Skip to main content
Log in

Mirror Pairs of Quintic Orbifolds

  • Methods of Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
JETP Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two constructions of mirror pairs of Calabi-Yau manifolds are compared by example of quintic orbifolds \(\mathcal{Q}\). The first, Berglund—Hubsch—Krawitz, construction is as follows. If X is the factor of the hypersurface \(\mathcal{Q}\) by a certain subgroup H′ of the maximum allowed group SL, the mirror manifold Y is defined as the factor by the dual subgroup H,′T. In the second, Batyrev, construction, the toric manifold T containing the mirror Y as a hypersurface specified by zeros of the polynomial WY is determined from the properties of the polynomial WX specifying the Calabi-Yau manifold X. The polynomial WY is determined in an explicit form. The group of symmetry of the polynomial WY is found from its form and it is tested whether it coincides with that predicted by the Berglund—Hubsch—Krawitz construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 258, 46 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90602-9

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Strominger, Commun. Math. Phys. 133, 163 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096559

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Kreuzer, Phys. Lett. B 328, 312 (1994); arXiv: hepth/9402114 [hep-th]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)91485-0

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Berglund and T. Hubsch, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 9, 327 (1998); arXiv:hep-th/9201014 [hep-th]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(93)90250-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Krawitz, arXiv: 0906.0796.

  6. A. Chiodo and Y. Ruan, arXiv: 0908.0908.

  7. K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm, R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, C. Vafa, R. Vakil, and E. Zaslow, Mirrorsymmetry (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Batyrev, J. Alg. Geom. 3, 493 (1994); arXiv: alg-geom/9310003 [math.AG].

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Aleshkin, A. Belavin, and A. Litvinov, arXiv: 1812.00478 [hep-th]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab081a

  10. K. Aleshkin and A. Belavin, JETP Lett. 110, 705 (2019); arXiv: 1911.11678 [hep-th].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Belavin and B. Eremin, Theor. Math. Phys. 201, 1606 (2019); arXiv:1907.11102 [hep-th]. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577919110060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, Nucl. Phys. B 338, 15 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90)90622-K

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to A. Litvinov for stimulating discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Belavin.

Additional information

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2020, published in Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 2020, Vol. 112, No. 6, pp. 388–393.

Funding

This work was performed at the Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences. A. Belavin acknowledges the support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (state assignment no. 0033-2019-0004). B. Eremin acknowledges the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 18-12-00439).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belavin, A., Eremin, B. Mirror Pairs of Quintic Orbifolds. Jetp Lett. 112, 370–375 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136402018006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136402018006X

Navigation