The analytical structure, absolute value, and angular anisotropy of the double differential cross section for bremsstrahlung at the nonresonant inelastic scattering of an X-ray photon by a multicharged helium-like atomic ion have been theoretically predicted.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 INTRODUCTION
Beginning from works by Sommerfeld [1] and Bethe and Heitler [2] to date, the fundamental microcosm effect of bremsstrahlung at the scattering of a free electron in the electric field of an atom (atomic nucleus) is studied within quantum theory (see, e.g., monographs [3, 4] and reviews [5, 6]). In addition to this effect, bremsstrahlung effects induced by the free electron scattering of a photon by an atom (atomic nucleus) are of fundamental interest (e.g., for the physics of laboratory [7] and astrophysical [8] plasma). In this case, the bremsstrahlung probability amplitudes {e.g., the emission of a photon by a continuous spectrum electron (Fig. 1b) [4–6] and the polarization of the atom (atomic nucleus) by the continuous spectrum electron with the subsequent emission of a photon (Fig. 1d) [3]} appear as substructures of the total scattering probability amplitudes. The first such study was performed in our works [9, 10] for the single resonant inelastic scattering [11–13] of a photon by a multielectron atom. In this work, we carry out the first theoretical study of the bremsstrahlung effect induced by single nonresonant inelastic scattering of a photon by a multicharged atomic ion [14–16]. Such studies are necessary, in particular, for the interpretation of background (continuum) structure of X-ray emission spectra of multicharged atomic ions of the hot plasma. For our study, a helium-like silicon atomic ion Si12+ (the charge number of the nucleus of the ion is Z = 14 and the configuration and term of the ground state are \([0] = 1{{s}^{2}}{{[}^{1}}{{S}_{0}}]\)) was chosen because the ground state of the Si12+ ion is spherically symmetric and this ion is assumingly available in the gas phase for highly precise experiments. In particular, such an experiment can combine the generation of multicharged ions and their capture in a “trap” with the subsequent scattering of radiation of an X-ray free electron laser (XFEL; see, e.g., [17] and review [18]).
2 THEORY
We consider processes of the nonresonant inelastic scattering of the photon by electrons of the helium-like atomic ion:
Here and below, the atomic system of units is used \((\hbar = e = {{m}_{e}} = 1)\), \(l \geqslant 0\), \(J = L\), ω (ωC) is the energy of the incident (scattered) photon, x ϵ [0, ∞) (ε = ω – I1s – ωC) is the energy of the continuous-spectrum electron of the intermediate (final) scattering state, and I1s is the ionization threshold energy of the 1s2 shell. Process (1) is nonresonant Compton scattering (Fig. 1a) described by the contact interaction operator
Process (2) corresponds to stimulated bremsstrahlung (Fig. 1b) described by the radiative transition operator
where \({{\hat {A}}_{n}}\) is the electromagnetic field operator in the secondary quantization representation, \({{\hat {p}}_{n}}\) is the momentum operator of the nth electron of the ion, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and N is the number of electrons in the ion. In this work, scattering probability amplitudes are constructed in the Tamm–Dancoff approximation [19] with the limit on the number of “particles” (photons, electrons, and vacancies) by limiting Feynman diagrams with the maximum value N0 = 2. In particular, the probability amplitude of polarization bremsstrahlung (Fig. 1d) with N0 = 5 is omitted. The probability amplitude of spontaneous production of particles before the absorption of the incident photon (Fig. 1c with N0 = 4) is neglected in the Tamm–Dancoff approximation. It is noteworthy that the analytical justification of the Tamm–Dancoff approximation and limits of its applicability is an open problem (see, e.g., [20] and references therein). However, the inclusion of the Feynman diagrams only with N0 ≤ 2 in the Tamm–Dancoff approximation corresponds in our case to quantum mechanical perturbation theory. The truncation of, e.g., Feynman diagrams in Fig. 1d is mathematically justified by a higher order of smallness of this diagram compared to the diagram in Fig. 1b. It can certainly be assumed that the inclusion of the resonant production of the virtual electron and vacancy at the time \({{t}_{2}} < {{t}_{3}}\) (Fig. 1d) will allow the description of the physically significant effect of resonant polarization bremsstrahlung.
Let us determine the analytical structures of the double differential scattering cross sections through channels (1) and (2) using the methods of algebra of creation (annihilation) operators for photons, the theory of irreducible tensor operators, the theory of nonorthogonal orbitals (see, e.g., [20] and references therein), and the approximation of zero natural decay width of the 1s vacancy. Beyond the dipole approximation for the \(\hat {Q}\) operator, the cross section for nonresonant Compton scattering (CS; Figs. 1a and 2b) is given by the expression [15]
Here, ΩC is the solid emission angle of the scattered photon, r0 is the classical electron radius, η = 〈1s0|1s+〉2/27.21, and
Here, \({{\hat {j}}_{l}}\) is the lth order spherical Bessel function of the first kind; q = |k – kC|, where k (kC) is the wave vector of the incident (scattered) photon; and subscripts 0 and + correspond to the radial parts of the wavefunctions of electrons obtained by solving the Hartree–Fock equations for the initial ([0]) and final \(([1{{s}_{ + }}])\) states of the ion, respectively. The calculation shows that the l = 1 term makes the dominant contribution to the sum in Eq. (7) for the Si12+ ion, whereas the contribution from terms with l ≠ 1 is negligibly small. As a result, the quantum interference of channels (1) and (2) is absent. The axisymmetric (with respect to the vector k) parameter μ in Eq. (6) determines, along with the parameter q in the Bessel function \({{\hat {j}}_{l}}\), the angular anisotropy of nonresonant Compton scattering. This parameter is specified in application to three schemes of the proposed experiment. In the first scheme, the polarization vectors of photons are perpendicular to the plane of scattering \((\mathbf{e},{\mathbf{e}_{{\text{C}}}} \bot P)\). In the second scheme, the polarization vectors of photons are parallel to the plane of scattering (e, eC || P). In the third scheme, unpolarized (NP) photons are used. Here, P is the plane of scattering determined by the vectors k and kC. As a result,
where θ is the scattering angle, i.e., the angle between the vectors k and kC. In the dipole approximation for the \(\hat {R}\) operator, the bremsstrahlung cross section (BS; Figs. 1b and 2a) is specified by the formula
where
and the parameter ρ determines the angular anisotropy of bremsstrahlung and has the form
The singular single-electron bremsstrahlung probability amplitude was obtained in the form of velocity in the plane wave approximation for radial parts of the wavefunctions of continuous-spectrum electrons: \({\text{|}}x\rangle \cong {{\left( {\frac{2}{{{{\pi }^{2}}x}}} \right)}^{{1/4}}}\sin (r\sqrt {2x} )\) and, as a result,
where δ is the Dirac delta function. The analytical structure of the cross section given by Eq. (11) qualitatively reproduces the following known results. First, in the approximation of zero natural decay width of the 1s vacancy, the “infrared divergence” of the bremsstrahlung cross section appears at zero energy of the scattered photon [11, 12]:
Second, at zero energy of the continuous-spectrum electron in the final state (Fig. 2a; the ωC = ω – I1s straight line on the (ω, ωC) plane),
This equality corresponds to the Born approximation for the differential cross section for bremsstrahlung by the nonrelativistic electron in the Coulomb field of the nucleus [21, 22]:
at \({{v}_{2}} \to 0\), where \({{v}_{1}}({{v}_{2}})\) is the velocity of the incident (scattered) electron. As expected, the cross section given by Eq. (11) satisfies not only Eqs. (17) and (18) but also the asymptotic condition: the single-electron transition probability amplitude in the limit \(\omega \to \infty \) is \(\langle 1{{s}_{0}}{\text{|}}r{\text{|}}\varepsilon {{p}_{ + }}\rangle \sim {{\omega }^{{ - 7/4}}}\) and, as a result,
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the calculation are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. The value I1s = 2437.650 eV [23] was accepted for the ionization energy threshold of the 1s2 shell of the Si12+ ion. The energy of the incident photon ω was considered in the range of 4.5–15.0 keV, where the criterion of applicability of the dipole approximation for the \(\hat {R}\) operator \({{\lambda }_{\omega }}{\text{/}}\langle {{r}_{{1s}}}\rangle \gg 1\) for the calculation of the bremsstrahlung cross section is satisfied, e.g., at the wavelength of the incident photon \({{\lambda }_{\omega }} = 1.852{\kern 1pt} \) Å (\(\omega = 6.70{\kern 1pt} \) keV; the energy of the \(K\alpha \) emission line of Fe24+ [24]) and the average radius \(\langle {{r}_{{1s}}}\rangle = 0.058\) Å of the 1s shell of the Si12+ ion.
The results in Fig. 2a demonstrate that the bremsstrahlung cross section tends to infrared divergence (17) and to the satisfaction of the asymptotic condi-tion (20) and that it makes the leading contribution to the total scattering cross section in the near superthreshold region (\({{I}_{{1s}}} < \omega < 15{\kern 1pt} \) keV). The cross section for nonresonant Compton scattering becomes leading at \(\omega \geqslant 15{\kern 1pt} \) keV (Fig. 2b). However, we note that the cross section for nonresonant Compton scattering in the || scheme of the experiment vanishes at the scattering angle θ = 90° (\({{\mu }^{\parallel }} = 0 \Rightarrow \sigma _{{CS}}^{{(2)}} = 0\)) and the total scattering cross section is determined only by bremsstrahlung (ρ|| = 1/3). The results in Fig. 3 demonstrate angular anisotropy (predominant scattering in the directions θ = 0° and 180°) of bremsstrahlung in the || scheme of the experiment and the experiment with unpolarized photons. This result qualitatively reproduces the result obtained in [10] for resonant inelastic scattering of the photon by the multielectron atom. It is noteworthy that the \({{K}_{s}}\) and \({{K}_{d}}\) scattering states in Eq. (3) make comparable contributions to the total scattering cross section. If the \({{K}_{d}}\) state is di-sregarded, the bremsstrahlung cross section in the || scheme of the experiment vanishes at the scattering angle θ = 90°.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The double differential cross section for the nonresonant inelastic scattering of an X-ray photon by a multicharged helium-like atomic ion has been theoretically studied. We have established (i) the leading role of bremsstrahlung in the near superthreshold scattering region and (ii) the pronounced angular anisotropy of bremsstrahlung in the corresponding schemes of the expected experiment. The results are predictive. Their possible generalization, e.g., to other multicharged ions and multielectron atoms, inclusion of next orders of the Tamm–Dancoff approximation, and allowance for a nonzero spectral width resolution of the XFEL experiment (\({{\Gamma }_{{{\text{beam}}}}} \cong 0.15{-} 0.50\) eV [25]) will be studied in the future.
Change history
12 January 2023
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364022350028
REFERENCES
A. Sommerfeld, Ann. Phys. 11, 257 (1931).
H. A. Bethe and W. Heitler, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 146, 83 (1934).
M. Ya. Amus’ya, Bremsstrahlung (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].
E. Haug and W. Nakel, The Elementary Process of Bremsstrahlung (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
P. A. Krachkov, R. N. Lee, and A. I. Mil’shtein, Phys. Usp. 59, 619 (2016).
D. H. Jakubassa-Amundsen, arXiv: 2103.06034 [physics.atom-ph].
P. Beiersdorfer, J. Phys. B 48, 144017 (2015).
S. Zhekov, M. Gagné, and S. L. Skinner, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 1278 (2022).
A. N. Hopersky, A. M. Nadolinsky, and I. D. Petrov, JETP Lett. 111, 72 (2020).
A. N. Hopersky, A. M. Nadolinsky, I. D. Petrov, and R. V. Koneev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 131, 895 (2020).
T. Åberg and J. Tulkki, in Atomic Inner-Shell Physics, Ed. by B. Crasemann (Plenum, New York, 1985), Chap. 10, p. 419.
P. P. Kane, Phys. Rep. 218, 67 (1992).
J. Szlachetko, J.-Cl. Dousse, M. Berset, K. Fennane, M. Szlachetko, J. Hoszowska, R. Barrett, M. Pajek, and A. Kubala-Kukus, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022512 (2007).
L. A. LaJohn, Phys. Rev. A 81, 043404 (2010).
A. N. Hopersky and A. M. Nadolinsky, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 115, 402 (2012).
Ch.-K. Qiao, J.-W. Wei, and L. Chen, arXiv: 2103.04634 [cond-mat.other].
S. W. Epp, J. R. C. López-Urrutia, G. Brenner, V. Mackel, P. H. Mokler, R. Treusch, M. Kuhlmann, M. V. Yurkov, J. Feldhaus, J. R. Schneider, M. Welhofer, M. Martins, W. Wurt, and J. Ulrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 183001 (2007).
P. Indelicato, J. Phys. B 52, 232001 (2019).
A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971).
A. N. Hopersky, A. M. Nadolinsky, and S. A. Novikov, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063424 (2018).
H. W. Koch and J. W. Motz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 31, 920 (1959).
V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Quantum Electrodynamics (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2008).
W. C. Martin and R. Zalubas, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 12, 323 (1983).
A. V. Malyshev, Y. S. Kozhedub, D. A. Glazov, I. I. Tupitsyn, and V. M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010501(R) (2019).
V. M. Kaganer, I. Petrov, and L. Samoylova, Acta Crystallogr., A 77, 1 (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by R. Tyapaev
The original online version of this article was revised: Due to a retrospective Open Access order.
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hopersky, A.N., Nadolinsky, A.M. Bremsstrahlung at the Nonresonant Inelastic Scattering of a Photon by an Atomic Ion. Jetp Lett. 115, 434–438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364022100423
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364022100423