary patterns of ontogeny, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1981, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and natural selection, Ontogenez, 1984, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary patterns of ontogeny, in Sovremennaya Paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Menner, V.V. and Makridin, V.P., Eds., Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 169–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and lessons of evolutionism, Ontogenez, 2006, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary theory and scientific thinking, Paleontol. Zh., 2010, no. 6, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Historical changes in ontogeny as evidence of system transformation (on the question of the nature of heterochronies), in Morfogenez v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii: geterokhronii, geterotopii i allometriya (Morphogenesis in Individual and Historical Development: Heterochronies, Heterotopies, and Allometry), Moscow: Inst. Biol. Razvit. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, pp. 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.K., Heterochrony revisited: The evolution of developmental sequences, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2001, vol. 73, pp. 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.K., Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development, J. Morphol., 2002, vol. 252, pp. 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G.L., Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H., The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion on Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology, London: Allen and Unwin, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D., Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic data, Geobios (Mém. Spéc.), 1989, no. 12, pp. 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. and Zelditch, M.L., Evolutionary modifications of ontogeny: Heterochrony and beyond, Paleobiology, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M.L., Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution of Development, New York: Wiley–Liss, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117997, Russia

    M. A. Shishkin

Authors
  1. M. A. Shishkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Shishkin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.A. Shishkin, 2016, published in Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2016, No. 2, pp. 11–25.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shishkin, M.A. Evolution of ontogeny and nature of heterochronies. Paleontol. J. 50, 117–130 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116020076

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116020076

Keywords

Search

Navigation